May 8, 2008 10:06 AM PDT

Why the Xbox 360 will win the console war

Lately, there has been a considerable amount of discussion on which console will win this generation's war. Will it be the Wii with its established base and strong sales? Will it be the Xbox 360 with its steady growth? Or will it be the Playstation 3 with its strong sales over the past few months?

Xbox 360

The Xbox 360 will take the day

(Credit: CNET News.com)

If you ask me, it'll be the Xbox 360.

Now I know what you're thinking -- "how?" The answer is actually quite simple: the Wii is not nearly as strong as some want to believe and Sony's strong growth is the result of a lower hardware price, which is allowing it to catch up to the pack.

Of course, Sony's Kaz Hirai doesn't agree with that sentiment. According to the company's gaming chief, Sony will follow a "ten-year cycle" with the PS3 that should propel it to the top spot in the industry once it's all said and done.

And while his desire to do that isn't quite rooted in reality, I guess you can't blame a guy for trying.

According to Hirai, Sony is prepared to battle it out in a "marathon" race against Nintendo and Microsoft and he believes his platform has what it takes to win the day.

"I am very confident that after the 10-year life-cycle we will have the installed base that we are looking for and that is obviously to be in the leadership position," he said in an interview.

Sadly, Hirai totally missed it on this one.

According to the latest sales figures, Sony has sold roughly 13 million Playstation 3 units worldwide, while Nintendo has sold 25 million Wiis and Microsoft has sold 19 million Xbox 360s. And while Sony won't cite those figures, it chooses instead to mention "velocity" -- the rate at which its sales are increasing.

There's no debating the fact that Sony sales are stronger and although the Wii still reigns supreme, it's viability is running low and the chances of it maintaining such a lead in the industry is quite slim. All the while, the Xbox 360 is the forgotten player in this market that's still enjoying hearty sales without any major price drop -- a contributing factor to Sony's gain -- in sight.

With that in mind, you're probably wondering why I think the Xbox 360 will take the day when it's all said and done. Suffice it to say that as it stands, Microsoft has the best strategy in place to appeal to the biggest group of gamers and create a greater value proposition for its customers.

Here's why:

Games, games, games

I don't know how many times I've said it on these hallowed pages, but I need to say it again -- games mean everything to hardware sales once the first year in the new console generation is over. By then, everyone who wanted the new hardware has it and everyone else who doesn't want to spend money on something that doesn't entice them, waits for something big.

In previous generations, this is where Sony performed extremely well. With exclusives from Square-Enix and even Rockstar Games, the company was able to enjoy huge upswings in hardware sales prior to and after, the release of major titles like Final Fantasy and Grand Theft Auto. On the other hand, Microsoft and Nintendo were forced to play catch-up with first-party titles and other semi-major hits.

But today, that game has changed. Nintendo is still clinging to the value of its first-party titles and Sony has lost a slew of exclusives, including GTA IV. And although the company still has Killzone 2, Microsoft had Halo 3. Although Sony has Metal Gear Solid 4, Gran Turismo 5, and Little Big Planet, the Xbox 360 lineup of games overall is much stronger.

Of course, you don't need to take my word for it. Kaz Hirai, in a severe understatement, admitted his company has a problem: "There was also some concern in the media and from customers about the lack of titles available at launch."

The way I see it, those problems are still present.

But let's not forget that Nintendo is not innocent in all this. If it weren't for first-party titles, I'm not convinced that the Wii would be nearly as popular as it is today. And now that almost every major Nintendo title is already available, how much longer should we expect the company to enjoy such strong sales?

The online component

There's no debating the fact that in the video game industry, Microsoft reigns supreme in the online space. Over the past few years, Microsoft has single-handedly create an online experience that not only manhandles Nintendo and Sony's attempt at online entertainment, but has millions wanting more. Beyond that, it's an important selling point when customers need to decide between the PS3 or Xbox 360 versions of a title. Let's face it -- wouldn't you rather play GTA IV on Xbox Live?

Sony's online experience is junky, at best. And although it continues to promise more in that arena, it still doesn't seem nearly as focused as it should be. According to Hirai, Blu-ray discs are still the "best and most efficient way to deliver content" and "when you consider that content that plays on PlayStation 3 can go as high as 50GB it's going to be very difficult to deliver 50GB to consumers in some parts of the world in a timely fashion."

In other words, Sony's online experience will continue to stink.

On the other hand, Nintendo is working diligently to look like a company that cares about online gaming, but most of the integration on that front has been mediocre. To make matters worse, the company's online roadmap is practically forgotten and it seems like it's more focused on "innovation in gaming" than anything else. That's a mistake.

Surely, Sony and Nintendo are downplaying the significance of online gaming, but how can they justify that mentality? According to "Online Gaming 2008" from NPD, 42 percent of Americans play games online and more than half of worldwide gamers play online. Among console gamers, more than 50 percent use the Xbox 360 to get their fix. But as NPD notes, "there is still a large, untapped market for gaming in general and online gaming in particular."

Are Nintendo and Sony really willing to forego that opportunity and surrender to Microsoft? It certainly looks that way.

Although it's currently sitting in the second spot, Microsoft's Xbox 360 will come out the winner of this generation as long as it maintains its strong relationship with developers and continues its dominance in the online space. If nothing else, Sony has shown that it will continue to cling to its outdated business model hoping for a redux of the 1990s, while Nintendo will try to stay true to its innovation plan.

That said, I just don't think either of those strategies can last much longer and both companies will be forced to adapt. When that happens, they will try to play Microsoft's game and fail miserably.

Regardless of what's going on right now, Microsoft is in the best position to win this generation's console war. Now we just need to sit back and wait for it to happen.

advertisement
 
Discover unlimited music for the price of one CD a month
Recent posts from The Digital Home
What Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo don't get
Why Sega should release a new console
The Digital Home 15: The Violent Video Game Edition
2010 will be an important year for Microsoft
What does the file sharing strikeout mean to us?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 38 comments (Page 1 of 4)
by Deerock71 May 8, 2008 10:47 AM PDT
I'll actually extract a bit of pertinent text from the article itself that adequately sums up the article in its entirety: "And while his desire to do that isn't quite rooted in reality, I guess you can't blame a guy for trying." The Xbox 360 is indeed headed towards the cellar this generation. It will never amass anything resembling even moderately successful sales in Japan, its already in the process of being overtaken by the PS3 in Europe, and the Wii is poised to overtake the final territory it doesn't have control of (the United States) before the end of summer. I honestly don't know how any clear thinking individual can see any other outcome than Wii finishing first this generation, PS3 finishing second, and the 360 finally reaping the bad seeds it has sown at the beginning of this generation.
Reply to this comment
by kake2k May 8, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
All I have to say, is you clearly do not have a ps3.
Reply to this comment
by DJOmega6 May 8, 2008 10:53 AM PDT
My friend, you act like America is the only country that matters, cuz that is the only territory the 360 has the lead, and BARELY over the Wii, with the PS3 slowly but surely making up ground. In Europe, PS3 just overtook 360 in overall sales, and the 360 doesn't even matter in Japan. Let's also not forget that with all the 360s that have gotten the red ring of death, overall 360 sales are somewhat exaggerated. This is the little fact that is conviently forgotten about when everyone talks about the 360 sales figures. Many people don't want to wait to send their bricked 360 off, and they go ahead and buy a new one. And before anyone goes off on me saying I do not know what I'm talking about, I work in retail and have seen this scenario way too much. With all this said, I do envy 360 owners who get to play Bioshock.
Reply to this comment
by redbarncoffee May 8, 2008 10:56 AM PDT
Hey buddy, have you even tried the new PS3 online store? Its getting to be right on par with Microsoft, and its FREE. Perhaps you should have mentioned this new service, and compared the prices in your article. But you know, that would be offering all the facts.
Reply to this comment
by WesHoogenboom May 8, 2008 11:20 AM PDT
I disagree. You stated it in the games, Games, games section. PS3 has the most/best? developers on board, especially in Japan and will have the best games now and in the future. "..Microsoft had Halo 3." Yep, and the 360 will keep floating on Halo 4 and 5, while poor product management (MS, XBOX1, Zune) and poor engineering (MS, RROD) sink it. Also, the technically inferior CPU/GPU and lack of, Blu-Ray, Wifi, and proprietary HDD. Microsoft has too many things to worry about presently. Sony will continue to innovate past it with software and hardware revisions. The PS3 is solid for dev and built for gaming, the 360 was rushed like the original and feels like it could give at any moment, which is probably the worst thing a gaming console could do well, besides burst into flames I suppose. The "console wars" are not a bad thing for us consumers anyway. Competition breeds innovation which proceeds to empty my checking account.
Reply to this comment
by asyouburn May 8, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
the only reason (well, one of the only reasons) the ps3 will reign supreme in this console war, is that in ten years when the dust has settled, only ten year old ps3's will still work.
Reply to this comment
by koolcat71 May 8, 2008 11:37 AM PDT
> And although the company still has Killzone 2, Microsoft had Halo 3. Although Sony has Metal Gear Solid 4, Gran Turismo 5, and Little Big Planet, the Xbox 360 lineup of games overall is much stronger. You forget PS3 exclusives and console sellers like FF XIII, GOWIII, RFOM II. At least 2 of those will be huuuge. Not to forget other exclusives like White Knight Chronicles, Disgae 3, Infamous, Uncharted II, Haze, Motorstorm 2, Eight Days and a number of unannounced internal Sony titles. MS still, still, still after 3 years has not fixed the RROD issue that plagues them everywhere they go. In the end, MS will abandon the 360 in about 2 years and move on and fall into last place.
Reply to this comment
by rasta024 May 8, 2008 11:47 AM PDT
I have all three systems(really)!!! The only time the Wii is played is when i have friends over at my place!A very nostalgic system of which I see no long term effect for those over the age of 12. Also Wii online is nonexistant which you must have to compete logtrem! The PS3 game lineup,lethargic at best, of which I have 12 games,the quality of which only Drakes Fortune can I compare to most 360 games! I own Madden 08 NHL 08 and GTA4 on both systems! 360 wins in framerate online play and graphics, by a landslide! As far as online play overall, I keep holding out for Sony to improve online play, but they have a long way to go to even come close to XBOX live! I gladly fork over my $50 every year for my XBOX live gold service! If sony could develope an online service like XBOX live I would gladly pay $50 for that as well! But their PS online service, as it stands right now is pretty much worthless even being free and even with the new update! These are comments from a diehard ps fan still crossing my fingers for sony to step up before the get too far behind! Those of you who want to bash the 360 JUST BECAUSE are doing yourselves a disservice! If you are true gamers, not investing in a 360, you guys are missing out on an awesome gaming experirnce!
Reply to this comment View reply
by rasta024 May 8, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
I have all three systems(really)!!! The only time the Wii is played is when i have friends over at my place!A very nostalgic system of which I see no long term effect for those over the age of 12. Also Wii online is nonexistant which you must have to compete logtrem! The PS3 game lineup,lethargic at best, of which I have 12 games,the quality of which only Drakes Fortune can I compare to most 360 games! I own Madden 08 NHL 08 and GTA4 on both systems! 360 wins in framerate online play and graphics, by a landslide! As far as online play overall, I keep holding out for Sony to improve online play, but they have a long way to go to even come close to XBOX live! I gladly fork over my $50 every year for my XBOX live gold service! If sony could develope an online service like XBOX live I would gladly pay $50 for that as well! But their PS online service, as it stands right now is pretty much worthless even being free and even with the new update! These are comments from a diehard ps fan still crossing my fingers for sony to step up before the get too far behind! Those of you who want to bash the 360 JUST BECAUSE are doing yourselves a disservice! If you are true gamers, not investing in a 360, you guys are missing out on an awesome gaming experirnce!
Reply to this comment
by JimmyTheSpider3 May 8, 2008 11:51 AM PDT
Test
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About The Digital Home

  • Don Reisinger is a technology columnist who has covered everything from HDTVs to computers to Flowbee Haircut Systems. Besides his work with CNET, Don's work has been featured in a variety of other publications including PC World and a host of Ziff-Davis publications.

    Don writes product reviews for InformationWeek and is a regular contributor to Processor Magazine. You can visit his personal site at DonReisinger.com or if you would like to email Don with questions or comments, drop him a line at CNETDigitalHome@gmail.com. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN

Subscribe to the Digital Home podcast

Have you ever wanted a no-nonsense discussion on what is really going with all the tech topics related to your Digital Home? If so, join Don Reisinger as he brings you the same biting commentary you've come to expect from his Digital Home blog in all its audio glory.


View all Digital Home podcast episode blog entries


Don on Twitter

Follow Don at Twitter

Don's del.icio.us bookmarks:

More...



advertisement
Click Here.
On BNET: IE users envy Firefox no more
Visit other CNET Networks sites: