March 16, 2009 9:10 AM PDT

Sci Fi Channel to become Syfy: Thank the lawyers?

by Dan Ackerman
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 120 comments
Share

In perhaps the most ill-advised branding move since New Coke, NBC's basic-cable Sci Fi Channel will be renamed the phonetically similar Syfy on July 7.

The change reportedly comes from a desire to own a trademark on the network's name. The term sci-fi is a generic description of a fiction genre (often featuring futuristic technology), while Syfy can be a unique brand.

Bonnie Hammer, president of NBC Universal Cable Entertainment, told The New York Times, "We couldn't own Sci Fi; it's a genre...but we can own Syfy."

The derisive hoots have already begun. Entertainment industry columnist Nikki Finke points out, "Adding to the idiocy is that there's already a company called SyFi Global, an information technology (specialist)." Meanwhile, Gawker says the network's new tagline, Imagine Greater, "means nothing and is grammatically incoherent."

New York native Dan Ackerman, a former radio DJ turned journalist, has written about technology and music for publications including Spin, Blender, The Hollywood Reporter, and USA Today. He hosts the weekly Digital City podcast and the New York edition of Editors' Office Hours. Dan's new album, Tales Out of Night School, is available now. E-mail Dan.
Recent posts from Digital City Podcast
Digital City 62: Mario's pizza place and the solid gold PS3
CES flashback 1989: Gaming 20 years ago
Digital City Podcast 61: Peace in the Mac vs PC wars?
A modest proposal: Detente between Mac and PC laptop fans
Digital City Podcast 60: Attack of Cyber Monday!
Digital City Podcast 59: Black Friday shopping tips, and a PS3 MAG beta invite giveaway
Digital City Podcast 58: Apple vs. Psystar; our fave laptop backpack; and New Super Mario Bros. Wii
Nintendo DS gets Modern Warfare: Handcramps
Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 4 pages (120 Comments)
by AlSleet March 16, 2009 9:27 AM PDT
Imagine Greater......perhaps they should imagine grammar.
Reply to this comment
by jtfan2004 March 16, 2009 10:39 AM PDT
OMG. I spit my Coke out. Funniest reply I've seen all day.
by Kev_Orng March 16, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
It's obvious that Apple's Grammarians have been taking some work on the side... Think Different... Funnest iPod... Imagine greater...
by protagonistic March 16, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
Perhaps we could extend that, "Imagine Greater, A life without walls". Do they perhaps have the same ad agency? :-)
by mike_ekim March 16, 2009 1:04 PM PDT
We don't need no frakin' grammar! Sad, the best show on Sci-Fi (one of the best on tv imo) is about to die with it's 'end of the storyline' ending, and then I won't need the Sci-Fi channel anymore. If not for this article, I probably wouldn't have ever known.

Just one more time...Frack!
by Tinman52 March 16, 2009 10:45 PM PDT
I'd probably keep watching if SG and BSG weren't both off or about to go off the air. Certainly questionable timing.

I wonder, does the new branding support the broadcasting of ECW on the network? I don't know that "Imagine Greater" really exemplifies what professional wrestling is all about.
by ludell July 23, 2009 5:19 AM PDT
hahahahaha

yes, i agree.
by DarkHawke March 16, 2009 9:30 AM PDT
Wow. There's always been a love/hate thing going on between SF fans and the SCI FI Network, what with the continuous stream of schlocky movies, seemingly random cancellations of promising shows and the introduction of *wrestling* into their prime-time lineup, but now this? The "snow" must be falling thick and fast at NBC/Uni for this to have EVER sounded like a good idea. Suddenly rebranding TNN as SPIKE seems like a masterstroke by comparison!
Reply to this comment
by MrZook March 16, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
I haven't watched the SciFi channel for about 10 years just for those reasons. I can get better science fiction content on the superfluous shotime/hbo/encore channels.
by DigitalFrog March 16, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
Sigh, Fie! would have been more appropriate...
by blusky08 March 16, 2009 6:20 PM PDT
FINALLY, someone has said it.
Those Sci-Fi movies are the lamest things ever. They just keep producing corny, boring, low budget movies with horrible computer generated monsters. They're all basically the same monster movie but with different faces.

Worst. Movies. Ever. They haven't come out with anything worthwhile in years, and I stopped watching it.
by mcka0471 March 17, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
Not to mention the blatant day long horror reels... hello its supposed to be the scifi channel... we already have the horror channel! ***!
by Harlan879 March 16, 2009 9:43 AM PDT
Hah, what a disaster! It would be as if Coca-Cola were to change it's formulation! Oh, wait...
Reply to this comment
by Lenman_99 March 16, 2009 9:45 AM PDT
They should rename it. It should be something to do with horror. This channel show so little real Sci-Fi it needs a new name. What Sci-Fi they do show is lame series and cheaply made movies that ruin classic Sci-Fi stories (i.e. River World). What a waste of a good genre specific Idea.
Reply to this comment
by Booistan March 16, 2009 10:02 AM PDT
Nerds? There are not enough of you to support a channel! That's why there is this re-branding and why shows fail. Sure, you guys over index the web demographic and like to talk a lot. They are trying to SAVE the channel.
Reply to this comment
by MrZook March 16, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
sort of like the ZDTV -> TechTV -> G4 transition. Thank goodness I can tune in and see Ninja Warrior rather than current technology news.
by Kev_Orng March 16, 2009 10:59 AM PDT
Don't look now, but you just commented on CNet. Nerd.
by stickler9700 March 16, 2009 12:31 PM PDT
Actually, the Sci-Fi Channel is one of the highest rated cable channels. There is nothing to save. This move simply demonstrates the complete lack of critical thinking by the people at HQ who should be extremely grateful for the grace it's viewers have extended it over the last several years.
by blusky08 March 16, 2009 6:26 PM PDT
One of the highest rated channels?
Maybe because there's nothing else on the other channels either, so it gets watched by default.

Seriously, the cable channels need to get new some new programming--QUALITY programming. They simply refuse to pay for good movies/series, and the public has no choice but to lap it up.
by oversight68 March 17, 2009 2:10 AM PDT
Lol, if they want to save the channel, then they should fire all the decision makers including Bonnie Hammer, and bring in new blood that understands and cares about the genre.
by mtbabcock July 13, 2009 4:17 PM PDT
The problem is that the new name irritates all the diehard scifi (not SciFi) fans but does nothing to attract new viewers.
by Lenman_99 March 16, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
Hey Booistan, do non nerds usally waste their time making comments on stories about the Sci-Fi channel on the web?
Reply to this comment
by aas247 March 16, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
lexx farscape babylon 5 even freakin andromeda all those were decent shows its a sad day for sci fi nerds
Reply to this comment
by Tedders85 March 16, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
Yes to all but Lexx. That might be pushing it a little ;)
by myles taylor March 16, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
The "SyFy" channel has certainly lost it's way. I rarely watch it anymore and I am a huge science fiction fan. What does that tell you?

I understand it's a ratings game, but I never understood how you could watch wrestling on a science fiction channel.

The history and discovery channels aren't any better, unfortunately, with lame reality shows taking over their line-up.
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 March 16, 2009 6:31 PM PDT
Yeah, and how about those documentaries on Disovery and History? You know, the ones they keep showing over and over because they're too cheap to produce new ones. On the rare occasion when they make a new one it is so dumbed down it's unwatchable.
by Shaun822 March 17, 2009 8:22 AM PDT
Only show I watch on SciFi (I refuse to use that ridiculous new moniker) anymore is The Twilight Zone. And, all of those episodes were produced and shot in the late 50's.
by Dalkorian March 17, 2009 9:01 AM PDT
by myles taylor March 16, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
The "SyFy" channel has certainly lost it's way. I rarely watch it anymore and I am a huge science fiction fan. What does that tell you?

-------------------------------------------------------------------

That I'm not alone!
:-)
by efrdman2008 March 16, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
Imagine Greater, "means nothing and is grammatically incoherent."........ ok, has anyone noticed that the ipod touch's "funnest ipod ever" doesnt make any sense??? but nooooo, since it is an apple god product it is flawless!!!
Reply to this comment
by Kev_Orng March 16, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
Actually, Funnest iPod Ever was the target of much derision on Apple related sites and forums. Just like Think Different(ly) was.

Here, google these:
"funnest ipod" site:www.tuaw.com
"funnest ipod" site:www.9to5mac.com

The bigger mystery is, how is it that some people can turn any topic, no matter how unrelated, into a sneering sideways jab at Apple?

I can only imagine what holidays must be like for your family "More turkey, efrdman?" "No, it's a little dry... maybe if you'd put an Apple logo on it, I wouldn't notice, because nobody ever notices when Apple makes a dry turkey."
by tappy727 March 16, 2009 2:33 PM PDT
When I see funnest, I always misread it to be the "funniest iPod" and wonder what is so funny about that iPod?
by albertsoler March 16, 2009 10:29 AM PDT
OMG! I can't imagine anything more stupid! Someone please post a picture of the pinhead executive who thought up this gem! I need to laugh a bit longer.

The Sci-Fi channel started out with great potential. But it has deteriorated greatly since. Fans of "Sci-Fi", (the genre), are going to have to look else where for sci-fi content.

Here's a thought -- if they can't trademark "Sci-Fi", then maybe someone else can start a *new* Sci-Fi Channel. How could they sue? Think about it -- which would you tune into: The Sci-Fi Channel or The SyFy Channel?

Someone better trademark the token "wTHr" before the Weather Channel gets any equally stupid ideas.

SyFy : Acronym for "Simply Yawns. So, Eff You."
Reply to this comment
by dwkmi March 16, 2009 10:32 AM PDT
Reminds me of SyFyLess aka Syphilis
Reply to this comment
by Cruton502 March 16, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
Lol, that was my first thought also when I saw the name.
by clamenza March 16, 2009 10:33 AM PDT
With shows like Ghost Hunters that attract far more idiots than I thought exist, they're already not Sci-Fi. Hopefully this came from the same geniuses that merged UPN and WB. Good riddance.
Reply to this comment
by medezark March 17, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
I like Ghost Hunters, and Dr. Reul (Ruel?) from the originaly Sci-Fi channel Saturday Morning line-up. Now, Ghost Hunters International is too much for me though. Scifi does suffer from a dearth of classic sci fi. Why don't they have a Saturday Night Classics, and show movies like "Forbidden Planet", "War of the Worlds", "Day of the Triffids" instead of the Crap Sci-Fi Channel Stupid Movie of the Week?
by Pete Bardo March 16, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
Y'all got it all wrong about SyFy. It's obviously gonna be a hip-hop Grateful Dead channel. Haven't you ever heard of "Steal Your Face, Yo"?
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian March 17, 2009 9:04 AM PDT
Hip-hop Grateful Dead? That sounds about as confusing as "syfy" does.

Maybe you're onto something here ...
;-)
by Jon March 16, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
Sci-fi used to be (past tense) one of our favorite channels. Not any more. The programing has seen a drastic drop into the mundane and the additions junk (like wrestling) that has nothing whatsoever in common with science fiction (albeit, it is fiction) . . . and the changing of great programs or dropping of others . . . leaves me totally unimpressed. I prefer BBC America now for my Sci-fi appetite. I say, let it die a quiet death if they can't go back to the roots of real Sci-fi.
Reply to this comment
by Kev_Orng March 16, 2009 10:53 AM PDT
Seems perfectly reasonable coming from the land of the all-NITE drive-THRU.
Reply to this comment
by ngmt50t March 16, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
Keep it the same. Who really cares if it's something that they can own it.
Reply to this comment
by edtechlab March 16, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
Imagine Greater? Who approved that one? Syfy has progressively gotten worse. Ghost Hunters is a joke. A lot of the movies are third rate. Sorry but giant snakes and other reptile movies suck.
Reply to this comment
by rrod182 March 16, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Snakes on a Mother F&ckin' TV?
by Dalkorian March 17, 2009 9:13 AM PDT
Snakes on a TV - I LOL'd at that one, thanks!

But you're both right, I was one time excited to have the Sci-Fi channel but lately I find myself rarely watching it anymore. You can only take so much B-rated overgrown reptile movies with blonde bimbos running around. Don't get me wrong, those blonde bimbos were the highlights of the junk called a "movie", but you can feel your brains deteriorating while watching. Ghost hunters and wrestling? How is that garbage "sci-fi"? What about Star Trek, Star Wars, The Black Hole, Event Horizon, 2001/2010, iRobot, Babylon 5, Battle Star Galactica, Stargate, Farscape - you know, SCIENCE FICTION?

I miss Sci-Fi.
by albertsoler March 16, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
Sigh. Fie!
Reply to this comment
by xenophod March 16, 2009 10:57 AM PDT
Gag! Way to go NBC, your programming on the channel has already degraded into the trash heap now you want to brand that trash heap. Ghost Hunters, please. ECW.. ***? Scare Tactics? Ultimate Gamer? What do these shows have in common? If you said they don't belong on a SciFi channel you would be right. Stick to actual Sci-Fi programming and you might develop a following. Even old Sci-Fi reruns would pull in more of an audience that is inline with your brand. At one point I actually considered myself a regular viewing of the SciFi channel, about the only thing left is to see how bad the ending to Galactica is.
Reply to this comment
by blusky08 March 16, 2009 6:36 PM PDT
But that would require them to pony up for the rights to show good programming. Why do that when they can make just make another giant reptile movie?
by gsigas March 16, 2009 11:10 AM PDT
I guess it makes sense if the channel is trying to move beyond science fiction. In the end what really matters is their programming, not their name.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian March 17, 2009 9:14 AM PDT
Right - and their programming has sucked donkey for years now.

I miss Sci-Fi.
Showing 1 of 4 pages (120 Comments)
Subscribe to the Digital City podcast

Subscribe to the audio podcast via RSS
Subscribe to the video podcast via RSS

Subscribe to the audio podcast via iTunes
Subscribe to the video podcast via iTunes

advertisement

About Digital City Podcast

Live from New York, CNET's Dan Ackerman, Julie Rivera, Joseph Kaminski, and Scott Stein explore the impact of new technology on city life and urban environments, from municipal Wi-Fi to high-tech crime to tricks for cutting the line at the Apple Store.

Send us e-mail at digitalcity@cnet.com.


Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital City Podcast topics

More on Digital City
Digital City on CNET Live
Dan Ackerman’s Blog Posts
Julie Rivera’s Blog Posts
Joseph Kaminski’s Blog Posts
Scott Stein’s Blog Posts
CNET TV Laptop Videos
Meet the Digital City hosts
Dan Ackerman Former radio DJ turned journalist Dan Ackerman grew up in the Bronx and now lives in Manhattan. He’s covered music, technology, and video games for more than 10 years. His latest album, Tales Out of Night School is available now. See profile
Joseph Kaminski Joseph Kaminski, when not juggling the dual demands of parenthood and HD gaming, is a life-long Manhattanite and can be found testing the latest tech in CNET’s Lab. See profile
Julie Rivera Julie Rivera grew up and currently resides in Brooklyn. When she's not deejaying, bartending, or fixing gadgets for friends on the outside, you'll find her testing, troubleshooting and developing benchmarks for laptops in the "fish bowl" known as CNET Labs. See profile
Scott Stein Scott Stein, CNET's newest laptops editor, was born in Queens and grew up a Long Islander - and is now raising a kid in NYC. In addition to covering games and tech, writing screenplays, and performing improv in seedy downtown establishments, he's also a die-hard, season-ticket-holding Jets fan. See profile
Podroll
When you're not listening to Digital City, here's some other great podcasts to try.
Inside CNET Labs
The 404
Indecent Exposure
Other CNET podcasts