X
CNET logo Why You Can Trust CNET

Our expert, award-winning staff selects the products we cover and rigorously researches and tests our top picks. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Reviews ethics statement

Nikon D600 photo samples

This camera delivers extremely good photo quality at night as well as in the daylight.

Lori Grunin
I've been reviewing hardware and software, devising testing methodology and handed out buying advice for what seems like forever; I'm currently absorbed by computers and gaming hardware, but previously spent many years concentrating on cameras. I've also volunteered with a cat rescue for over 15 years doing adoptions, designing marketing materials, managing volunteers and, of course, photographing cats.
Lori Grunin
35446300_SIC1_620.jpg
1 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Noise

The D600 delivers very clean JPEGs up through ISO 400. You can start to see a little degradation in shadow areas at ISO 800, though there's no corresponding degradation in well-lit areas until about ISO 3200. Images are generally quite usable through ISO 1600.
35446300_SIC1a_620.jpg
2 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Noise, high-ISO JPEGs

There's obvious noise at ISO 6400 and above, with significant detail degradation even in bright areas in the expanded ISO sensitivity range.
35446300_SIC6_620-200.jpg
3 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 200 JPEG

The D600 produces lovely, natural sharpness and tonal range.

(1/100 sec, f6.3, +2/3 stop, ISO 200, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 66mm)
35446300_SIC16_620-200recovery.jpg
4 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Detail recovery

While there's a lot more recovery latitude in the shadows than the highlights in the D600's images, there's sufficient latitude in both directions to fix most high-contrast photos (like my ISO 100 test photos, which I accidentally shot at +2/3 stop exposure compensation). One big difference between the D600 and the D800 is the amount of recoverable detail in seriously blown-out highlights; the latter is much better.

(1/25 sec, f7.1, +2/3 stop, ISO 100, matrix meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 68mm)
35446300_SIC18_620.jpg
5 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Highlights

The clipped highlights on the background apples are an example of areas of unrecoverable highlights. This is from the 14-bit raw file shot in the Adobe RGB color space; in the JPEG, those areas are simply flat.
35446300_SIC7_620-400.jpg
6 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 400 JPEG

Images come off the sensor with very little noise at ISO 400. I can't even credit the cleanness of this shot to good noise reduction; the raw version without any NR looks almost as good.

(1/13 sec, f5.6, spot meter, ISO 400, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 62mm)
35446300_SIC8_620-800light.jpg
7 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 800 JPEG, bright light

The camera and sensor have extremely intelligent noise-reduction algorithms. This is the shadow area of a relatively bright shot; there's very little NR going on anywhere else in the scene.

(1/80 sec, f6.3, spot meter, ISO 800, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 78mm)
35446300_SIC9_620-800dark.jpg
8 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 800 JPEG, darkness

There are practically no visible compression artifacts or color noise in the sky, though there's some color noise in the gold areas of the clock. That tends to be difficult to process thanks to the reflection of the stoplight.

(1/80 sec, f4.5, spot meter, ISO 800, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 75mm)
35446300_SIC12_620-800DR.jpg
9 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Dynamic range

ISO 800 is as high as I'd go with assuming recoverable shadow areas -- there's some clipping in the darkest areas at 100 percent -- but it handled the significant exposure fix (raw file) very well.

(1/80 sec, f10, matrix meter, ISO 800, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 55mm)
35446300_SIC10_620-1600.jpg
10 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 1600 JPEG

The JPEGs start to show significant color noise at ISO 1600, but you can get good results from raw.

(1/80 sec, f4.5, spot meter, ISO 1600, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 85mm)
35446300_SIC13_620-1600noNR.jpg
11 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 1600, no noise reduction

This is pretty good for an untouched ISO 1600 image.

(1/80 sec, f3.5, ISO 1600, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 24mm)
35446300_SIC11_620-3200.jpg
12 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 3200 JPEG

While you can see quite a bit of color noise here, it's not noticeable in a 13x19 print or scaled down 75 percent.

(1/80 sec, f4.2, ISO 3200, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 52mm)
35446300_SIC5_620-6400rj.jpg
13 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 6400 raw vs. JPEG

If you don't mind a little grain, the ISO 6400 images clean up real nice.

(1/80 sec, f4.5, ISO 6400, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 78mm)
35446300_SIC14_620-12800v5D.jpg
14 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 12800, D600 vs. 5D Mark II

Interestingly, the D600's JPEGs aren't exceptionally better than those of the 5DM2 at ISO 12800. However, the D600 doesn't have any hot pixels and has less clipping in the shadows of the raws than the 5DM2.

(1/80 sec, f4, ISO 12800, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, Nikon 24-85mm lens at 24mm/Canon 24mm f1.4 lens)
35446300_SIC15_620-12800.jpg
15 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 12800 JPEG

The D600's high-ISO-sensitivity shots look very nice scaled down.

(1/80 sec, f4, ISO 12800, spot meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 24mm)
35446300_SIC4_620-color.jpg
16 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Color

Personally, I find the D600's white balance just a hair too cool in general, but it's still quite within the bounds of acceptability, and the colors are relatively accurate.
35446300_SIC2_620.jpg
17 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Picture Controls

The default Standard Picture Control doesn't seem to push saturation, but it does boost the contrast -- you can see where you lose some shadow detail because of it (the green peppers in the foreground, for example).

(1/60 sec, f4.5, ISO 200, matrix meter, AWB, Nikon 24-85mm lens at 80mm)
35446300_SIC3_620-red.jpg
18 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Bright, saturated colors

While the JPEGs tend to clip bright, saturated areas, the detail is still there are recoverable in raw.

(1/160 sec, f8, ISO 100, +2/3 stop, matrix meter, AWB, standard Picture Control, Nikon 24-85mm lens at 24mm/Canon 24mm f1.4 lens)
35446300_SIC17_620-sharp.jpg
19 of 19 Lori Grunin/CNET

Sharpness, 24-85mm lens

The 24-85mm kit lens delivers a good sharpness match for the sensor.

(1/400 sec, f10, ISO 200, +2/3 stop, spotmeter, AWB, standard Picture Control, 24-85mm lens at 78mm)

More Galleries

My Favorite Shots From the Galaxy S24 Ultra's Camera
A houseplant

My Favorite Shots From the Galaxy S24 Ultra's Camera

20 Photos
Honor's Magic V2 Foldable Is Lighter Than Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra
magic-v2-2024-foldable-1383

Honor's Magic V2 Foldable Is Lighter Than Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra

10 Photos
The Samsung Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus Looks Sweet in Aluminum
Samsung Galaxy S24

The Samsung Galaxy S24 and S24 Plus Looks Sweet in Aluminum

23 Photos
Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra Now Has a Titanium Design
The Galaxy S24 Ultra in multiple colors

Samsung's Galaxy S24 Ultra Now Has a Titanium Design

23 Photos
I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites
img-0368.jpg

I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites

34 Photos
17 Hidden iOS 17 Features You Should Definitely Know About
Invitation for the Apple September iPhone 15 event

17 Hidden iOS 17 Features You Should Definitely Know About

18 Photos
AI or Not AI: Can You Spot the Real Photos?
img-1599-2.jpg

AI or Not AI: Can You Spot the Real Photos?

17 Photos