More Net publications charge fees
With its move to charge readers for archives, the New York Times is joining a trend among publications to charge for Web content.
Web sites that were reluctant in the very early days of the Web to charge users for material now appear to be slowly stepping up and asking them to pay either for materials they once got for free or for new materials that were previously unavailable.
Most sites probably will remain free, but companies are getting braver about charging for certain kinds of content. Yesterday, for instance, Microsoft-owned online magazine Slate announced it would be charging users for content starting next year.
And another publishing powerhouse on the Web, the New York Times, this week is starting a beta test in which it is asking users to pay for archived stories.
She added, however, that it also is "in response to a competitive market."
The Los Angeles Times allows free searches for a week's worth of materials. It then allows users to conduct searches all the way back to 1990 for free and pull up individual stories for $1.50 each.
The San Jose Mercury News also allows seven-day searches for free and only charges $1 per story for anything dating back farther than that. It also lets users search for stories from as far back as 1985.
The Washington Post offers a different approach: it allows free searches of archived stories up to 14 days old, but there apparently is no ability to search back any farther.
Many newspapers, however, such as the San Francisco Examiner and Chronicle at joint site The Gate allow free searches of their archives going back as far as its archives are kept.
While the Wall Street Journal is able to charge subscribers to read material on the Web, few other papers are in a similar position. For the New York Times, which has large national home-delivery circulation, charging users on the Web doesn't make sense, Bradley said.