The Sun Fire T2000 and T1000 use the UltraSparc T1 processor, code-named Niagara, a radical processor design that Sun hopes will turn around the Sparc family's market share losses. The Niagara systems are the second half of athat began three months ago when Sun introduced its .
The 3.5-inch-thick T2000 is available now with a minimum price of $7,795 and a maximum of $25,995. The T1000, half as thick but lacking the T2000's redundant components, will arrive in the first quarter of 2006 with prices ranging from $2,995 to $10,995.
Sun Microsystems released Sun Fire T2000 and T1000 servers, which use the UltraSparc T1 processor, code-named Niagara.
The releases are the second part of the company's effort to restore its ailing server fortunes by catering to its core customers.
The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company initially expected the systems to be used for lower-end Web-oriented tasks such as delivering Web pages. But the company gradually grew more ambitious, concluding that the T1-based machines also are good for running Java server software, mid-range databases, e-mail server software such as IBM's Lotus Notes and SAP's accounting and inventory software.
"We believe this is the finishing up of the reinvention of the product line," said Chief Marketing Officer Anil Gadre. "I believe Niagara will instill vast amount of new confidence in the direction of Sparc long-term."
Sun needs that confidence. Tarnished by delays and lackluster performance at the same time the dot-com implosion wiped out Sun's cachet, the Sparc line suffered at the hands of Power processors from IBM and x86 processors from Intel and Advanced Micro Devices.
In the third quarter of 2005, Sun's server revenue slipped 7.6 percent to $1.05 billion, while IBM, Hewlett-Packard and Dell all saw gains that outpaced the overall market growth of 5.6 percent. And though Sun prefers to emphasize unit shipments--a number that corresponds more directly with another part of Sun's recovery play, potential software sales--there, too, it lagged its top three rivals and the overall market.
Sun talked long and hard about Niagara years before its introduction. In the words of Karl Freund, vice president marketing for IBM's successful pSeries Unix server line, "When don't have great product, you'd better sell futures."
But now Sun also is revealing some performance scores as well as grand plans. The results are creditable, said Gabriel Consulting analyst Dan Olds.
Taking the 'Niagara' plunge
At a press event in New York, Sun Microsystems CEO Scott McNealy and Sun Executive Vice President David Yen unveil the Sun Fire T2000 and T1000 servers.
"These are pretty good benchmark numbers and certainly seem to put Sun back on the performance short list," Olds said.
And Sun has future Sparc plans. First will come Niagara blade servers, models that will share the same chassis as models using Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron x86 processor, said David Yen, executive vice president of the Sparc server group. The Niagara blade servers are due in the summer of 2006, he said.
Then, likely in 2007, will come Niagara II, built using a more advanced manufacturing process that permits smaller circuitry and therefore more features. One major feature will be multiprocessor support, so that unlike with the first generation more than one Niagara chip will fit into a server.
Then, in 2008, Sun expects to release servers with a chip code-named Rock, which is designed to have both the many cores and threads of Niagara but also fast single-thread performance.
With Niagara and Galaxy, Sun has bet that the high-volume, low-cost sales approach will pay off. "Obviously, they have to sell lots of systems of this size to pay back what has to be a considerably larger R&D investment than they have even with Galaxy," said Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff.
And selling low-cost products geared for high-volume markets can be hard on profit margins, said Merrill Lynch analyst Richard Farmer in a Monday report. "The continued trend towards the low end could pressure margins, though Sun has held or expanded margins during a similar mix shift in recent quarters," he said.
Now the race is on to see which of Sun's two new server lines fares better as Sun tries to regain its footing. "He (Yen) has got a new-age processor going into a hungry, installed base. I've got a great x86 system that can run any operating system," said John Fowler, head of Sun's x86 server group.
There's no competition between the two executives, though. "We don't have any friendly wagers," Fowler said, adding that it's "not a bad idea, though."
Three factors figure prominently in Sun's attempt to tout Niagara: relatively low power consumption, an ability to perform many tasks in parallel, and a price tag designed to compete with cheap x86 servers as well as lower-end Unix machines from IBM and HP.
"We are pricing our systems very, very competitively, even compared with the x86 standard," Yen said.
Eachhas eight processing engines, called cores, and can run 32 simultaneous instruction sequences, called threads. The entire chip consumes a maximum of 72 watts, considerably less than .
A complete Niagara system--including memory, hard drives and other subsystems--consumes about 180 watts for the T1000 and 325 watts for the T2000, Yen said.
To tout the power features, Sun has added a new element to standard speed tests that divides the score by power consumption measured in watts and server space measured in 1.75-inch rack units. The test--called SWaP, short for space, wattage and performance--divides a performance score by a server's space and power consumption, which means the relative scores go up for small, energy-efficient machines.
McNealy on Dell
At a press event unveiling a T1 chip-based server line, Sun CEO Scott McNealy explains how his company lost market share, but is bouncing back.
Both systems require Sun's newest operating system, Solaris 10. Among about 100 customers so far are eBay and Air France, Sun said.
To salvage imperfect UltraSparc T1 chips, Sun will sell models with four and six cores as well. And in the first quarter of 2006, it will release the cheapest models that use chips running at 1GHz.
With Niagara, a given thread won't be executed as fast as with conventional processors. But with 32 threads in process at the same time, the T1000 and T2000 systems are designed to run lots of tasks at the same time.
"Aggregate performance is what really counts," said Microprocessor Report Editor-in-Chief Kevin Krewell.
Speed test scores
Sun broke its silence on Niagara performance, publishing several speed tests to tout it. Among them:
On the SPECjbb2005 test of Java server software, the T2000 scored 63,378 business operations per second compared with 61,789 for an IBM p5-550 with two dual-core Power5 chips and 24,208 for a Dell PowerEdge SC1425 with dual single-core Xeon processors.
On the SPECweb2005 test of Web server performance, the T2000 scored 14,001, compared with 7,881 for an IBM p5-550 with two dual-core Power5 processors, 4,850 for a Dell PowerEdge 2850 with two dual-core Xeon processors, and 4,348 for an IBM x345 with dual single-core Xeon processors.
On the NotesBench test of Lotus Notes performance, a T2000 accommodated 19,000 users at $4.35 per user and got a NotesMark score of 16,061. In comparison, an eight-processor IBM p5-570 had 17,400 users, a cost of $10.19 per user, and a NotesMark score of 14,740. But the average response time of the IBM system was 270 microseconds compared with the slower 400 microseconds for the T2000, demonstrating the relatively slow single-thread performance of the Sun system.
Despite the good scores, it's not clear whether Niagara is a "home run," Olds said.
"Right now, it's kind of a niche product--it's a big damn niche to be sure, but still a niche. I think Sun needs a compelling story for general-purpose computing in order to return to health, and I just don't see that right now."
IBM, unsurprisingly, remains unconvinced the UltraSparc T1 will escape a small low-end market segment.
Video: McNealy heralds 'participation age'
Sun's CEO explains why the Information Age is history and how consumers are interacting with the Web more than ever.
"With Niagara, you're talking about a very niche architecture that is going to confuse the market with yet another alternative from Sun when going after Dell's customers for small workloads," Freund said. "It has no place as a general-purpose computer running databases."
And Sun has been damaged by its past processor performance. "This roadmap they've been touting now for quite a while has very little credibility and is not strong," Freund said.
And HP set up a Niagara-bashing Web site, casting aspersions on its single-thread performance and raising questions about whether software will have to be optimized for the new chip. (Sun argues that current software will run just fine on Niagara.)
Sun remains bullish that Niagara will help the company compete against rivals x86 and Unix systems. "It is a crossover product," Yen said. "The timing is right as the Internet build-out continues. We expect a significant wide adoption."