Ingram jockeys for position

Third-quarter revenue of nearly $6 billion reflect massive consolidation in the middle tier of the high-tech buying chain.

Michael Kanellos Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Michael Kanellos is editor at large at CNET News.com, where he covers hardware, research and development, start-ups and the tech industry overseas.
Michael Kanellos
2 min read
Computer distributor Ingram Micro yesterday reported a 35-percent boost in income and revenue of close to $6 billion for the third quarter, a sales surge that reflects a massive consolidation in the middle tier of the high-tech buying chain.

The company earned $59.8 million, or 40 cents a share, a substantial increase over the $45.8 million earned in the same quarter the year before. Revenue, meanwhile, came to $5.7 billion, an increase of 40 percent over the $4.09 billion for the year-ago third quarter.

Ingram's performance is all the more impressive for the changes which have beset its business.

In recent years, direct computer vendors like Dell have been putting the squeeze on computer distributors and dealers, which have historically earned their living from managing the logistics of delivering hardware and software to customers.

Meanwhile, the pace of mergers and acquisitions has accelerated, creating mammoth distribution consortiums which concentrate more market share in a fewer companies. Earlier this month, for instance, Inacom became a $7 billion distributor-integrator after it purchased Vanstar.

Much of the growth is coming from consolidation rather than expanding markets, said Charles Smulders, an analyst with Dataquest. PC sales figures seem to bear out his point. The worldwide PC industry overall grew around 14 percent for the third quarter, lower than Ingram's 40-percent growth. Top traditional PC vendors, such as IBM, grew at around the same rate. Direct sellers, however, saw sales increase more than 50 percent.

"Overall, we haven't seen a significant upturn," he said. "We are seeing consolidation in the U.S. market and the European market. There is some going on in Latin America as well."

Despite the company's economic girth, Ingram still faces a difficult marketplace, Smulders added. Distributors are working on margins of around two percent, which is much smaller than even strapped hardware vendors face.

In the future, these companies, as well as the computer vendors, will finally have to come up with a solution to meet the direct sales challenge. For a number of years, IBM and others have touted "channel assembly" as a way to blunt Dell's advances. Under this solution, computer vendors ship bare-bones systems and components to distributors and resellers, which then assemble PCs upon customer orders.

Unfortunately, its promise is fading, even though channel assembly programs are barely under way. "I'm skeptical that channel assembly makes sense," said Smulders. "It is potentially more efficient than traditional manufacturing but it is not as efficient as the direct model."

Ian Morton, an analyst with Hambrecht & Quist, agreed that the industry is experiencing a wave of consolidation, but said that Ingram is feeling less overall effects of the direct phenomenon because of the variety of products the company handles. PCs are only 20 percent of the product mix.