Sonos Era 100 ReviewHow to Download iOS 16.4Save 55% on iPhone CasesHow to Sign Up for Google's BardApple's AR/VR HeadsetVR for TherapyClean These 9 Household Items NowCultivate Your Happiness

Apple v. Samsung: The infringing device scorecard

In the end, a jury found that a broad selection of Samsung devices infringed on Apple's patents. Here's the full list.

Kent German

Aug. 24, 2012 7:00 p.m. PT

Kent German Former senior managing editor / features

Kent was a senior managing editor at CNET News. A veteran of CNET since 2003, he reviewed the first iPhone and worked in both the London and San Francisco offices. When not working, he's planning his next vacation, walking his dog or watching planes land at the airport (yes, really).

See full bio

2 min read

Samsung Galaxy Prevail (Boost Mobile) — Samsung's Galaxy prevail could cost it $57 million in damages. Josh Miller/CNET

It was a big win for Apple today when a jury in San Jose, Calif., awarded the company $1 billion in damages in its patent lawsuit against Samsung Electronics. The jury also decided that 26 Samsung Android smartphones and tablets violated several of Apple's design and utility patents.

What follows is a list of the contested patents and the devices that were found to infringe.

'381 patent
Besides the "rubber band" effect where a page "bounces" when a user scrolls to the bottom, '381 also includes touch-screen actions like dragging documents and multi-touch capabilities like pinch to zoom and twist to rotate.

Captivate

Continuum

Droid Charge

Epic 4G

Exhibit 4G

Fascinate

Galaxy Ace

Galaxy Indulge

Galaxy Prevail

Galaxy S

Galaxy S 4G

Galaxy S II (AT&T)

Galaxy S II (unlocked)

Galaxy Tab

Galaxy Tab 10.1

Gem

Infuse 4G

Mesmerize

Nexus S 4G

Replenish

Vibrant

Samsung's infringing devices (pictures)

+23 more

See all photos

'915 patent
Also a touch-screen patent, '915 relates to a device capable of distinguishing between a single-touch scroll operation and a multi-touch pinch-to-zoom operation.

Galaxy S II (T-Mobile)

Transform

'163 patent
You know how you can double-tap a touch screen to enlarge and center portions of Web page, photo, or document? That's what this patent covers. The jury found that the Intercept did not violate patents '915 or '163.

D '677 patent
Switching to hardware, D '677 relates to the front face of an electronic device, as embodied by the iPhone.

Epic 4G Touch

Galaxy S II Skyrocket

D '087 patent
Similar to D '677, the D '087 patent concerns the general outline or "ornamental" design of a phone.

D '305 patent
Jumping to the user interface, the D '305 patent centers on a grid of rounded square icons against a black background.

For the final patent, D '889, which relates to the industrial design of a tablet computer, the jury found that neither Wi-Fi nor the 4G LTE versions of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 infringed.

This post was corrected at 12:48 p.m. PT on August 27: Under patent '677, it was the Epic 4G Touch that was found to infringe, not the Epic 4G.

Apple v. Samsung: The infringing device scorecard

Samsung's infringing devices (pictures)

Apple v. Samsung: The verdict

Get the CNET Daily News newsletter