X

Red Hat ponders new JBoss strategy

Company considers splitting JBoss into free and subscription versions, as with Red Hat's Linux strategy.

Stephen Shankland Former Principal Writer
Stephen Shankland worked at CNET from 1998 to 2024 and wrote about processors, digital photography, AI, quantum computing, computer science, materials science, supercomputers, drones, browsers, 3D printing, USB, and new computing technology in general. He has a soft spot in his heart for standards groups and I/O interfaces. His first big scoop was about radioactive cat poop.
Expertise Processors | Semiconductors | Web browsers | Quantum computing | Supercomputers | AI | 3D printing | Drones | Computer science | Physics | Programming | Materials science | USB | UWB | Android | Digital photography | Science Credentials
  • Shankland covered the tech industry for more than 25 years and was a science writer for five years before that. He has deep expertise in microprocessors, digital photography, computer hardware and software, internet standards, web technology, and more.
Stephen Shankland
2 min read
In an effort to increase revenue from its JBoss server software, Red Hat is contemplating splitting the product into two versions--a free, unsupported product and a subscription-based supported one.

Currently, there is a single version of JBoss, and Red Hat has sold support for it since acquiring the company behind it in April. But Chief Financial Officer Charlie Peters, speaking at a UBS financial conference Tuesday, said that the company is considering applying the two-version formula it used to profit from Linux.

Red Hat, faced with expanded competition from Oracle and Novell, is under pressure to make money off JBoss. Nearly 11 million copies of the server software have been downloaded for free, but today JBoss has "a very small paid customer base," Peters said.

"Our opportunity here is to use the knowledge of what we've done on the Linux side to create the same kind of environment on the middleware side, and to convince customers of the value of moving from free to paid," Peters said.

Open-source software, including many versions of the Linux operating system or the JBoss "middleware" for running Java programs on a server, generally can be downloaded at no cost. For that reason, open-source software has posed challenges to businesses. Red Hat's strategy for Linux profits has been to offer a free, fast-changing version called Fedora and a supported, more stable version called Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

While RHEL's underlying source code is freely available, only those who pay Red Hat annual subscription fees get access to the "binary" software that run on a computer. The subscribers' version also is the one that comes with multiyear and Red Hat certifications to work with specific hardware and software.

With JBoss, Peters said, "One thing we're trying to address is the development model, to come up with something similar to the RHEL-Fedora model...At the moment, we're still working on that model for JBoss. We are confident we can move more of the free JBoss users over to paid subscribers."

Red Hat's Linux split didn't sit well with some, however. Notably, Canonical Chief Executive Mark Shuttleworth launched a company around a new Linux version, Ubuntu, in which the supported version is identical to the free version.