I remember when I. It was back in 2012, when I first moved to New Jersey and began my routine of hour-long commutes into Manhattan. I that it was small, but not too small.
It was my favorite iPad.
I now carry a lot of gear on that same train ride: A, a Kindle Paperwhite, my phone, a larger iPad and maybe a laptop. There's plenty of redundancy in my life. But it's also where we are as a culture. Busy people with their faces buried in many purpose-built portable gadgets.
The iPad Mini now lives in a land of 6-inch phones and tons of tablets, Chromebooks and convertible tablet PCs. It's another tool in the bag. Maybe I have gadget clutter. Maybe the-- starting at $399 (£399, AU$599) and available to order now -- could help .
But here's the thing: The new iPad Mini is an incremental product update, a spec bump to a tablet that otherwise looks the same as the model from 2015. Does that? After using it for a few days... it's fine. But it's not something you need. In fact, if you have an old , you're good. Lifestyle clutter problem solved. (You're welcome.)
But if you want an iPad Mini and have been waiting for a good up-to-date version, it's here: The Mini now has an A12 processor and Pencil support. I've been using one here in San Francisco while attending the Game Developers Conference, where I've been running around trying on and taking notes like a maniac.
Is this a device you need? I don't. My phone takes notes. I jot ideas and watch movies on a larger iPad. The size of the Mini still feels really nice, but its nonupdated design -- same form, same bezels, same everything -- feels ancient compared to the future-bendingarriving imminently. , but they blow up the idea of even carrying two different gadgets.
Maybe the iPad Mini is a hold-the-fort update, a spec bump to last until Apple reinvents its product lineup again. If you want to know more, read on.
Yes, it's fast
Its A12 processor won't end up being as fast as the iPad Pro's A12X, though. Early Geekbench 4 benchmarks show a single core score of 4,810, and a multicore score of 11,559, which is basically the same speed as the iPhone XS. Meanwhile the 11-inch iPad Pro's A12X processor gets benchmarks that are somewhat faster in single-core and significantly faster in multicore. Multitasking, for the apps I've tried so far, seems to be a lot better than the iPad Mini 4 could handle, so no surprise there.
Pencil support is nice to have (and the Logitech Crayon too)
The iPad Mini doesn't work with the new Apple Pencil, but it can connect with the original Pencil and it works just as well as on last year's 9.7-inch iPad. It also supports Logitech's cute little Pencil alternative,. Sketching is fun, but I'm not an artist. One problem with the Mini is that the smaller 7.9-inch screen has less real estate. The larger bezel removes a chunk of possible work area. And there's no place to store that Pencil, so you'll want a case that slots a Pencil holder in.
Touch ID and a headphone jack are still there (which I prefer)
I'm happy that the Mini lacks Face ID, and still works with headphones. Most people, I bet, will agree. The only downside here is that it has a ton of bezel at the top and bottom, which makes movies feel pretty hemmed-in and small.
It's crazy small compared to other iPads...
It's bigger than my Kindle, but it's easy to use one-handed and carry around like a book. For casual travel and reading, or anyone who needs one for on-the-go work, it's a solid middle-ground screen.
...But that bezel.
The extra space on the top and bottom of the iPad Mini aren't aging well. It could easily be used for more screen space. Against the latest iPhones and the fancier iPad Pros, it feels glaring. But if Apple had added Face ID and increased the screen-to-body ratio, then the Mini might be even more expensive.
This isn't for little kids... or is it?
I mean, you could buy your little kid an iPad Mini for $399, but I wouldn't. That price (or $529 for the 256GB model) sets it out of range for a lot of parents. It's a shame, because the iPad Mini is otherwise a perfect tablet for children. The $329(which is often on sale for even less) isn't entirely a better bet, since it has less storage (32GB) and an older processor. But at least it's less expensive.
If only this had a mini Pencil, too
The first-gen Pencil is still good, but it's big, and almost dwarfs the Mini. The Logitech Crayon is a little more compact, and works with the Mini, too. But it would be nice to have a smaller, custom-designed stylus instead.
I'd get the iPad Air instead, or the entry-level iPad
I prefer typing on iPads with a connected keyboard case, which becomes tougher (but not impossible) on the Mini. The 9.7-inch $329 iPad has plenty of great keyboard options. So does the, which is basically the 2017 10.5-inch iPad Pro with an A12 processor and no 120Hz ProMotion in the display. The Air is an extra $100, but its extra screen size and smart connector seem worth it. But I don't have the new iPad Air to review yet, so I can't compare.
You know what this is, and whether you want it
An iPad Mini with a faster processor and Pencil support is filling a specific need not everyone will have. It's like a specifically sized screw, or a particular TV size. As Apple keeps splitting its iPad line into more variants, the Mini feels far less essential than ever, particularly as the iPhone screens creep to 6 inches or more. But if you need an efficient iPad this size and don't want a bigger iPhone for the job, well, this is what you're looking for.
A missed opportunity
It would be nice if Apple had reconceived the design of the iPad Mini and the Pencil to be even better at maximizing its size and function. Is this a notepad or something more? Could it aspire to be as versatile as a, or push further to be a perfect little full-screen device? The Mini is a spec-bumped tablet, rather than a truly reimagined product.
And that's the thing: It's fiiiine. But unlike the, which managed to be both throwback and fun, or the Retina return of the MacBook Air, the Mini doesn't feel quite as triumphant in the sea of other Apple-made alternatives.
I guess in the end, what I'm saying is it didn't spark joy.