Next week, the tech giant within 90 days.from a . The order, dated Sept. 10, says Apple must allow developers to include buttons or links in their apps that give people the chance to purchase digital items outside its App Store
In a legal filing to the US Court of Appeals on Tuesday, Apple said it's facing "substantial engineering" challenges to allowing developers to circumvent its in-app purchase system while still providing "layers of protection" it currently offers, like parental controls as well as purchase authorization and tracking.
"Apple would have to create a system and process for doing so," Apple said in its filing, adding that doing so would "impose irreparable injury" if it wins an appeal. For those reasons, it's asking the appeals court to delay the federal judge's order until the appeals process has concluded.
Epic, in a competing filing, said Apple hadn't proven its case against the order. "Purchasing options outside of apps are already available on iOS devices," Epic wrote. "The injunction simply removes obstacles that Apple imposed to prevent users from learning about and choosing those options."
In theory, the new rule would mean people seeking to pay for extra lives in a game or a new look for their character could pay the developer directly, rather than using Apple's in-app purchase system. That service, earlier reported by the Foss Patents blog., charges developers up to a 30% commission on any digital items bought within apps. The new filing was
Apple's new filing to the appeals court marks its latest move in its ongoing efforts to keep control of the App Store. The tech giant's been battling with various app developers in and out of court over rules Apple says are designed to keep iPhone and iPad owners safe from scams and security issues. Fortnite maker Epic, meanwhile, has argued that Apple's efforts to retain control over its App Store hurt competition and keep app prices high because Apple forces many developers -- particularly game makers --.
The debate has extended far beyond the courtroom, sparking conversations among lawmakers in the US and overseas who are now considering a series of laws designed to, including Apple.
Apple's asked the appeals court to respond by Dec. 8, the estimated date the injunction goes into effect. The appeals court has not filed a response indicating it will rule by that date.