• On MovieTome: CAPTAIN AMERICA was in THE HULK?!?
February 6, 2008 6:05 AM PST

Ten irrelevant technology companies

Posted by Steve Tobak
  • Font size
  • Print

The great corporate graveyard is filled with hundreds, maybe thousands, of technology companies that managed to go public and then fizzled. Still, most of them weren't going anywhere and never should have gone public to begin with.

But venture capitalists funded them, investment banks underwrote them, analysts wrote glowing reports about them, and you and I bought into it, gullible lemmings that we are. Sorry for being such a negatron; that's just the way it is.

Anyway, what's different about these 10 companies is that they were once important, maybe even exciting. And now, for one reason or another, they're fading slowly and tediously into obscurity. Like people, most companies go out, not with a bang, but with a whimper.

Depressing, isn't it?

Why bother looking at this stuff? Well, it's fun--at least for me it is--and it's also instructive; we can always learn from others' mistakes. After all, companies don't go bad, executives who run them and boards that oversee them are always responsible.

While this process is admittedly subjective, it is based on metrics, primarily chronic revenue decline or stagnation, the more red ink the better.

Ten irrelevant technology companies

Vitesse--This 24-year old communications chip company was once valued at $20 billion. Now, thanks to the dot.com bust, stock options backdating and accounting scandals, and general mismanagement, Vitesse is falling apart at the seams and running out of cash.

Silicon Graphics--Once a $3.6 billion computer powerhouse, last year's sales were down to $341 million and dropping precipitously. It's also been bleeding like a stuck pig for nine of the last ten years. One foot in the grave ...

Zilog--Zilog is the poster child for great, famous companies now doomed to obscurity. Revenues have been continuously declining and the company's been losing money for as far back as I can remember. Taking it private, taking it public again, management changes, restructurings, nothing has worked.

Transmeta--Valued at $11 billion in an overhyped IPO, it was all downhill from there for this low-power microprocessor company. Then it cut a licensing deal with Intel last year. Still, last quarter's revenues were 44 thousand--that's right, thousand--dollars.

Conexant--Rockwell didn't just saddle its chip spinoff with a bad name. In its ten years of existence this communications chip company has lost an aggregate $4.7 billion on sales of $8.2 billion. Amazingly, its market cap was once $60 billion!

hi/fn--With a market cap of $2 billion during the tech bubble, this data security company was going places. Well, not exactly. The company hasn't been in the black and annual sales have been stuck in the $40 million range since 2000. Dumb name, too.

Neomagic--This was once a hot young company with annual sales of $250 million, solid profit margins, and a $1.5 billion market cap, and that was before the tech bubble. That was also before demand for its embedded memory technology dried up. Last year's sales were less than a million bucks.

MIPS--Spun off from Silicon Graphics 10 years ago, this licensor of embedded processor technology is a real enigma. According to the company's Web site, its technology is everywhere. Still, there's no consistent profitability or growth. Revenues topped out at just $89 million back in 2000.

Sigmatel--Can you say "flash in the pan"? Sales rocketed from $30 million to over $300 million in three years, then fell off a cliff the following year while swinging to a $109 million loss. Just announced a sale to Freescale for a paltry $110 million.

Cirrus Logic--There was a time when this company's graphics chips and storage controllers were everywhere. That was a long time ago. Annual sales have declined from their peak at $1.1 billion in 1996 to $183 million last year. That said, Cirrus is profitable. Irrelevant, but profitable.

Where do these companies go from here? They'll either get swooped up for bargain-basement prices, like Sigmatel, or die an agonizingly slow death. There's always a slim possibility of a turnaround, but that'll require at least a management and board shakeup. Don't hold your breath.

One more thing: this may raise a few eyebrows, but here are a few companies that I think are well on their way to making the list if they don't watch it: Atmel, National Semiconductor, On Semiconductor, Pixelworks, Silicon Image, Sun Microsystems, and Virage Logic. Mark my words.

Steve Tobak is managing partner of Invisor Consulting LLC. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Train Wreck
Wonder why everything isn't speech controlled?
Survey links CEO approval to stock performance
Making sense of reorgs
Meetings suck, but they don't have to
Far out technology for the geek in all of us
How many strikes before a tech CEO is out?
The alternative-energy bubble
Corporate governance is a myth
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 15 comments
by OccasionalPythonBoot February 6, 2008 7:01 AM PST
While we're at it, let's add IBM to that list. They're a dinosaur--sort of the Sears Roebuck & Co. of technology firms. They were big back in your daddy's day, but yet they still hang in there, marching to their own beat, oblivious to the rest of the technology sector.
Reply to this comment
by MadLyb February 6, 2008 7:19 AM PST
I have to disagree with PythonBoot. Even though I am no fan of IBM, they truly understand their customer's needs (of course, you may not be their customer). They have embraced Open Source, much more than any of the big traditionals, and have garnered a strong presence in the new IT sector. Xbox and PS3 (in concert with Sony) run on IBM processor technology.

That said, I still think the post Gerstner IBM is not as strong.

My pick for dying on the vine would be Novell. They have regained some relevance by shifting to Open Source, but the revenue just isn't the same.
by brrman February 6, 2008 7:27 AM PST
IBM has been moving its focus to technology individuals (as in consulting) and software, and away from their traditional hardware for the past 10 years. Hence the sale to Lenovo, etc. Their 4qtr profit in 2007 rose 12% with strong 2008 guidance.

IBM is doing just fine as a company. They are not a dinosaur, but more like an crocodile - still alive after millions of years and not going anywhere.
by ryanmicj February 6, 2008 7:54 AM PST
IBM is consitently in the top 3 in the world in terms of number of patents granted each year. While they may seem like a dinosaur at times - its hard to understand while they are still selling mainframes, unless you are in that market - they are clearly leading the rest of the technology sector in various ways.
by co_z February 6, 2008 8:41 AM PST
This is a pretty ignorant statement - IBM has led the way in developing profitable open source business models, setting trends for what every other successful OSS company has done since. They are a $100 billion dollar company with a low multiple and stellar growth. They managed to change their entire way of doing business when the market demanded it, which is something the dinosaurs failed to do, if I can believe what wikipedia tells me.

If only american car companies could have been as dynamic, Detroit wouldn't be growing corn right now.
by ElMartino1 February 6, 2008 7:37 AM PST
I wouldn't be so fast to discredit Sun. Jon Schwartz is really giving that company the McNealy enema it's been needing for years.
Reply to this comment
by robd11 February 6, 2008 8:09 AM PST
I suppose one includes Mindspeed in the Conexant train wreck.
A few other noteables are:
Tundra Semi - steadily declining revenues since 2004 despite some aquisitions.
Zarlink Semi - oh boy, talk about losing money.
Mosaid - A nice stream of licensing fees from sueing folks over a few memory patents completely wasted on a bunch of ill conceived semi plays. They should fire everyone except the lawyers and accountants.
Reply to this comment
by stobak February 6, 2008 9:15 AM PST
I considered Zarlink and some others, but decided they were never relevant to begin with.

I go back and forth on Novell, but definitely not what it used to be.

Schwartz has definitely improved Sun's bottom line, but The Street's still not buying it and neither am I. I just don't see a clear strategy for driving top-line growth like in the old days.

Steve Tobak
Reply to this comment
by robd11 February 7, 2008 10:58 AM PST
I think Zarlink (Mitel Semi) was relevant for about 2 seconds back in 2000, when the boom was never going to end and I was heading for retirement at age 35. (I never worked there BTW.) Here I am 7 yrs later still working for the man, surfing the web on company time.
by A_N_Onymous February 6, 2008 9:32 AM PST
#11: CNET
Reply to this comment
by sal-magnone February 6, 2008 12:01 PM PST
You forgot- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_Group
Reply to this comment
by Andronicus February 6, 2008 12:39 PM PST
Well the only company I have heard of is Sigmatel. Not sure that they are irrelevent. They make all the MC for all the cheep MP3 players.
Reply to this comment
by cozappz February 7, 2008 12:26 AM PST
Cirrus Logic produced a chip for Fujitsu-Siemens HDDs which blew off 1 million HDDs. I RMA'd 10 of them, my team RMA'd 1000 HDDs. So, there's no surprise here.
Reply to this comment
by RicABlair February 11, 2008 10:55 PM PST
Motorola, I guess, is already dead.
Reply to this comment
by Alpachino321 February 18, 2008 10:34 PM PST
Good wiki
http://capify.stikipad.com/wiki/show/HomePage
http://capify.stikipad.com/wiki/recent_activity/128
http://www.globalize-rails.org/globalize/recent_activity
http://ajaxscaffold.stikipad.com/doc/recent_activity/
http://ajaxscaffold.stikipad.com/doc/show/HomePage
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


Resource center from CNET News sponsors
Business. Ready.
Sony VAIO® Professional PCs.

Click Here!
A new grade in mobility demands a new kind of notebook. And Sony delivers.Tough, portable and featuring up to 7.5 hours of battery life! VAIO® Professional notebooks are built for business. Learn more.

Click Here!
Built tough for business.

Learn more about the rigorous quality testing Sony puts its notebooks through.

Protect your investment.

Find out why VAIO® tech support recently won a Laptop Editors' Choice Award, July 2008.

Long battery life.

Up to 7.5 hours of battery life! See how VAIO® PCs will keep you productive longer when on the road.

Travel light

Check out our ultraportable line-up, starting at 2.87 lbs.

PCs for every need.

Find out which VAIO® notebook is right for you.

About Train Wreck

Steve Tobak is a marketing consultant and former chip industry executive. Train Wreck provides insight into dysfunctional corporate behavior, among other things. When he's not airing the industry's dirty laundry, Steve likes to hang around the house, make believe he's working, and drive his wife crazy. Find out more at www.invisor.net or email Steve at trainwreck@invisor.net. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Train Wreck topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right