X

Vizio E3D0VX review: Vizio E3D0VX

Vizio E3D0VX

David_Katzmaier.jpg
David Katzmaier
David_Katzmaier.jpg

David Katzmaier

Editorial Director -- TVs and streaming

David has reviewed TVs, streaming services, streaming devices and home entertainment gear at CNET since 2002. He is an ISF certified, NIST trained calibrator and developed CNET's TV test procedure himself. Previously David wrote reviews and features for Sound & Vision magazine and eTown.com. He is known to two people on Twitter as "The Cormac McCarthy of consumer electronics."

See full bio
4 min read

Vizio E3D420VX
6.8

Vizio E3D0VX

The Good

The <b>Vizio E3D0VX</b> series is inexpensive for a 3D TV. It produces accurate color and its matte screen helps reduce reflections in bright rooms. The TV's feature set is superb, including a QWERTY remote control, built-in Wi-Fi and an Internet TV suite with numerous content options. Passive 3D on this TV has fewer artifacts than LG's version, minimal crosstalk, is brighter than active, and Vizio includes two pairs of lightweight, nonpowered glasses.

The Bad

The Vizio's 2D picture quality falls short of many entry-level competitors, mainly because it produces a significantly lighter shade of black. It can't properly reproduce 1080p/24 cadence and off-angle viewing is poor. The design of its Internet content menus can make services difficult to access, and its external styling is lackluster. Passive 3D shows visible line structure and a slightly softer image than LG's version.

The Bottom Line

The Vizio E3D0VX series has excellent features for the price, including 3D and robust streaming, but its 2D picture quality is a big Achilles' heel.

If you want the most features for your TV buck, look no further than Vizio's E3D0VX series. It's the least expensive 1080p 3D TV on the market--yeah, entry-level 720p 3D plasmas from Samsung and LG cost less but don't include active glasses, while Sony's PlayStation TV is just 24 inches. The Vizio also sports a well-equipped Internet package, complete with content galore, built-in Wi-Fi and, yes, a remote equipped with a QWERTY keyboard on the flip side. About the only thing missing is an LED backlight.

The downside is that the Vizio's disappointing 2D picture can't match that of many basic-featured competitors that cost less. If you can overlook that significant flaw and actually want 3D, you'll find Vizio's E3D0VX plenty appealing.

Series information: We performed a hands-on evaluation of the 42-inch Vizio E3D420VX, but this review also applies to the other screen sizes in the series. All sizes have identical specs and according to the manufacturer should provide very similar picture quality.

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Models in series (details)
Vizio E3D320VX 32 inches
Vizio E3D420VX (reviewed) 42 inches
Vizio E3D470VX 47 inches

Design


The stand doesn't swivel, and that dimple in the middle is a bit weird.

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Design highlights
Panel depth 3.4 inches Bezel width 1.75 inches
Single-plane face No Swivel stand No

The chunky Vizio E3D0VX series won't win any beauty contests. It follows the company's familiar aesthetic of the last year or two: a glossy black frame with a thick perforated speaker grille along the bottom. There's a strange dimple in the middle of the grille, which at first glance seemed like a dent caused by damage during shipping.

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Remote control and menus
Remote size (LxW) 6.25 x 2.1 inches QWERTY keyboardYes
Illuminated keys No IR device control No
Menu item explanations Yes Onscreen manual No

The remote and menus E3D0VX series are very good and surpass in many ways the efforts of more well-known brands, especially at this price.


We were excited (in the nerdiest possible fashion) when we saw that the backside of Vizio's remote had a QWERTY keyboard. It's better than the previous version found on models like the XVT3SV, with more responsive keys, an easier typing experience and no flimsy slide-up action. It's still not as good as the QWERTY clicker included on Samsung's expensive D8000 series, mainly because it doesn't have a backlight (making use impossible in the dark) and it works via infrared instead of Bluetooth--so you have to make sure to have line of sight between the Vizio remote and the TV. It's pretty darn good though, and obviously a much better value than the Samsung version.


The front side of the Vizio remote could be a lot better. It also lacks illumination, the menu/exit/guide/back keys are too small, there's not enough differentiation, and no direct button to switch aspect ratio. Its best feature is dedicated keys for Amazon Instant, Netflix and Vudu streaming services.

Vizio's menu system remains unchanged from the XVT3SV, and it's still very good. It resembles another app in appearance, and we liked that the picture settings section is actually integrated into the main App taskbar (see below). Responses were fast, explanations complete, and we had no problems finding our way around.

Features

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Key TV features
Display technology LCD LED backlight N/A
3D technology Passive 3D glasses included 2 pair
Screen finish Matte Internet connection Built-in wi-fi
Refresh rate(s) 120Hz Dejudder (smooth) processing Yes
DLNA-compliant No USB Music/Video

The Vizio E3D0VX series is the most fully loaded non-LED TV on the market. Its chief extra is the same kind of passive 3D found on LG's 2011 3D TVs--all of which are more expensive LED models that start at 47 inches. Check out our 3D TV Buying Guide for more on passive 3D and the Performance section of this review for details on the E3D0VX's implementation.

The E3D0VX includes two pairs of passive glasses instead of the four found on LG's TVs and more expensive Vizios. They don't match, either; one is the same curvy, glossy pair of spectacles included on those Vizios, while the other set is more generic-looking with flat lenses. The company sells additional (curvy) specs for $25 each on its Web site. Less expensive compatible circular polarized glasses are available from online merchants, and if you swipe a pair of passive 3D glasses from your local theater, they should work too.

We also appreciate that Vizio included built-in Wi-Fi, so you don't have to run a wire to the TV to take advantage of the Internet features. Unlike on earlier Vizios, Wi-Fi on this model worked well in our test environment.


"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Streaming and apps "="">Other: CinemaNow, Rhapsody, TuneIn radio, Flickr, numerous other Yahoo widgets
Netflix Yes YouTube No
Amazon Instant Yes Hulu Plus Yes
Vudu Yes Pandora Yes
Web browser No Skype No
Facebook Yes Twitter Yes

Vizio's Internet services suite, known as VIA, is our fourth-favorite among 2011 contenders, outdoing Sony by a nose but falling short of Panasonic, LG and Samsung. Content selection is very good; none of the major services go missing with the exception of YouTube. As for audio Vizio is still the only maker to include Rhapsody--a boon for subscribers but a big "meh" for everybody else.

The top three contenders on that list all improved their user experiences this year but Vizio did not; sticking to the same Yahoo widgets-based system it used last year. The main gateway consists of a strip along the bottom of the screen that shows just four widgets at a time, so finding the one you want is a tedious scrolling chore if you any more than 10 or so installed. Vizio doesn't make finding new widgets any easier, with a "gallery" that's crowed with entirely too much chaff, including way too many "apps" devoted to local TV stations.

On the other hand, we appreciated that unlike other connected TVs it can run two Apps simultaneously, allowing you to Tweet or check Facebook (or even browse Amazon Prime) while watching Netflix, for example. Think of it as TV multitasking, or just think of streaming services as another TV channel.


Vizio's services and widgets appear on a strip on the bottom of the screen.

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Picture settings
Adjustable picture modes 9 Fine dejudder control No
Color temperature presets 4 Fine color temperature control 2 points
Gamma presets 0 Color management system No

The selection here is adequate but not up to LG or Samsung's standards. There's a ridiculous number of picture modes, and all are adjustable per input, so viewers who like to create different settings for all kinds of material and sources will have a lot to like. We'd like to see gamma presets and especially the ability to adjust dejudder processing beyond the three presets, but neither is in the offing.

Most of the picture controls and all of the presets are also available when watching streaming video. Tweakers take note that the Ambient Light Sensor, which ships turned on by default, must be disabled before you can manually adjust the backlight setting.


A few advanced settings are available.

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Connectivity
HDMI inputs 2 back, 1 side Component video inputs 1 back
Composite video input(s) 1 back VGA-style PC input(s) 1
USB port 1 side Ethernet (LAN) port Yes

The Vizio features plenty of jacks for most setups, but better yet in our book is that composite, component and HDMI are clearly labeled "Good," "Better," and "Best" so novices can easily determine which connection to use.


We appreciate Vizio's input labeling.

Performance
In terms of 2D the picture quality of the Vizio is a dead ringer for that of the much less expensive LG LK450 series, characterized by poor black level performance and accurate color. That means that other entry-level TVs, like the Sony BX420 series and Samsung D550, provide superior 2D picture quality. In 3D the Vizio is an intriguing choice, with a couple of surprising advantages over LG's larger passive sets, but again its lighter blacks make it unsuitable for dim-room viewing.

Prior to calibration the Movie mode came closest to our ideal dim-room picture settings--but that's not saying much. Its color temperature in the Normal preset was too red, the picture was too dim, and gamma measured exceedingly dark--the latter two problems, we're guessing, a result of the TVs dynamic contrast and ambient light sensors being active by default. After disabling those and proceeding with our standard calibration we got good results. For our image quality tests we used the comparison lineup below and checked out "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1."

"="" bgcolor="#CCCCCC">Comparison models (details)
Samsung LN40D550 40-inch LCD
LG 42LK450 42-inch LCD
Sony KDL-40BX420 40-inch LCD
Samsung LN46D630 46-inch LCD
Insignia NS-42E859A11 42-inch LED-based LCD
LG 47LV5500 46-inch LED-based LCD
Panasonic TC-P50ST30 50-inch plasma

Black level: The Vizio tied with the LG LK450 for worst in our lineup at producing a deep shade of black. The difference was obvious between those two and the others in our dark room, and even visible in some scenes under bright ambient light. Dark areas, like the letterbox bars, deep shadows and recesses, or Voldemort's banquet hall (Chapter 2) showed the most obvious differences between those two and the rest of the lineup, making those dark areas appear washed out and much less impactful than the other TVs.

Details in shadows, such as the folds in Snape's robe (4:57) appeared neither obscured nor too blown-out, but again looked worse than the other displays because of those bright blacks.

Color accuracy: White its measurements aren't as razor-straight as the charts from LG's LK450, the color on the two TVs was remarkably similar--and generally excellent in terms of accuracy. In brighter areas like the faces of the good guys in Chapter 3 (12:15) skin tones, clothing and hair color looked more accurate than on the Samsung D550, the Insignia, the Panasonic and the Sony. On the other hand it lacked the punch and saturation of the D630 and colors in general were less rich and saturated than on the sets with better black levels.

Video processing: When fed a 1080p/24 source the E3D0VX failed to preserve the proper cadence, instead seeming to "catch" every second or so during the pan over the Intrepid from "I Am Legend." We disabled 1080p/24 on our Blu-ray player and the catch was replaced by the characteristic hitching stutter of 2:3 pull-down, an effect we preferred to the "catch." That's why we'd recommend disabling 1080p/24 on your Blu-ray player if you own this TV.

Uniformity: The screen of the E3D0VX didn't have any of the bright spots we saw on the Sony or the edge-lit LG and Insignia, maintaining its brightness and color well across its surface. From off-angle its blacks washed out quicker than any of the others, but on the flipside we didn't see as much discoloration as we did on the Samsungs, the Sony and the Insignia.

Bright lighting: The Vizio's matte screen serves it well in bright rooms where lights, windows and bright objects cause reflections. Such objects appeared dimmer and much less distinct, and thus less distracting, then they did on the Panasonic plasma, for example, and black levels were also preserved better. The rest of the sets in the lineup also have matte screens, and in general they all performed equally well in this category.

PC: Performance was excellent via VGA, with full resolution, no edge enhancement and excellent detail.

3D: For our 3D comparison we swapped out the majority of the TVs above (keeping only the Panasonic plasma) and added the Sony KDL-46EX720, the Samsung UN46D6400 and the LG 47LW5600. We watched "The Green Hornet" Blu-ray with all of the TVs set to their default Movie or Cinema modes.

In terms of the artifacts we've come to associate with passive 3D, we actually found the 42-inch Vizio E3D420VX better than the 47-inch LG 47LW5600. We suspect some of the difference has to do with the Vizio's smaller screen size, not because smaller screens make artifacts less visible but because there may be some difference in the way the two sizes' FPR renders 3D. As usual for our tests, we did our best to compensate for purely size-based differences by staggering the seating distance of the two--the Vizio was about 7.5 feet away and the LG about 8.5.

Even so, jagged edges along lines were less prevalent on the Vizio than the LG. When Britt got into the limo after the funeral, for example, the LG showed uneven edges along Chudnofsky's suit (13:38) and even more noticeably on the edge of the sunlit seat in the background behind Britt (13:47). On the Vizio the suit and bottom of the seat looked very slightly softer than the LG, but line structure was much less evident, even when we moved even closer to the screen to look for it. Again at 14:05, as the camera tilted slightly we saw the telltale crawling effect along the reflected light of the background window frame when watching the LG, but the same area looked softer and showed no crawl on Vizio.

In other places however we did see jagged edges on the passive Vizio that were not visible on the active 3D models, for example on the inward-facing windows of the publisher's office (14:49). Horizontal line structure was also evident in many places, particularly text and icons but also on flat fields of bright colors. Finally the Vizio's 3D image did look a bit softer overall than the LG and the active sets, but the difference wasn't that evident in most scenes.

As usual for passive the Vizio's image was brighter and showed less crosstalk--those annoying double images--than any of the active TVs in our lineup, including the Panasonic plasma.

As with 2D, the Vizio's biggest weakness in 3D was black level. Its lighter blacks washed out dark areas of the image and reduced contrast to a much greater extent than any of the other sets in our comparison. Some tweaking of picture settings might help (we don't currently calibrate for 3D in our tests) but there's no way the TV could get as dark as even the LG, let alone the active models.

Between the two kinds of glasses Vizio includes, the flat version fit much better over our regular glasses; the slicker, curved specs didn't fit well at all unless we took off our prescription glasses (maybe Vizio needs to include Croakies). The flat lenses should also reject glare and lead to a better overall 3D experience.

All told 3D on the Vizio was satisfying enough, especially for casual viewing in brighter rooms where its black level issues won't be nearly as apparent.

Power consumption: The Vizio is no power hog but it can't match the efficiency of Samsung's larger D630 model, for example.

Test Result Score
Black luminance (0%) 0.0372 Poor
Avg. gamma 2.3031 Average
Near-black x/y (5%) 0.2858/0.2945 Poor
Dark gray x/y (20%) 0.3128/0.3293 Good
Bright gray x/y (70%) 0.313/0.3305 Good
Before avg. color temp. 5918 Poor
After avg. color temp. 6429 Good
Red lum. error (de94_L) 1.2231 Good
Green lum. error (de94_L) 2.14 Average
Blue lum. error (de94_L) 1.2 Good
Cyan hue x/y 0.2174/0.3302 Good
Magenta hue x/y 0.3276/0.1594 Average
Yellow hue x/y 0.4207/0.5064 Good
1080p/24 Cadence (IAL) Fail Poor
1080i De-interlacing (film) Pass Good
Motion resolution (max) 300 Poor
Motion resolution (dejudder off) 600 Average
PC input resolution (VGA) 1920x1080 Good

Juice box
Vizio E3D420VX Picture settings
Default Calibrated Power save
Picture on (watts) 112.21 82.589 N/A
Picture on (watts/sq. inch) 0.15 0.11 N/A
Standby (watts) 0.25 0.25 N/A
Cost per year $24.80 $18.30 N/A
Score (considering size) Good
Score (overall) Good

Annual energy consumption cost after calibration

Vizio E3D420VX CNET review calibration results

(Read more about how we test TVs.)

Vizio E3D420VX
6.8

Vizio E3D0VX

Score Breakdown

Design 6Features 8Performance 5Value 8
Shopping laptop image
Get the best price on everything
Shop your favorite products and we’ll find the best deal with a single click. Designed to make shopping easier.
Add CNET Shopping