Pentax K-50 and K-500 review: Lots of photo features but pics disappoint

Essentially a tweaked version of its predecessor, the K-30, that can be two-toned to your heart's delight, the Pentax K-50 doesn't seem like much of an update apart from the colors and a nonspecific update to the autofocus system. That said, it still stands out from the competition with the same weather-sealed body, the aforementioned colorific cornucopia, and Pentax's usual broad set of shooting features. However, the image quality is a bit disappointing -- especially when using the default settings -- and the performance, while fast enough for most tasks the family photographer might require it for, is slower than you get from the competition.

7.4

Pentax K-50 and K-500

$250 at Amazon

The Good

The <b>Pentax K-50</b> features a weather-sealed body that's unique in its price class, an interesting set of shooting features, support for AA-size batteries, and a relatively nice viewfinder. Plus, it comes in colors, if that appeals to you. The cheaper <b>K-500</b> has the same feature set but lacks the weather sealing and color combos.

The Bad

Image quality and performance, while acceptable, don't match the competition's, and the cameras lack an articulated LCD. Also, both the shutter and the lens make a lot of noise.

The Bottom Line

A reasonable option for an entry-level dSLR, the Pentax K-50 should satisfy if you need the weather-sealed design. But while acceptable, it and its cheaper sibling the K-500 lag behind the competition in image quality and performance.

The K-50 has a cheaper brother, the K-500, which lacks the weather sealing and only comes in serious black. For review purposes, it's more or less identical.

Image quality
Overall, the image and video quality disappoint, especially on the default color settings. Following a long Pentax consumer tradition, Custom Image still defaults to Bright, a setting that indiscriminately pumps up color saturation and increases contrast, resulting in serious hue shifts and clipped shadow detail. Switching to the Natural setting or shooting raw helps somewhat. If you're not worried about color accuracy, the occasionally surreal colors might appeal. On the other hand, the interface for the Custom Image setting is really nice -- it shows you exactly how the presets and changes affect the color gamut.

Pentax K-50 sample photos

+8 More

See all photos

For JPEGs I wouldn't recommend going higher than ISO 800. The K-50's images generally look pretty soft, and that gets worse as the noise reduction really kicks in. It also looks like the camera adds some sharpening at ISO 400, as there's a noticeable jump in sharpness at that point.

It renders a respectable tonal range, with a reasonable amount of recoverable shadow detail, though like the rest of its class it doesn't retain a lot of highlight detail. Exposures look correct, with no metering surprises, even in this sunny, high-contrast July.

Click to download

ISO 100

ISO 800

ISO 3200

Video also ranks as subpar, with lots of moire and aliasing, as well as severe rolling shutter. The 18-55mm kit lens is also pretty noisy.

Performance
I think the K-50's performance should be fine for most kids-and-pets photography -- it's especially fast for continuous shooting -- but it's just OK compared with other models in its price range. It takes about 1.2 seconds to power on, focus, and shoot. Time to focus, expose, and shoot runs about 0.4 second in good light, but close to 1 second on average in dim conditions. The latter seems to be the result of variability in the response of the autofocus system, at least with the kit lens: at best, the camera locks and drives the lens directly to position in about 0.8 second. But just as often it hunts a couple of times before fixing, increasing the time to as much as 1.4 seconds.

It takes 0.3 second for two sequential JPEG or raw shots, essentially the result of taking focus out of the equation. Adding flash ups that to about 1.1 seconds.

Shooting speed (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)

Time to first shot

Raw shot-to-shot time

Typical shot-to-shot time

Shutter lag (dim light)

Shutter lag (typical)

Canon EOS Rebel T5i

0.7 

0.3 

0.3 

0.8 

0.2 

Nikon D3200

0.3 

0.6 

0.5 

0.5 

0.3 

Pentax K-50

1.2 

0.3 

0.3 

1 

0.4 

Nikon D5200

0.3 

0.2 

0.2 

0.8 

0.5 

The camera can sustain a burst of 5.7-frames-per-second JPEG shots essentially indefinitely (at least 31 shots using a 95MBps card), which should be fast enough for all but fast-action sports. It can burst for eight raw shots at 6.4fps, but then drops significantly.

In practice, the single-shot autofocus feels relatively fast, though the continuous autofocus frequently doesn't lock on the correct subject and there's no way to track it in the optical viewfinder. The K-50 has a fairly large viewfinder with nice representation of the autofocus areas -- much better than the Canon Rebel series'.

Though the camera has a -- disappointingly -- fixed LCD, the screen is pretty bright and high-contrast and visible in direct sunlight.

Design and features
If you discount the different colors the camera comes in, the K-50's design is pretty old-school -- in a good way. Weather sealing aside, even the plastic feels a little sturdier than Canon's or Nikon's bodies. It has both forefinger and thumb dials like higher-end models, and a mode dial that bristles with manual and semimanual modes and only a couple of automatic options, plus two user settings slots. The deep grip, comfortable for single-handed shooting, accommodates either a proprietary lithium ion battery or four AA-size cells. Movie recording is really old-fashioned, with a mode on the dial and stopping and starting with the shutter button. It's additionally inconvenient that if you change shutter or aperture settings while in movie mode it changes them for the relevant priority modes as well; in other words, if you like to shoot movies at 1/30 second and stills at 1/100 second, you'll have to reset them every time you jump back and forth.

All frequently accessed settings have a direct-access control except for metering -- grumble, grumble -- plus there's a control screen that could be redesigned with better visual cues and organized for faster access to the more frequently needed options.

This is not a camera that you can sneak up on people or animals with. The shutter delivers a loud, decisive thwack! and the kit lens sounds like airplane landing gear as it hunts for focus. (Then again, it's pretty hard to be stealthy with a hot-pink and lime-green camera.)

One of the K-50/K-500's strengths is the large selection of uncommon or unique shooting capabilities. It may lack real-time filter effects, but it offers useful features like TAv mode, which allows you to set shutter speed and aperture while the camera automatically selects an ISO sensitivity to match; sensitivity-priority mode, which lets you select the ISO sensitivity and it selects shutter speed and aperture; focus peaking, which appears in autofocus mode as well as with manual focus; and a raw override button. The Interval Shooting is a little more common, but still good to have. And if you have the optional GPS unit, there's also an Astrotracer option, which removes star trails from long exposures in astrophotography.

For a complete account of the features and operation, download the PDF manual for the K-50 or K-500.

Conclusion
Oh, the mixed feelings I have. With a broad but no-nonsense feature set and weather-sealed body, the K-50 stands out from the crowd for its design and features, and while it doesn't have best-in-class performance it's good enough. But it just can't keep up on photo quality, and I really suggest you pass it up if you'll be shooting video. Despite the lack of weather sealing, the K-500 also looks a little better than its frills-free competitors, but once again, compromises on photo quality.