The report doesn't consider expenses related to design or marketing, or the fact that high-end chips can sell for more because fewer off the production line can actually run at top speed, but it does shed light on how Intel has managed to maintain healthy margins in an era of price declines. The cost has been steady at about $40 since 2003, according to In-Stat.
Shrinking chip sizes a laplays a big part. Reducing the size of the chips means more processors can be popped out of a single wafer, thereby increasing the potential revenue without incurring massive additional costs. Intel has also continued to build new factories at a rapid pace, In-Stat noted. The chipmaker has three 90-nanometer fabrication facilities and will have four 65-nanometer facilities by the end of 2006. (The nanometer figures refer to the average feature size on the chips; a nanometer is a billionth of a meter.)
"Intel is one of the few vendors that can continue to push ahead alone and uses its technology and capacity as a competitive strength," Jim McGregor, In-Stat analyst, said in a statement.
Still, major technical challenges loom for everyone in shrinking chips from here on out. Though 65-nanometer chips are slated to come out later this year, companies will have to adopt a number of new technologies, such as, in the 45-nanometer generation of chips, due out in 2007.