X

Tesla catches NHTSA flak for some safety claims, documents reveal

It's not the first time Tesla's received warnings about its safety-related marketing.

2018 Tesla Model 3 Performance
Enlarge Image
2018 Tesla Model 3 Performance

Tesla appears unwavering in its dedication to continue using these metrics in its marketing.

Nick Miotke/Roadshow

Tesla's cars are mighty safe, no doubt about it, as we've seen reflected in scores from both NHTSA and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. While Tesla has been eager to tout its five-star NHTSA ratings, it has occasionally reached into its bag of tricks and pulled out lines for marketing that the feds don't necessarily approve of. According to a new report and recently surfaced documents, Tesla has received a fair amount of scrutiny to this end.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration sent Tesla CEO Elon Musk certified mail asking the California-based automaker to stop using certain figures in its marketing about safety claims, Bloomberg reports, citing documents posted to Plainsite, which were obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request.

According to the letter, which was sent on Oct. 17, 2018, NHTSA claimed that Tesla's "use of NHTSA five-star ratings and associated data is inconsistent with NHTSA's government five-star ratings for motor vehicles advertising and communication usage guidelines." Citing a previous violation along the same lines, the letter stated that NHTSA was referring the matter to the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection "to investigate whether these statements constitute unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

The letter appears to focus on Tesla's use of the "probability of injury" metric, a figure Tesla alone has used in its marketing -- other automakers stick with the star-based rating. NHTSA claims that comparing these ratings for vehicles with weight differentials in excess of 250 pounds is against best practices. "It is therefore inaccurate to claim that the has 'the lowest probability of injury in all cars' or that Model 3 occupants are 'less likely to get seriously hurt' or 'have the best chance of avoiding a serious injury,'" the letter reads.

Tesla Model S Long Range takes us back to the future

See all photos

Tesla's counsel, Jonathan Morrison, sent NHTSA a multipage response. "Respectfully, we disagree with the agency's position," Morrison wrote in the letter. "Tesla's blog statements are entirely based on actual test results and NHTSA's own calculations for determining relative risk of injury and probability of injury." The letter went on to scrutinize NHTSA's criticisms, before saying, "We do not see a reason to discontinue use of our safety blog or these statements as long as no other vehicle surpasses the Model 3 Long Range RWD's vehicle safety score and overall probability of injury."

When asked for comment, a Tesla spokesperson pointed Roadshow to Morrison's letter. NHTSA did not immediately return a request for comment.

This is not the first time Tesla and NHTSA have butted heads. After claiming that NHTSA's detailed test results gave the Model S a 5.4-star rating, NHTSA took Tesla to task and the automaker eventually stopped mentioning that tidbit in its materials. Tesla has also tussled with the IIHS after the Model S did not receive a Top Safety Pick award for its performance in crash tests and evaluations. Following that announcement, Tesla subtly hinted that the IIHS might have a subjective agenda beyond safety, which no other automaker has levied at the IIHS after hearing not-so-great news.  

Tesla Model 3 barrels through the snow in Track Mode

See all photos
Watch this: Tesla Model 3 Performance lives up to its name, but still falls short of perfect
Andrew Krok Reviews Editor / Cars
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.
Andrew Krok
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.

Article updated on August 7, 2019 at 8:15 AM PDT

Our Experts

Written by 
Andrew Krok
CNET staff -- not advertisers, partners or business interests -- determine how we review the products and services we cover. If you buy through our links, we may get paid. Reviews ethics statement
Andrew Krok Reviews Editor / Cars
Cars are Andrew's jam, as is strawberry. After spending years as a regular ol' car fanatic, he started working his way through the echelons of the automotive industry, starting out as social-media director of a small European-focused garage outside of Chicago. From there, he moved to the editorial side, penning several written features in Total 911 Magazine before becoming a full-time auto writer, first for a local Chicago outlet and then for CNET Cars.
Why You Can Trust CNET
174175176177178179180+
Experts Interviewed
030405060708091011121314+
Companies Reviewed
108109110111112113+
Products Reviewed

We thoroughly evaluate each company and product we review and ensure our stories meet our high editorial standards.