With their $400 price tags, recently announced phones like theand the give many cost-conscious users more options to choose from. But the launches of new affordable phones also mean additional discounts on older phones that debuted last year. This includes Motorola's , which was originally $300 and now goes for $200. Back when it launched, we compared the Moto G7 with , which is still priced at $399 (£399, AU$649).
Because both handsets offer a lot of the same great camera, battery and design features as their high-end rivals, we considered two of our favorite wallet-friendly phones from 2019 in categories like camera performance, specs, battery life and all-around design to determine which one is a better deal for you.
Though the Pixel 3A is objectively the "better" phone, the Moto G7's $200 price tag makes it an outstanding deal. Even before the deeply discounted price, it earned our CNET's Editors' Choice Award. The phone has a sleek design, a large screen and expandable storage, which is especially useful if you take lots of photos and video but don't like the idea of storing everything on a cloud.
If you want even more battery life, consider the Moto G7 Power. It's a contender for the longest battery life of any phone we tested in 2019, clocking in 23 hours and 10 minutes of continuous video playback in Airplane mode). It also has a lot of the same great features as the traditional G7.
If you're not on a tight budget, the Pixel 3A is a great phone. But considering how much you'd now save on the Moto G7 and the arrival of newer 2020 budget phones, it may be best to wait for Google to slash the price on the Pixel 3A and Pixel 3A XL. Though it shaves off a few features from 2018's Pixel 3 (it's not water-resistant, it doesn't have wireless charging and it maxes out at 64GB of storage), the Pixel 3A has a solid camera, a headphone jack and longer battery life and a faster processor than the Moto G7.
How we tested
Camera: Pixel 3A's camera excels
If camera is your main priority when you're looking for a phone, this is likely where your search would end because there is a clear winner here: the Pixel 3A.
This is true even though the Pixel 3A has a single 12.2-megapixel camera on the back, while the Moto G7 has two cameras: one 12-megapixel camera and a 5-megapixel depth camera. And both phones have an 8-megapixel selfie camera on the front.
The Pixel 3A sets a high bar for the Moto G7, since it has the same camera as the more expensive Pixel 3. The Pixel 3 has consistently been one of our top performers in previous camera comparisons (at least for stills). That said, the G7 didn't lag too much when it came to general photography.
In near-perfect conditions, it's a nearly even playing field. The Pixel 3A has better dynamic range than the Moto G7 (especially with the HDR Plus enhancement enabled), but the G7 has a slightly cooler color temperature, which looks great on landscapes. For anything else, however, you'll notice a stark contrast in quality. Night shots and lowlight pictures on the Moto G7 are grainy with a lot of noise in the background, and portraits taken with the second camera look a bit blown out and unnatural. The Pixel 3A crops in closer for portraits, but shows a lot more detail in the subject and the transition from background to foreground looks a lot more natural. Plus you can adjust the intensity of the blur if it ever goes overboard with the effect.
It's in these difficult scenarios where the Pixel 3A really shines. Its low-light mode, Nightsight, excels at lighting up dim settings and smoothing out images so that it looks as if you can see in the dark. HDR Plus Enhanced mode tackles tricky lighting scenarios by rendering a great image from several different exposures. And while digital zoom will always have some degree of graininess and digital noise, the Pixel 3A's zoom works much better than the Moto G7's. We were also impressed by how well the Pixel 3A pulls off portrait shots with just a single lens. Foregrounds remain sharp and richly detailed, while the falloff between them and the background looked smooth.
One nifty feature that the Pixel 3A has out of the box is time-lapse video. The videos were clear and steady overall, and we like the way you can change the time intervals and see how long the video will be as you record it. But it isn't perfect, and the recording looked muddier and grainer than the timelapse on the iPhone XR.
Video in general isn't a strong suit for either one of these phones, but the Pixel 3A still comes out on top. The results won't be as obvious when watching them on their respective phone screens, but once you take them off the camera, you'll notice video on the Pixel 3A looks a lot sharper and clearer. The Moto G7 oversaturates colors and increases contrast to compensate for the lack of detail, but can look unnatural as a result.
The Moto G7 also lacks optical image stabilization. This makes its tracking shots look jerky compared with the smoother quality of the Pixel 3A, which has both optical and digital image stabilization. OIS is also the reason why the Pixel 3A works so well in low light. While video and stills look dark and grainy on the G7, on the Pixel 3A they're sharper and brighter.
As for the front-facing camera, both phones can take portrait-mode photos. And while we liked how the Moto G7 made skin tones look warmer, the Pixel 3A's camera is just sharper and retains more details. Lighting was also more even on the Pixel 3A, whereas the Moto G7 had a tendency to overexpose or blow out light sources.
There is one possible workaround for the Moto G7 that could improve your photos if you're willing to try it out, and that's installing the, which basically layers the Pixel 3A's camera onto the existing G7 camera interface along with some of the software features that make the Pixel 3A's camera great. The procedure isn't as easy as simply downloading an app, but it improves the camera significantly and the results are worth it.
Winner: The Google Pixel 3A. Even with the APK workaround, the Moto G7's camera is no match for the Pixel 3A's.
Battery and performance: Pixel 3A is the clear winner
Both phones have a 3,000-mAh battery, but the Pixel beat the Moto G7 by about 3.5 hours during our testing, which consists of playing a video on a continuous loop in Airplane mode. To be more exact, the Pixel lasted 16.5 hours, while the G7 died after about 12.8 hours. Both phones offer their own version of fast charging (the Pixel with Fast Charge and the Moto G7 with Turbo Charge), but neither has wireless charging.
The Pixel 3A has a 2GHz Snapdragon 670, while the Moto G7 has a 1.8GHz Snapdragon 632 processor. Though you won't notice it unless you have both phones right next to one another, the Pixel 3A is a tad faster at loading apps and running multiple programs than the Moto G7. The Pixel 3A also edges out the Moto G7 when it comes to processing power and came out on top during all four of our benchmark tests.
There were some cases where the Pixel 3A did take a beat or two longer. Though Google reoptimized the OS to work with the Snapdragon 670 chipset, the things that needed extra processing time on the Pixel 3 also felt like they took the same amount of time on the 3A. That includes HDR Plus Enhanced, Night Sight and screen flash for the front-facing camera.
Winner: The Pixel 3A is a faster phone with longer battery life, but the Moto G7's performance is good for a $200 phone.
Design: Pixel's bright display or G7's sleek looks?
Though the Pixel 3A has a smaller, 5.6-inch display, its OLED screen is brighter and more vibrant than the Moto G7's 6.2-inch LCD screen. It's easier to view in sunlight, blues and greens pop more and blacks are inkier. The color shift is also more severe on the Moto G7. When viewing both phones from the side, the screen washes out more dramatically on the Moto G7. But you can really only notice these differences when holding the phones side by side. If you're just handling the Moto G7 alone, you won't have any gripes about its display.
Both phones have a fingerprint scanner on the back and a headphone jack. The Pixel 3A has the familiar design of the Pixel 3. It's small, lightweight and comfortable to navigate. But unlike the original Pixel 3, it has a plastic back that makes it look and feel cheaper in the hand than the all-glass Moto G7.
The glass on the back of the Moto G7 has a subtle curve on the edge reminiscent of Samsung's Galaxy phones. And the nearly bezelless display gives it a high-end feel on the front as well. The G7 has a tiny dewdrop notch on the top for the front camera, while the Pixel 3A has two thick bezels on the top and bottom of the phone to house the camera.
The downside of having all that glass though, is that the Moto G7 is prone to smudges on either side. It also feels more fragile than the Pixel 3A. On both sides it's covered in Corning's, which is a few generations behind the current that's on a lot of the high-end flagships like the Galaxy S10. The front of the Pixel 3A is covered in Asahi's Dragontrail Glass, a Gorilla Glass alternative that we haven't drop-tested yet.
But if you're more prone to spills than drops, the Moto G7 is the one of these two phones that offers some kind of water protection. It's water- and dust-repellent, according to Motorola, while the Pixel 3A has no official rating.
Winner: The all-glass Moto G7 edges out the Pixel 3A's plastic exterior, although we do like the OLED screen and purplish color option on Google's phone.
Software and UI: Android without the bloatware
Both phones run Android, but the Pixel 3A has a bit of Google's UI layered on top, while the Moto G7 has a few features exclusive the Motorola phone. Given this, both remain pretty true to the stock version of Android, which we love.
Some of the Motorola UI features we like on the Moto G7 include a standby feature that shows you the time and lock screen if you wave your hand over it while the phone is lying screen-side-up, and automatically switches to "do not disturb" mode when you flip it over. On the annoying side of the spectrum is the Moto G7's jingle, which seems to be programmed to play every minute if you forget to put the phone on silent or vibrate. (OK, maybe not every minute, but it plays every time there's an update or notification.)
The Pixel 3A, on the other hand, has AR walking navigation in Google Maps right out of the box. By overlaying navigational directions right on the screen in real time, you can begin orienting yourself as soon as you start walking directions in Maps, which is quite useful. If you have a terrible sense of direction (like we do), it's a good tool to have. But the feature isn't exclusive to the Pixel 3A and it has rolled out to other Android phones as well.
Both phones also offer 64GB of onboard storage, but only the Moto G7 has a microSD card slot to expand it locally. Google offers free cloud storage for Pixel 3A users, but it doesn't store photos at their original quality but rather "high" quality, which isn't as large.
Winner: Tie. The Moto G7 has expandable storage, but the Pixel will be the first to get Android updates.
In the end, while the Pixel 3A has a better camera and faster processor, the Moto G7's reliable and solid overall performance combined with its $200 price tag make it the better value buy.
Pixel 3A vs. Moto G7 spec comparison
||Google Pixel 3A||Motorola Moto G7|
|Display size, resolution||5.6-inch gOLED; 2,220x1,080 pixels||6.2-inch LCD; 2,270x1,080 pixels|
|Dimensions (millimeters)||151.3x70.1x 8.2||157x75.3x8|
|Weight||5.19 oz.; 147g||6.07 oz.; 172g|
|Mobile OS||Android 9.0, can update to Android 10||Android 9.0, can update to Android 10|
|Processor||2GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 670||1.8GHz octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 632|
|Expandable storage||No||Up to 512GB|
|Battery||3,000 mAh||3,000 mAh|
|Special features||AR in Google Maps, Time-lapse video shooting||Water repellent with P2i nano-coating; TurboPower charging|
|Price off-contract (USD)*||$399||$299|
*Note: Prices at launch