The great Fast and Furious rewatch: Pedal to the metal on the road to F9
How I learned to stop worrying and love America's greatest modern action-movie series in time for Fast and Furious 9.
Tim StevensFormer editor at large for CNET Cars
Tim Stevens got his start writing professionally while still in school in the mid '90s, and since then has covered topics ranging from business process management to video game development to automotive technology.
Fast and Furious 9 has exploded into theaters. From the ridiculous opening chase to the fan-pleasing post-credits scene, F9 is packed with all the absurd stunts, smoldering acting and over-the-top action you expect from the Fast and Furious franchise. But how did we get here?
I'm sorry to say it, but the Fast and Furious franchise doesn't exactly make a great first impression. In that initial 2001 film, The Fast and the Furious, the dialogue is bad, the racing is questionable and there's no shortage of cringe-worthy moments. When I saw that film back in theaters, I didn't take to it the same way that many of my friends in the automotive-enthusiast landscape did. Sure, I loved Supras and GT-Rs as much as the next person, but I just could not get my head around why everyone adored this four-wheeled Point Break knockoff.
Still, I saw the second movie when it came out, but it didn't change my mind on the franchise. I gave up on it. I wrote the rest of the films off and it was years before I bothered seeing Tokyo Drift.
Now, two decades after that first film's release, here I am to admit that I was wrong. I've now seen all the films at least twice and groaned through every one of the recycled soap opera tropes. (Presumed dead but resurrected with no memory? Check. Beloved character becomes inexplicably evil and starts dressing in black? Check. Surprise son from relationship that ended two movies ago? Check and check.) Somewhere between the floor inexplicably falling off of Brian's Eclipse in 2001's The Fast and the Furious and a nuclear submarine surfacing in 2017's The Fate of the Furious, I've come to really enjoy the series, and I am properly pumped for the new one.
So what changed? It's a little hard to put my finger on it, to be honest. To try and find that spot, the moment in the run when I stopped dreading the next one and started eagerly awaiting them, I rewatched every film with my wife. Why with her? She'd not seen a single one of the movies and frankly had little interest in doing so, despite us both having an unabashed love for bad cinema. Sometimes, seeing something again through the eyes of someone else is the best way to renew your own appreciation.
That raised the question of where to introduce her. Should I run through in release order and let her first impression be the truly crummy original film? Should I start at the franchise's early high-point, the genuinely good Tokyo Drift, thus leaving her confused about timeline abnormalities? Or, should I go in chronological order, shuffling Tokyo Drift back until well late in the sequence?
I decided to set the hook early with Tokyo Drift, my favorite film of the series and one that's honestly pretty hard to fault. This is a a view shared by The Drive Deputy Editor and franchise guru Kristen Lee. I talked with her about my decision and she agreed this is the way to go. "I think it's definitely the least problematic of the early F&F movies," Lee told me, calling out the "weird misogyny" and casual profanity in the first film as stumbling blocks for first-time viewers. "I think Tokyo Drift goes down the easiest," she said.
Drift also prominently features Han, a character with a strong role in many of the other films, but is most developed here. Lee calls him "the best character in the entire franchise" and it's hard to disagree. (If you're a Han fan, don't miss her excellent interview of actor Sung Kang here.)
On my Tokyo Drift rewatch, immediately I realized it was this movie, the third theatrically but sixth chronologically, that really made me appreciate the series. Here we not only saw a film with legitimate development in a likable character, but genuinely good cars presented in a knowledgeable way. The finishing touch? The cameo from the real Drift King, Keiichi Tsuchiya, who did a good portion of the stunt driving. It's a film that not only respects its subject matter but its characters in a way that the prior two films kinda didn't.
From there it was back to the beginning. Even on my third viewing I confess I struggled to find much merit in The Fast and the Furious. It's hard to overstate the significance this film had on the import tuner scene of the early 2000s, bringing to the mainstream niche cars that many of us obsessed over in Gran Turismo and Best Motoring bootlegs. I respect this film for having that impact despite being so very schlocky.
The second film doesn't do much more for me, but here we see the beginnings of the big heist and the chemistry that would go on to become the true hallmark of the series. Crucially, this film introduces the characters of Roman Pearce (Tyrese Gibson) and Tej Parker (Chris "Ludacris" Bridges), who bring the humor that carries every subsequent film in which they appear. Otherwise, 2 Fast 2 Furious is pretty forgettable, lacking even the memorably bad, meme-ready one-liners of the first film.
At this point my wife was understandably underwhelmed, but she soldiered on with me promising bigger and better to come. Next was Fast and Furious. It's in this film that the original cast finally returns, while Roman and Tej sadly take a bye. Still, you can feel the momentum growing. There's no heist as such, more a revenge-filled slaughter, but some of the key concepts of the films, family and respect, finally stop being catchphrases and actually start to mean something.
That film flows directly into Fast Five, and it's here I think where, for better or worse, the franchise really finds its Hollywood legs. The original crew is united with the crew from 2 Fast 2 Furious, Dwayne Johnson makes an unlikely appearance, and yet somehow the on-screen chemistry across the board is solid. The family has grown massively, but not as much as the budget. The first film had a budget of $36 million. That figure crept up gradually and by the time Fast and Furious came around it was up to $85 million. Fast Five? The budget made a 50% leap to $125 million. And you can see it. The sequence featuring a pair of Dodge Charger SRT8s dragging a shipping container through Rio de Janeiro is perhaps my favorite of the entire series.
Fast Five marks a massive tonal change in the franchise, a shift that leaves many dedicated fans cold. Kristen Lee told me she thinks the series should have ended here: "They went from movies about a very specific niche/era of car culture to international heist movies and frankly those are a dime a dozen. I watch the latter ones for the sheer ridiculousness of it, but the intimate honesty that spoke to gear-heads from the early movies -- that validated our love of cars and car culture on the big screen -- just isn't there anymore."
You can't argue with that point, but where the early films often struggled with misogyny and fragmented narratives, the later films at least paint a more inclusive and engaging experience. And they're a hell of a lot of fun -- if you can get to the point where you stop shaking your head at the ridiculousness of it all and start appreciating the bent rules of physics. Things like: You can survive a fall from any height so long as you land on the roof of a car. Or: A single, lightweight truck can pull a Blackhawk helicopter (capable of lifting 9,000 pounds) so long as that truck has two bottles of nitrous oxide under the hood.
By Fast Five, my wife was genuinely hooked, eager to watch the remaining films and even continue on to spinoff Hobbs and Shaw. The films from here just keep gaining momentum and swagger until they reach outrageous levels that somehow still work.
So what about F9 and its estimated $200 million budget? Will it keep building the momentum? I confess to being a bit skeptical. Chris Morgan, writer of all my favorite films in the series, has stepped aside. In his place, F9 has three credited writers, including director Justin Lin. Writing by committee doesn't typically result in compelling cinema, but then most people aren't going to see F&F films for their thematic nuance. Although CNET's film critic Richard Trenholm called the film "The Godfather II of cartoon car crash movies", so who knows?
Regardless of how the new film turns out, and which soap opera tropes it entails (evil twin? babies switched at birth? demonic possession?) I cannot wait to see what blows up and which cars are caught in the crossfire. And I really can't wait to experience it with the franchise's latest fan: my wife.