Microsoft exec calls open source a threat to innovation

A high-level Microsoft executive says that freely distributed software code could stifle innovation and that legislators need to understand the threat.

Feb. 7, 2002 12:38 p.m. PT

2 min read

Red Hat's retort: Open source enables innovation
Michael Tiemann, CTO, Red Hat

One of Microsoft's high-level executives says that freely distributed software code such as Linux could stifle innovation and that legislators need to understand the threat.

The result will be the demise of both intellectual property rights and the incentive to spend on research and development, Microsoft Windows operating-system chief Jim Allchin said this week.

Microsoft has told U.S. lawmakers of its concern while discussing protection of intellectual property rights.

Linux is developed in a so-called open-source environment in which the software code generally isn't owned by any one company. That, as well as programs such as music-sharing software from Napster, means the world's largest software maker has to do a better job of talking to policymakers, Allchin said.

''Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer,'' Allchin said. ''I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business.''

Microsoft distributes some of its programs without charge to customers, although it generally doesn't release its programming code and it retains the ownership rights to that code. Linux is the most widely known open-source product, though other programs including the popular Apache system for Web servers also are developed the same way.

Brian Behlendorf, founder of open-source company CollabNet, said most companies that use the open-source development model do retain the rights to some of their intellectual property.

''I think Microsoft is trying to paint the open-source community as being fascist; that all software has to be free, or none of it can be,'' said Behlendorf, whose company helps businesses run their own open-source projects.

Allchin said he's concerned that the open-source business model could stifle initiative in the computer industry.

''I'm an American, I believe in the American Way,'' he said. ''I worry if the government encourages open source, and I don't think we've done enough education of policymakers to understand the threat.''

Some leading computer companies including IBM and Hewlett-Packard are selling Linux-based products and working on open-source projects, noted Jeremy Allison, a VA Linux Systems software developer.

Linux is the fastest-growing operating system program for running server computers, according to market researcher IDC. Linux accounted for 27 percent of unit shipments of server operating systems in 2000. Microsoft's Windows was the most popular on that basis, with 41 percent.

Despite Linux's success in some markets, Allchin said he isn't concerned about sales competition from the product. Microsoft provides support to change and develop products based on its operating system software that Linux companies don't, he said. Companies that use Linux in their products then must pay someone else for support, he said.

"We can build a better product than Linux," he said. "There is always something enamoring about thinking you can get something for free."