Galaxy Z Flip 4 Preorder Quest 2: Still the Best Student Internet Discounts Best 55-Inch TV Galaxy Z Fold 4 Preorder Nintendo Switch OLED Review Foldable iPhone? 41% Off 43-Inch Amazon Fire TV
Want CNET to notify you of price drops and the latest stories?
No, thank you
Accept angers artists by outing their earnings

Starving musicians hawking their tunes on are furious about a new feature that lets listeners know just how starving they are.

Starving musicians hawking their tunes on are furious about a new feature that lets listeners know just how starving they are. late last year unveiled a cash rewards program dubbed Payback for Playback, known by artists as P4P or PFP. The program began without controversy, as the company distributed $200,000 per month to compensate artists for the traffic and sales they generated.

From the beginning, published the incomes of its top-grossing artists under the program. But people are complaining about a change of policy to reveal detailed information about every artist's P4P income, from top-grossing acts raking in thousands of P4P dollars to bands collecting a P4P goose egg.

One group of musicians has launched a petition protesting the income postings. Another artist is urging others to post protest messages to their pages.

"Why, for heaven's sake, why do you make the incomes of artists publicly available?" the petition asks CEO Michael Robertson and other company executives. "Hey, it looks great on pages of artists who made more than $14,000 PFP, but on the page of artists who are still frantically working on their newest album, like us, it looks incredibly embarrassing!!!

"This is no good publicity for, neither is it good publicity for the artists, who will look like what they are: the poorest people on Earth," the petition continues.

One artist, LyinDanTheManagerMan of the band Pig Nose Pickers, posted instructions for effectively erasing the earnings information from individual pages.

In his "Michael's minute" column,'s Robertson defended the P4P postings on the grounds of openness.

"Putting out into the open how much an artist is earning removes the veil see news analysis:'s practices stir debate of secrecy," he wrote. "It's no mystery how much movie stars, pro athletes or TV personalities make; it shouldn't be a classified number what musicians bring home."

Robertson also noted that the postings would let visitors monitor the popularity and profitability of various artists.

"It might even provide wonderful insights into the trends of music listeners and help identify promising talent," he wrote.

Representatives for were not immediately available for comment.

In his column, Robertson also upped the stakes in the P4P arena, announcing that would give away $1 million in both May and June.

The MP3 artists' complaints come as the company faces serious legal problems, as it has unabashedly pushed the envelope to develop new ways of squeezing profits from digital music distribution.

Last month, a federal judge found that is liable for copyright infringement on its service, which allows music buyers to access their CDs from an Internet database created and controlled by The ruling means that the company could be on the hook for millions of dollars in damages, which could put it out of business. has argued that the service is not only legal, but a boon for the recording industry because it helps drive CD sales. The company says it requires members to provide proof of purchase before allowing access to any music on the service.