Car Industry

Study Says Corn-Based Ethanol 24% More Carbon Intensive Than Gasoline

This research seems to contradict published findings from the USDA, though it is more holistic in its approach.

Fill 'er up!
Tom Merton/Getty Images

A decade or so ago, corn-based ethanol was heralded as a fuel of the future, an eco-friendly replacement for gasoline that would allow us to have our proverbial cake and eat it, too. The future seemed clean and bright, but according to a study published on Monday by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, powering our vehicles with corn-based alcohol may have done more harm than good.

Initially reported by Reuters, this research paper indicates that the carbon intensity of corn-based ethanol is "likely at least 24% higher" than conventional gasoline, not a promising figure. This study investigates the use of land and water resources in the US during eight years of the government's Renewable Fuel Standard program, from 2008 to 2016. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, "The RFS… is a national policy that requires a certain volume of renewable fuel to replace or reduce the quantity of petroleum-based transportation fuel, heating oil or jet fuel."

But how is seemingly clean corn-based ethanol so much worse than gasoline? When you factor in drilling, refining and transporting them, petroleum-based fuels are plenty dirty. Taking a holistic approach, this study looks at a range of things: "Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States." In other words, researchers looked at a lot more than just, say, the stuff that comes out of a car's tailpipe.

According to this research, the RFS increased demand for corn, which boosted its cultivation by 8.7% and the use of fertilizer by up to 8%. This degraded ecosystem carbon stocks and resulted in more nitrate leaching, greater phosphorus runoff and increased soil erosion, but that's not all. Researchers estimate the RFS also increased corn prices by a whopping 30% and the costs of other crops by 20%.

These findings contradict a 2019 study by the US Department of Agriculture, which claims corn-based ethanol is far cleaner than petroleum, resulting in 39% fewer greenhouse gas emissions than gasoline. However, it appears that study did not factor land use into its calculations.

Each year, the RFS has required an ever-increasing amount of renewable energy to be used. In 2022, 36 billion gallons will need to be produced. This sounds like a good thing for the environment, but in reality, it may be quite the opposite. As the study indicates "…our findings confirm that contemporary corn ethanol production is unlikely to contribute to climate change mitigation." If fuels like cellulosic ethanol or biomass-based diesel can be scaled up, the story might be different, but for now those options seem limited.

Neither the USDA nor the Renewable Fuels Association responded to Roadshow's request for comment before this story was published. 

Now playing: Watch this: 2024 Chevy Silverado EV is ready to ride the Lightning