Argentina's congress is actively considering a billthat would require all government offices to use open-source software. It's partly a cost-saving move, and partly a way to bring the Argentine government into compliance with its software licensing:
The measure is sponsored by representative Marcelo Dragán as part of a national campaign against rampant software piracy in the South American country....
[T]he government itself is one of the worst copyright violators. The [Software Legal trade] association has pending lawsuits against several bureaucratic agencies, including the Secretariat of Tourism, the Federal Radio Committee and the Social Security Administration.
"It's a cultural issue, not a money issue," [Software Legal's president] insisted. "People just don't understand the value of software."
Rather than fight against the culture, the bill embraces it and opts for open-source software, which has its vendors charging for ancillary services and giving the software away. This makes sense. Yes, the government could invest millions in training its citizens to respect US copyright law. Or it could allow Microsoft to do the training for it.
It is taking a viable third way: Align software fees with true software value. Open source does a better job than any other software delivery mechanism in charging for value actually rendered.
I'll be in Argentina in August and would love to meet with anyone involved in open source there. Please email me at my address listed here.