Lyft joins Uber in suing New York City over limits on cruising time
The ride-hailing company says the new rule is "highly damaging."
Abrar Al-HeetiVideo producer / CNET
Abrar Al-Heeti is a video host and producer for CNET, with an interest in internet trends, entertainment, pop culture and digital accessibility. Before joining the video team, she was a writer for CNET's culture team. She graduated with bachelor's and master's degrees in journalism from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Though Illinois is home, she now loves San Francisco -- steep inclines and all.
ExpertiseAbrar has spent her career at CNET breaking down the latest trends on TikTok, Twitter and Instagram, while also reporting on diversity and inclusion initiatives in Hollywood and Silicon Valley.Credentials
Named a Tech Media Trailblazer by the Consumer Technology Association in 2019, a winner of SPJ NorCal's Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2022 and has three times been a finalist in the LA Press Club's National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards.
filed a lawsuit Friday against the city of New York over regulations that limit the amount of time drivers can cruise certain busy parts of Manhattan without a passenger. The ride-hailing company called for the Taxi and Limousine Commission's "highly damaging cruising rule" to be eliminated.
"Lyft supports comprehensive congestion pricing, which is the most effective way to reduce traffic," Lyft spokeswoman Campbell Matthews said in a statement. "But the TLC's rushed, arbitrary approach would be a significant step backwards for transportation in New York City, which for years has suffered from an inefficient taxi medallion system created by the TLC. This rule is not a serious attempt to address congestion, and would hurt riders and drivers in New York."
Lyft's suit, which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, says the cruising rule is founded on a TLC study using "outdated, unreliable data." The suit also says the rule "unfairly" doesn't apply to taxis even though they contribute to congestion, and doesn't take into consideration the negative effects this can have on underserved communities.
TLC spokesman Allan J. Fromberg said the agency hasn't yet been served with the suit, "but it's clear that it's another attack on the city's consistent efforts to reduce congestion and help drivers earn a living for their families while working with companies that have stacked the deck against them by flooding the streets with drivers in a race to the bottom. We will vigorously defend against this suit, and we will continue to fight for safer, less congested streets and for drivers' rights."
Watch this: Uber, Lyft drivers in CA closer to employment, AppleCare now offered as a subscription
Originally published Oct. 11, 4:39 p.m. PT. Update, 5:14 p.m.: Adds comment from Taxi and Limousine Commission.