X

Nikon Coolpix S600 review: Nikon Coolpix S600

Nikon Coolpix S600

LoriGruninNewHeadshot.jpg
Lori Grunin
LoriGruninNewHeadshot.jpg

Lori Grunin

Senior Editor / Reviews

I've been writing about and reviewing consumer technology since before the turn of the century. I'm also a photographer and cat herder, frequently at the same time.

See full bio
5 min read

I admit to having mixed feelings about the Nikon Coolpix S600. On one hand, it's a very attractive-looking ultracompact capable of producing pretty 10-megapixel photos. But on the other, it's a tad slow and underfeatured with an occasionally annoying interface. Nor is it priced aggressively enough ($150 or less) to make some of these trade-offs more palatable.

6.6

Nikon Coolpix S600

The Good

Compact and attractive; very nice outdoor photos; optical image stabilization; relatively wide-angle lens.

The Bad

Annoying interface conventions; slow shot-to-shot performance.

The Bottom Line

A good, though not outstanding, compact camera, the Nikon Coolpix S600 is hindered by some shortcomings in its performance and operation.

True, it's a prettily designed camera. At 5.3 ounces with ultracompact dimensions of 2.1 inches by 3.5 inches by 0.9 inch and encased in an elegant slate-black brushed metal, it fits comfortably in a blazer or pants pocket as well as any social occasion.


I really like the S600's scroll wheel; it's got good tactile feedback and is easy to control, and you can press the central OK button without accidentally navigating elsewhere. However, the other four buttons--mode, menu, review, and delete--are difficult to feel and their labels almost impossible to read. Furthermore, the flash status light gets blocked by your thumb when shooting, the ridge on the USB/AV connector cover is kind of sharp, and the label for exposure compensation (implicit right nav button) lies on the side of the camera on the bump.

Despite its attractiveness and flawed-but-usable controls, the S600's operational flow just annoys the heck out of me. It fails to observe all the generally accepted conventions that help speed shooting with heavily menu-based point-and-shoots. For instance, every menu selection requires a confirmation, rather than assuming that the option you were on when you backed out is your choice. So while on a typical competing snapshot camera it takes two button presses to switch from ISO 100 to ISO 200, with the S600 it takes five. Some competing cameras still require this, so only a partial demerit here. However, to get out of the menu, virtual mode dial, and playback, you've got to press the relevant button again; in contrast, almost every other camera quits those modes when you half-press the shutter button. In total, this just makes for a less pleasurable, occasionally frustrating user experience.

Only the macro, flash, self-timer, and exposure compensation settings have dedicated controls--as with most point and shoots, almost all shooting controls are screen- or menu-based. With a virtual mode dial, you cycle among setup, movie, audio recording, program exposure (scenes), a high-ISO auto (extends autoselection range past ISO 800), and regular autoshooting modes. A menu button pulls up your shooting options: resolution/image quality; white balance; metering (matrix and center weighted); shooting (single, continuous, Best Shot Selector); ISO sensitivity (100 to 3,200), various color options, AF area (center, manual, auto, face priority), and AF mode (single, continuous).

I suppose it doesn't matter that it takes multiple presses to access these options, since most of them are of little use. You really don't want to shoot at higher than ISO 400 with this camera, so forget the high ISO mode. I couldn't get the camera to produce different exposures with the matrix and center-weighted metering; the missing spot-meter option usually makes a handier alternative to either one of those. The BSS can be quite useful--it shoots up to 10 photos as you hold the shutter down, then saves the sharpest of the bunch--but it's also the sort of mode that you want to be able to toggle on and off more quickly than the camera allows. And the face-priority AF is too slow, as well as too erratic, to take seriously. As with most snapshot models, the auto area AF invariably picks the wrong subject; for example, in a photo of two people sitting on a bench, the camera chose to focus on the bench. As usual, I recommend that you eschew all the fancy AF modes and instead use center AF, focus, and recompose. For selecting the appropriate subject, you're still faster than the camera.

The S600 has a nice, wide, optically stabilized f/2.7-5.8 28mm-to-112mm 4x zoom lens, but while shooting you may get frustrated by the lack of the telephoto reach you get with models like Panasonic's Lumix TZ series or, to a lesser extent, some of Sony's W series models.

Although it's one of the faster Coolpix S series cameras we've tested lately, the S600 nevertheless has some sluggish aspects to its performance. It starts up in a flash--only 0.8 second. Individual frames focus and shoot pretty quickly, as well: 0.4 second where there's good contrast and 1.1 seconds when there isn't. However, shooting two frames in a row takes a sluggish 2.1 seconds, about the same as the similarly pokey Canon PowerShot SD1100 IS but far slower than most other competitors. On occasion, an hourglass actually appeared on the screen. Flash shooting doesn't add much time to that, it only jumps to about 2.5 seconds, and actually comes out a bit faster than most of its class. The middling-for-its-market burst rate of 1.3 frames per second, disappointingly short battery life--its CIPA-rated at 160 shots per charge, compared with well over 200 for a typical snapshot camera--plus the slow typical shot-to-shot time drags down the S600's performance rating. On the upside, the camera has a nice 2.7-inch LCD that boasts a relatively wide viewing angle and is easy to see even in direct sunlight.

Photo samples from the Nikon Coolpix S600

That said, the S600 produces photos that are generally better than a lot of competitors. It does particularly well in outdoor shots, where it renders saturated, pleasing, and accurate colors. Highlights do tend to blow out, though. For low-detail subject matter in sunlight, you can probably go as high as ISO 800 with little image degradation; in low light, I'd keep that to ISO 400 or lower. However, indoor shots tend to look somewhat overprocessed. There's some distortion, but not more than we expect from a wide-angle lens. Unfortunately, the S600's photos are almost universally just a smidge too soft, and there's no way to control sharpness. And though the camera provides a decent low bit-rate movie mode--30 frames per second VGA at 1.3MB/sec--you can't zoom while recording, which greatly limits its usefulness, and I noticed odd exposure fluctuations during at least one of my clips. (For more details and photo samples, click through the slide show.)

So while the Nikon Coolpix S600 is pretty to look at, fun to hold, and will frequently produce nice photos, disappointing aspects of its performance and operation keep it from getting higher marks. Check out our list of best compact cameras and best ultracompact cameras for some alternatives.

Shooting speed (in frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
Time to first shot  
Flash shot-to-shot time  
Typical shot-to-shot time  
Shutter lag (dim light)  
Shutter lag (typical)  
Canon PowerShot SD1100 IS
1 
3.5 
2.1 
0.7 
0.4 
Kodak EasyShare V1253
2 
1.6 
1.2 
0.8 
0.4 
Nikon Coolpix S600
0.8 
2.5 
2.2 
1.1 
0.4 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T70
1.5 
3 
1.3 
1.2 
0.4 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W130
1.8 
2.8 
1.4 
1 
0.4 
Olympus Stylus 1030SW
1 
4.1 
2 
0.6 
0.5 

Typical continuous-shooting speed (in frames per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

6.6

Nikon Coolpix S600

Score Breakdown

Design 7Features 6Performance 6Image quality 7
laptop
Get the best price on everything
Shop your favorite products and we’ll find the best deal with a single click. Designed to make shopping easier.
Add CNET Shopping