After years developing and implementing extensive tests, we've fine-tuned our vacuum testing process. Here are our top picks for the best robot vacuums of 2023.
A good robot vacuum makes it easy to keep your floors clean at home, and after countless hours of tests, we think the Dreametech DreameBot D10 Plus is the best pick for most people. Still, finding the right robot for the job is easier said than done. Shop around, and you'll find an abundance of options, including well-designed budget picks as well as models with tempting upgrades like self-emptying bins, built-in mopping capabilities and advanced AI image recognition for elite-level obstacle avoidance.
Every home is different, so the best robot vacuums are versatile enough to handle a variety of housecleaning scenarios. They can keep hardwood, tile, carpet and rugs spick and span. They can handle pet hair and navigate intelligently around furniture or other obstacles. They can find their way from room to room to clean exactly where you want, when you want. Some have powerful suction that even rivals that of handheld vacuums. You'll need to keep an eye on your budget, though, because robot vacs can set you back more than a traditional vacuum. Some higher-end models cost upwards of four figures; fortunately, we can recommend plenty of perfectly capable cleaners that cost a lot less.
To find the best bots for your buck, we've spent the last several years torture-testing the top robotic vacuums in our lab and in our homes. With a variety of controlled tests at our disposal, we evaluate them for their suction power, navigation smarts, ease of use and their ability to clean different kinds of messes from carpets and hardwood floors alike. And yes, we even put them through the poop test.
Among those top models are flagship cleaners from companies like iRobot, Roborock and Neato, as well as compelling picks from lesser-known upstart brands. CNET will continue to test robot vacuums and update this best robot vacuum list periodically as new models become available -- for now, let's get right to the top models we'd currently point you toward.
I'll admit that I was initially skeptical of the DreameBot D10 Plus. At a retail price of $400, it offers features like a self-emptying dustbin and a built-in mopping pad, while costing hundreds less than comparably equipped cleaners. Too good to be true? A dream, you might say?
Turns out, no! Though it wasn't the best at any of the skills in our slate of tests, it was powerful and versatile enough to keep up with the competition at just about every turn. It's right on par with the top robot vacuums we test on low-pile and midpile carpets, and it outperformed every other cleaner on hardwood floors except for
All of that is well worth the $500 or more that you'd spend for a comparable, self-emptying, mopping-ready model from the likes of Roomba, Roborock, or any other top brand -- but again, the DreameBot D10 Plus is available for less than $400. That makes this highly-versatile floor-cleaner a top value pick, and an easy recommendation for the very top of our list.
With a competitive price plus rock-solid performance and intelligent navigation, the Roborock S7 is a clear top-pick among midrange robot vacuums. It's our overall top-rated cleaner on low-pile carpet, and it boasts competitive averages on hardwood floors and midpile carpet, too. On top of that, it features a built-in mopping pad, which is great to have on hand in the kitchen. It isn't inexpensive at $650, but it's regularly on sale (including right now, where you can knock a whopping $240 off of the price
Aided by multiple sensors and lasers, efficient navigation is the S7's other strong suit. The vacuum cleaner covered the entire floor of our test room without missing any spots across multiple runs in an average of just 16 minutes. That's a full 9 minutes shorter than the Roomba S9 Plus required for the same job.
The lack of a self-emptying bin is a bit of a bummer here, but you've got other good options if that's what matters most (and you can always step up to the
And here's the big boy, both in size and in price. At $1,400, the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra offers a bona fide battle station against messy floors, with both a self-emptying bin for vacuumed dust and debris as well as dual water tanks, one for fresh cleaning solution and another for dirty water. It even washes itself after each mopping run. Add in the lidar navigation smarts plus 3D-mapping cameras capable of object recognition for top-tier obstacle avoidance, as well as a mopping pad that lifts up into the cleaner whenever carpets are detected below, and you're looking at one of the most luxurious, fully automated floor-cleaners on the market.
Wouldn't you know it, the thing cleans pretty well, too. It's our no. 4-ranked cleaner on low-pile carpets, and it was able to suck an impressive 56% of sand from more plush, midpile carpets. It's less of a standout when it vacuums hardwood floors, but Roborock makes up for it with the fully automated mopping, which is aided in turn by the best-in-class navigation capabilities (good navigation is essential for successful mopping runs). Roborock also offers one of the most comprehensive control apps you'll find, offering room-by-room cleaning smarts, Alexa, Google Assistant and Siri Shortcut voice support, and even the option to review the precise path your cleaner took on its most recent run.
Yes, the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra is a major splurge at $1,400, but it's also the robotic cleaner that felt the most like an upgrade pick during our tests. If you're looking to spend big on a hypercapable floor-cleaner, this one fits the bill.
We made some major upgrades to our lab's robot vacuum test setup a few years ago, so the data from the tests that came before aren't directly comparable to our most recent models. That's a shame, because the iRobot Roomba S9 Plus was a major standout from that earlier era -- particularly for its eye-popping performance on thick, plush carpets.
The biggest challenge in those midpile carpet tests is picking up sand, which has an excess of fabric and fibers to cling to as the vacuum tries to suck it up. I mentioned that 50% is a good benchmark in that test, and the best cleaner in that challenge from our last two years of tests is the
On top of that, the S9 Plus aced our pet hair pickup tests, where we scatter clumps of actual pet hair donated from a friendly local groomer across all of our test floors. The Roomba S9 Plus didn't miss a single clump. It isn't as much of a standout on hardwood floors, and it doesn't include a mop at all, but if your home is filled with plush carpets and your pets are having a field day shedding fur across them, then the self-emptying Roomba S9 Plus is a perfect pick for your home.
While we're talking about pets, let's stop for a moment to consider the robo vac's mortal enemy: pet waste. If your dog makes a mess and your robot vac stumbles across it before you do, you might end up with a poo-pocalypse all over your floors (that link is safe to click, by the way, and worth it if only to read a hall-of-fame-worthy CNET lede from David Katzmaier).
Fortunately, iRobot scrambled to come up with a solution. The answer? AI-powered cameras capable of recognizing and avoiding obstacles -- including piles of dog poop -- as it cleans. Its first feces-defying flagship was the Roomba J7 Plus, and sure enough, when we tested it out against an armada of unnervingly convincing fake dog poop samples, it steered clear at every turn. Meanwhile, the Samsung JetBot AI Plus promises the same poop-detecting smarts but failed to dodge the doo-doo in our tests. Advantage, iRobot.
Aside from not pushing poop across your floors, the Roomba J7 Plus excels at other things, too. It doesn't feature a built-in mop, but it's a semi-affordable self-emptying option, and an exceedingly well-rounded cleaner, boasting top three averages on both hardwood floor and low-pile carpets. It fell short on plush, midpile carpets, so go with the
So, I mentioned that the otherwise excellent
To test that out, I took the Roomba Combo J7 Plus home, where I have a mix of carpets and hardwood floors. It did a great job of identifying carpeted areas during its initial mapping run -- from there, I never caught it vacuuming those carpeted areas without lifting the mop up and out of the way first. It's just a better, more high-end approach to automated mopping, and one you won't need to think about quite as much.
It's a capable vacuum, too, and a top-five finisher on all three flooring types we test, which is something that only one other robot vacuum we've tested can claim (the also-excellent
You might not expect sufficient cleaning power from a budget-priced robot vacuum, but that's precisely what the Anker Eufy RoboVac 25C delivers. For instance, its ability to scour sand from hardwood floors (78.9%) wasn't too far below that of the
So how did Anker cut down on costs here, anyway? The answer is navigation. Instead of relying on cameras or lasers to map out its environment, the machine bumps around the floor like a slow-motion ping-pong ball, changing direction when it encounters an object or obstacle. As a result, it took an excessive 91 minutes to finish its cleaning cycle in our test room, so don't expect it to cover your house in anything close to efficient fashion. Still, that's more than a fair tradeoff at this bargain-bin price, especially considering what a surprisingly competitive cleaner the thing is.
It doesn't come with a self-emptying bin, but that's pretty much where my criticism of the Neato D8 ends. A top-performing model from years past that still holds up well against its newest competitors, the D-shaped robot vacuum is currently down to $199 on Amazon. That's simply an outstanding value given that this thing cleans floors just about as well as you could expect from a robot vacuum.
How well? Let's summarize: It's our fourth-ranked cleaner, overall, on hardwood floors. Make that third on thick, plushy midpile carpets. Its ranking fell slightly on low-pile carpet, where I like to see cleaners that can pick up at least 50% of the sand we use to simulate fine particles -- the D8 finished with 48% in that test. Overall, that's a better batting average than most, and again, you're getting that level of performance for just $199. It's a great pick for pet owners, too, with an optional set of accessories designed to help maximize pet hair pickup. Did I mention that Neato boasts highly consistent navigation chops thanks to the company's lidar laser mastery, and that it supports Alexa and Google voice commands?
All of that said, there's some very important context here, and that's the fact that Neato's parent company Vorwerk recently announced that it was shutting the Neato line down for good. That's a real shame, but the good news is that the company is also promising a minimum of five years of product and service support, including the availability of replacement parts and important software updates to keep those cloud connections secure. That means that Neato remains a viable option for the time being. Bottom line: If you can live without a built-in mop or a self-emptying bin, this is one of the best robot vacuum values currently running.
Each robot vacuum we consider for recommendation gets put through its paces in our test lab in Louisville, Kentucky. In addition to test floors where we run our controlled pickup tests, we monitor each robot vacuum in a special test room filled with mock furniture to gauge how well it navigates around common obstacles. Past that, we check each robot vacuum's ability to gobble up pet hair without getting clogged or leaving loose strands behind, we take mopping capabilities into consideration, and we check to see how well it navigates against fake dog messes, too.
Let's dive a little deeper into the main considerations, starting with our performance tests.
When it comes to vacuuming prowess, we want to know how effective each robot is against common crumbs and other debris, and also how it fares against much smaller particles like dust, dirt and sand. To find out, we use dry, uncooked black rice as a stand-in for the crumbs, and sand as an analogue for finer particles.
In each case, we scatter a controlled amount across three test floors: low-pile carpet, midpile carpet and hardwood floors. Then, we take the robot vacuum, thoroughly empty its dust bin, send it to clean the affected area, and finally measure the weight of whatever it managed to pick up. That gives us a pickup percentage of the full amount -- from there, we repeat each run two more times and average the results.
Speaking of results, the graph above shows you how each cleaner we've tested over the past few years stacks up on hardwood floors. The iRobot Roomba Combo J7 Plus is our top-tested cleaner on that surface, picking up averages of 98% of crumbs and an extra-impressive 100% of sand. Right behind it is our top recommendation, the Dreametech DreameBot D10 Plus, which earned a close second place finish on hardwood floors despite retailing for less than half as much as the top-finishing Roomba Combo J7 Plus.
Next up is low-pile carpet. Along with the fact that the orange bars are a lot shorter (vacuuming sand is a bigger challenge on carpets than on hardwood floors because of all the fibers the sand can cling to), note that the order of cleaners is different, with our top midrange pick, the Roborock S7, now leading the way. Different robot vacuums will have different strengths and weaknesses based on their designs, so our variety of tests help us make recommendations that are as informed and well-rounded as possible.
Finally, our midpile carpet results. Neato cleaned up in this test, with the Neato D9 leading all of our CNET-tested cleaners overall and the less-expensive Neato D8 coming in third overall. In between them is the iRobot Roomba Combo J7 Plus in second place. As with the low-pile tests, note that most of the cleaners in the top half of the graph are all relatively close to one another -- it isn't until you get to the bottom of the pack that those bars really start to shrink. That's good for you as a consumer, because it means that you've got a good variety of robot vacuums to choose from that all offer comparable cleaning capabilities across various price points.
One other reminder: These graphs cover the robot vacuums we've tested in the past few years. Robot vacuums we tested prior to that span used a slightly different test setup, so the data from those tests isn't directly comparable. I've made sure to point out the past performers that are still good buys, most notably the iRobot Roomba S9 Plus, which did particularly well on midpile carpets and remains one of our top recommendations.
Your robot vacuum will only clean your home as thoroughly as it's capable of navigating it. The ideal cleaner will make easy work of finding its way from room to room and automatically avoiding obstacles along the way, all of which makes for proper, low-maintenance automated cleaning.
We make sure to observe each robot vacuum as it cleans in order to get a good sense of how well it navigates, but to get the best comparison from cleaner to cleaner, we take overhead long exposure shots of each one as it cleans our darkened test room, with glow sticks attached to the top of each one directly above the vacuum intake. The images that result show us light trails that reveal the robot's path as it navigates the room and cleans around our mock furniture. The GIF above shows you a quick succession of three of these images for our top splurge pick, the Roborock S7 MaxV Ultra. As you can clearly see, it's incredibly thorough and consistent from run to run, and an expert at running circles around the legs of our test furniture.
Now, compare that to this next GIF, which shows you three runs from our top mopping pick, the iRobot Roomba Combo J7 Plus. Notice the difference? The Roomba was less effective at covering the entire room, missing the bottom-left corner in two out of three runs, and it had plenty of difficulty providing adequate coverage around the legs of that mock dining table, too.
So, what gives? In large part, it comes down to the tech at play. Over the years, we've consistently noted that robot vacuums that use laser-guided lidar navigation tend to be very good at mapping their environment and finding their way around. Meanwhile, 3D-mapping cameras with object recognition smarts can give robot vacuums an extra ability to identify and adapt to obstacles in their path. The Roborock S7 MaxV uses both technologies, which helps explain why it performs so well here. Meanwhile, the Roomba relies on cameras and sensors alone, with lasers left out of the mix.
Still, those cameras definitely come in handy. Just watch the above GIF, which shows what happened when we put the iRobot Roomba J7 Plus to the test -- specifically, its promise of identifying and avoiding pet waste. With a variety of (I assure you, fake) dog poop scattered about a small, enclosed test floor, the Roomba did its best to vacuum the area without touching any of them. It succeeded, never bumping into any of our disgusting-looking test turds at all.
Now, compare that with the Samsung JetBot AI Plus, which also promises to use its cameras to spot and avoid pet droppings. The result was, well, not great -- in each test run, it would eventually bump into one of our test piles. Thank goodness they weren't real.
You've seen our top picks and our test data -- now, here's a quick rundown of the rest of the robot vacuums we've tested in recent years, some of which are still worthy of consideration for some shoppers:
Designed to navigate your home and clean your floors automatically, robot vacuum cleaners are made to tackle this chore so you don't have to. They can clean on demand, on a schedule and even when you're not home. Powered by rechargeable batteries, the robot typically sits on a charging dock to top off its energy supply. Premium models come with docking stations that can also empty the robot's dustbin when it's full.
Robot vacuums are complex machines with more moving parts, electronics and software than ordinary vacuums. Still, with regular maintenance and replacement parts such as batteries, brushes and filters, these devices can last just as long as traditional vacuums. This should translate to multiple years of use.
Keep in mind that manufacturers typically cover their robots with one-year limited warranties that include parts and labor. IRobot, Neato and Samsung are examples.
How well a robot vacuum cleans your home depends on many factors. Floors cluttered with obstacles like wires, charging cords, toys, shoes and clothing can stop robots in their tracks. The less overall clutter the better a robot will operate. Some robot vacuum models clean tile, wood flooring and different types of carpet better than others.