Galaxy Z Flip 4 Preorder Quest 2: Still the Best Student Internet Discounts Best 55-Inch TV Galaxy Z Fold 4 Preorder Nintendo Switch OLED Review Foldable iPhone? 41% Off 43-Inch Amazon Fire TV
Want CNET to notify you of price drops and the latest stories?
No, thank you
Accept

'Elvis' Review: Definitely a Rhinestone, Just Not Quite a Diamond

Austin Butler's performance is the clear standout in Baz Luhrmann's biopic.

Austin Butler as Elvis Presley, in a pink suit holding a guitar.
Austin Butler's Elvis Presley is better than any impersonator I've seen.
Warner Bros.

If you're heading into new movie Elvis seeking an extravaganza of the King's music with the overindulgence of a Baz Luhrmann epic, you'll probably get everything you wanted. Just go into it with the knowledge that Elvis Presley's whirlwind life was an overwhelming blur and, for better or worse, so is the film.

Elvis is a kaleidoscopic fever dream of Presley's early years, rise to fame, infamy and eventual demise. Through the eyes of his manipulative manager Colonel Tom Parker (played by Tom Hanks), we watch the King of Rock 'n' Roll's soaring highs, hard-hitting lows and undeniably iconic moments in a feast for the senses. 

There's no denying that Elvis is a compelling watch, with all the glitz and glamor you'd expect for a Presley biopic, but it skews more towards an ode to Luhrmann's cinematic style than an ode to the King. 

Luhrmann's particular flavor of visual excess and filmmaking extravagance -- familiar from 2013's The Great Gatsby and 2001's Moulin Rouge -- overpower some of the poignant and painful moments of Elvis' life. But if you can get past the dizziness and distraction of Luhrmann's more outlandish choices, there really is a lot to love about the film. 

White-hot star-in-the-making Austin Butler gives a tour de force performance as Elvis, his own vocals blending with the King's to create a multilayered transition from the 1950s to Elvis' final years. Given how many Elvis impersonators there are in the world, Butler's ability to take on the role without falling into stereotype is admirable -- as is his commitment to nailing Presley's iconic moves and The Voice. 

There's been talk that it has actually affected the actor's day-to-day speech because of his choice to go method for the entire two years of filming, but let's be honest: If that's the worst thing his method acting brings out in him, so be it. 

The supporting cast provided mixed results, with Australian Olivia DeJonge outstanding as a disappointingly underutilized Priscilla Presley. Luhrmann regulars David Wenham and Richard Roxburgh are solid as always, but the surprise for me was Tom Hanks' less than consistent portrayal of Colonel Tom Parker. 

While the prosthetics do most of the heavy lifting, an inconsistent accent and caricature presence make it hard to suspend disbelief that we're looking at anyone other than Tom Hanks in a fake nose. As a longtime Hanks fan, it's hard for me to admit he's easily the weakest link in the ensemble.

Ultimately though, my biggest criticism is that the bloated run time made the pacing messy, with the last 40 minutes feeling twice as long as the first. At times it does feel like an excuse to showcase all the iconic Elvis costumes and songs, which is understandable -- it's largely why audiences will show up -- but there's so much of Elvis' story missed out in favor of a more prismatic collage.

But if you can't help falling in love with everything Elvis, rest assured there's no shortage of memorable moments, outfits, smolders and songs. Word is that Priscilla herself even congratulated Luhrmann and Butler and said the film brought her to tears, which you can't deny is a hell of an endorsement.