Our expert, award-winning staff selects the products we cover and rigorously researches and tests our top picks. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Reviews ethics statement
Despite an exceptional camera and a handful of useful software tricks, the Pixel 4 (and its sibling the 4 XL) didn't blow us away when it launched in October 2019. That's because the phone had an average battery life that rivals easily outlasted, it had limited storage and other phones had excellent cameras with their own impressive low-light modes (like the iPhone 11 and OnePlus 7T at the time).
But most of all, the phones were expensive. The Pixel 4 and 4 XL started at $799 and $899, respectively. Fortunately, if you want a Google phone that has a great camera and receives prompt software updates, the Pixel 3A and Pixel 3A XL are much more affordable options. Though Google has discontinued selling them to make way for the Pixel 4A, you can still get them from third-party retailers. When they first launched last year, these midtier handsets cost $399 and $479 (£399 and £469 in the UK, and AU$649 and AU$799 in Australia), but these days they can sell for even cheaper. The phones are essentially reworked Pixel 3 phones from 2018, and the Pixel 3A doesn't have a second telephoto camera like the Pixel 4. But it's these few hardware downgrades that result in the lower price.
This lower price, coupled with solid performance and a great camera, is how the Pixel 3A earned a CNET Editors' Choice.
Editor's note, July 17, 2020: Updated with news that Google has discontinued selling the Pixel 3A and 3A XL. The original review, published on May 7, 2019, follows below.
Both the Pixel 3A and Pixel 3 have a lightweight, unibody design, a matte finish with a glossy shade on the back and a rear fingerprint reader. If I came across both phones for the first time, I wouldn't know off the bat which one was more expensive.
But there are some differences. The Pixel 3A is bigger and made out of polycarbonate instead of glass like the Pixel 3. Its bottom bezel is thicker and the display is a tad larger. The phone also uses a different type of OLED display that features glass as its base layer instead of plastic. Even when both displays are in the same color mode (which you can change in Settings), the Pixel 3A looks a bit punchier at times. Reds, yellows and oranges are warmer and whites look brighter, purer. In contrast, the Pixel 3's screen is bluer and despite being the more high-end device, it has a much more obvious color shift.
One new feature is time-lapse video. You can set your frames to record at various time intervals -- for example, you can condense between 50 seconds or 20 minutes of recorded footage into 10 seconds -- and there's a useful indicator that denotes how long your video will be in real time. To save battery, the viewfinder will also dim after some time, while the phone is still recording.
In general, time-lapse videos were clear and steady, and I love that I can see how long my video will be in the end. But the quality isn't as good as the iPhone XR. In one video I shot at a darkened cocktail party, footage on the Pixel 3A was muddier and grainier than that captured by the iPhone XR. The time-lapse also looked jerkier or more "pulsating" than on the iPhone. Despite the fact that the interface for the iPhone XR's camera is bare and doesn't have different time frame options, it churns out better video.
Because the Pixel 3 and 3A have the same camera, photo quality is still excellent. Images are clear, bright and vibrant. You can still take portraits with that dramatic, depth-of-field effect and adjust the focus and blur of the picture after you take the shot. Though I liked how colors on the Pixel 3A were more accurate in portrait shots, the contrast between the fore- and background is higher compared to the iPhone XR and Galaxy S10E. This can make the subject look artificial and superimposed. The Pixel 3A also didn't always nail down hair strands exactly right, and you can see patchiness around my head. For more about the phone's camera, check out the slideshow below, as well as CNET's deep-dive camera comparisons.
The Pixel 3A runs Android Pie, but can be updated to Android 10. Google didn't add a whole lot of new things in terms of software, but the phone does come with the nifty AR walking navigation tool in Google Maps right out of the box.
I was able to test an early version of the feature, and I found it especially useful when I first started navigating and had to orient myself. It helped solve my main issue with walking Maps directions, which is determining the correct direction to head towards. After getting confirmation from Maps that I'm indeed going the right way, I could put the phone down until I got a buzz for the next step. If I held the phone up for too long, the app reminded me to put the Pixel down. As someone with a terrible sense of direction, I'm looking forward to seeing this roll out to other phones.
The Pixel 3A and Pixel 3A XL have the same Snapdragon 670 processor, which is less powerful than the Snapdragon 855 in the Pixel 3. But Google reoptimized the software to work with this chipset, and I didn't feel any slowdown with speed or performance.
Don't get me wrong, on paper the Pixel 3A XL had lower benchmark scores than the Pixel 3 of course, as well as other "budget option" handsets from Google's competitors. (During our testing, the only phone it consistently beat was the Moto G7, which has a slower Snapdragon 632 processor.) But during my time with it so far, day-to-day usage didn't feel much different from the Pixel 3. Photo modes that required extra processing time, like HDR Plus Enhanced, Night Sight or making the screen flash for the front-facing camera, all felt like they took the same amount of time as before too.
As for battery, Google bumped up the capacity in the new Pixels. Lab tests showed that the Pixel 3A had a slightly longer battery life than the Pixel 3. With continuous video playback on Airplane mode, the Pixel 3A lasted an average of 16 hours, 35 minutes while the Pixel 3 clocked in 15 hours. Sixteen hours is quite impressive, and it puts it about on par with the Galaxy S10E and OnePlus 6T. The iPhone XR, however, lasted nearly 20 hours.
|Google Pixel 3A||Google Pixel 3||Samsung Galaxy S10E||OnePlus 6T||Apple iPhone XR|
|Display size, resolution||5.6-inch gOLED; 2,220x1,080 pixels||5.5-inch pOLED; 2,280x1,080 pixels||5.8-inch AMOLED; 2,280x1,080-pixels||6.41-inch AMOLED; 2,340x1,080 pixels||6.1-inch LCD Retina Display; 1,792x828 pixels|
|Pixel density||441 ppi||443 ppi||438 ppi||402 ppi||326 ppi|
|Dimensions (Inches)||6x2.8x0.3 in||5.7x2.7x0.3 in||5.6x2.8x0.27 in||6.20x2.94x0.32 in||5.9x3.0x0.33 in|
|Dimensions (Millimeters)||151x70x8.2mm||146x68x7.9 mm||142x70x7.9 mm||157.5x74.8x8.2 mm||150.9x75.7x8.3 mm|
|Weight (Ounces, Grams)||5.19 oz; 147g||5.2 oz; 148g||5.3oz; 150g||6.5 oz; 185 g||6.8oz; 194g|
|Mobile software||Android 9.0 Pie||Android 9 Pie||Android 9.0 Pie with Samsung One UI||Android 9.0 Pie||iOS 12|
|Camera||12.2-megapixel||12.2-megapixel||12-megapixel (wide-angle), 16-megapixel (ultra wide-angle)||16-megapixel (standard), 20-megapixel (telephoto)||12-megapixel|
|Front-facing camera||8-megapixel||Dual 8-megapixel||10-megapixel||16-megapixel||7-megapixel with Face ID|
|Processor||2GHz Qualcomm Snapdraon 670||2.5GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 845||Qualcomm Snapdragon 855||2.8GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 845||Apple A12 Bionic|
|Storage||64GB||64GB, 128GB||128GB, 256GB||128GB, 256GB||64GB, 128GB, 256GB|
|RAM||4GB||4GB||6GB, 8GB||6GB, 8GB||Not disclosed|
|Expandable storage||None||None||Up to 512GB||None||None|
|Battery||3,000 mAh||2,915 mAh||3,100 mAh||3,700 mAh||2,942 mAh (not disclosed by Apple)|
|Fingerprint sensor||Back||Back||Power button||In-display||None (Face ID)|
|Special features||AR in Google Maps, Timelapse video shooting||Water resistant (IPX8), wireless charging support, Pixel Buds USB-C headphones in the box||Wireless PowerShare, hole punch screen notch, water resistant (IP68), Fast Wireless Charging 2.0||In-display fingerprint sensor, dual-SIM, Dash Charging, notifications toggle||Water resistant (IP67), dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM), wireless charging, Face ID, Memoji|
|Price off-contract (USD)*||$399||$799 (64GB), $899 (128GB)||$750||$549 (6GB RAM/128GB), $579 (8GB RAM/128GB), $629 (8GB RAM/256GB)||$749 (64GB), $799 (128GB), $899 (256GB)|
|Price (GBP)*||£399||£739 (64GB), £839 (128GB)||£669||£499 (6GB RAM/128GB), £529 (8GB RAM/128GB), £579 (8GB RAM/256GB)||£749 (64GB), £799 (128GB), £899 (256GB)|
|Price (AUD)*||AU$649||AU$1,199 (64GB), AU$1,349 (128GB)||AU$1,199||Converted: AU$774 (6GB RAM/128GB), AU$817 (8GB RAM/128GB), AU$887 (8GB RAM/256GB)||AU$1,229 (64GB), AU$1,299 (128GB), AU$1,479 (256GB)|
Prices at launch*