iOS 8 hits 85% adoption rate; Android Lollipop only at 18%
Apple's iOS 8 launched last September, while Android Lollipop hit the market in November. So why is there such a huge gap in their adoption numbers?
Lance WhitneyContributing Writer
Lance Whitney is a freelance technology writer and trainer and a former IT professional. He's written for Time, CNET, PCMag, and several other publications. He's the author of two tech books--one on Windows and another on LinkedIn.
But 85 percent is still an impressive number, especially since iOS 8 got off to a slow start as it was plagued by a number of initial bugs. And iOS 9 is due for lift-off next month, so some iOS 7 users may be holding off on iOS 8, waiting to upgrade to the new version.
And what about iOS rival Android? The latest flavor, namely Android Lollipop, is on just 18 percent of all devices running Google's mobile OS, according to the latest Android Developers Dashboard. Drilling down, Android 5.0 is nestled on 15.5 percent of all devices that visited the Google Play store during the seven-day period ending August 3, while Android 5.1 is only 2.6 percent of devices.
Released last September, iOS 8 did have a head start over Android 5.0, which launched last November. But that's not a big head start. So why is iOS 8 on such a greater percentage of devices? The answer lies in the Android distribution process. Apple controls the entire process of rolling out a new version of iOS as well as incremental updates. Apple creates, tests, and then deploys a new OS so it's easily available for all iOS users at the same time.
On the flip side, new versions of Android face a more difficult time getting into the hands of users. In a "too many cooks in the kitchen" scenario, Google must first create and test a new version of Android. Then the mobile device makers get involved by doing their own testing and certification. And unlike iOS, which includes just three devices -- the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch -- the world of Android is flooded with hundreds and hundreds of different devices from various manufacturers. Every manufacturer must test a new version or update on each of its devices. Finally, the mobile carriers step in to test and deploy a new version of Android. So a system that's relatively quick and painless for iOS is relatively long and painful for Android.
The process also leads to Android fragmentation. Just as a mobile device maker or carrier is deploying an existing version of Android, a new version is usually already available. So the manufacturers and carriers are constantly playing a game of catch-up. This means that several different versions of Android are installed on users' devices at any given time.
The latest Android Developers Dashboard paints a typical picture. Though Lollipop is catching up in adoption, the prior edition, KitKat, holds the lead at 39.3 percent. The version before KitKat, Jelly Bean, is still up there with a 33.6 percent share. Even older versions, such as Ice Cream Sandwich and Gingerbread remain in the game with shares of 4.1 percent and 4.6 percent, respectively.
This type of fragmentation frustrates Android users, who are always clamoring for the latest version. But it also frustrates Android app developers, who decide which versions to support.
In contrast, Apple's iOS 7 is down to a share of 13 percent, while older versions of iOS are scraping out a mere 2 percent. There is no problem with iOS fragmentation since users can freely download the latest version of iOS as soon as it's available and assuming their device supports it. And developers can design their apps for the current version of iOS and then gradually take advantage of any new features offered in the newest version.
Fragmentation certainly doesn't affect the popularity of Android, which towers over iOS in market share and sales throughout the world. But the problem does make Android updates much more messy than those for iOS. So the whole update process is one that Google needs to find a way to streamline for the benefit of both Android users and developers.