DxO Labs' latest image sensor tests show that medium-format digital camera sensors don't hold a huge lead over top SLRs.
Stephen Shanklandprincipal writer
Stephen Shankland has been a reporter at CNET since 1998 and writes about processors, digital photography, AI, quantum computing, computer science, materials science, supercomputers, drones, browsers, 3D printing, USB, and new computing technology in general. He has a soft spot in his heart for standards groups and I/O interfaces. His first big scoop was about radioactive cat poop.
Expertiseprocessors, semiconductors, web browsers, quantum computing, supercomputers, AI, 3D printing, drones, computer science, physics, programming, materials science, USB, UWB, Android, digital photography, scienceCredentials
I've been covering the technology industry for 24 years and was a science writer for five years before that. I've got deep expertise in microprocessors, digital photography, computer hardware and software, internet standards, web technology, and other dee
It looks like Canon and Nikon weren't blowing smoke when they said their high-end SLRs cameras will compete with medium-format digital cameras used almost exclusively by professionals.
Given the image quality advantages that SLRs with larger "full-frame" sensors have over mainstream and much less expensive models with smaller processors, one might have expected another quantum leap from costly high-end medium-format digital cameras with sensors twice the area of top-end SLRs. Not so, according to new DxOMark Sensor test results set for release Tuesday by French test and measurement firm DxO Labs.
The company tested image sensors from several medium-format cameras--the Mamiya ZD Back, Leaf Aptus 75S, Hasselblad H3DII 39, and Phase One P45+. These are the sorts of cameras used by fashion photographers and others who need lush tones, fine detail, and lots of megapixels to handle big photos such as magazine spreads.
These medium-format cameras' overall scores were lowered by their poor low-light performance, but these cameras are generally used by studio photographers with carefully controlled lighting, so that in and of itself isn't a big factor. However, even overlooking that, high-end SLRs were competitive on the other attributes.
"We had expected that given their large-size pixel they would perform much better on dynamic range and color depth than digital SLRs," said spokesman Nicolas Touchard.
Don't judge a camera solely by its DxO Mark score; many other factors ranging from price, autofocus, and lenses also are highly pertinent.
And bear in mind that DxO only checked a handful of medium-format models, and not the latest ones at that. For example, Hasselblad has begun selling a 50-megapixel model and plans to release a 60-megapixel one in 2009, and Phase One offers a "back,"<="" a="" rel="nofollow" class="c-regularLink" target="_blank"> a sensor housing that fits to medium-format camera body. Leaf's Aptus II backs employ even larger 56x36mm sensors and reach 56 megapixels.
Even in the film era, medium-format cameras were rarer and more expensive than 35mm film rivals. But in the digital era, the competitive dynamics have tilted more in favor of conventional SLRs, because the cost of producing image sensors gets dramatically higher as the sensors get larger.