CNN reports on a streaming video channel that edits classic television sitcoms down to four-minute webisodes.
The network offers a variety of programming from Dilbert to Diff'rent Strokes, but is something lost in translation as the video editors slice and dice everything from the original that is considered not essential? Are these mostly ancient sitcoms even worth watching today in either form? While I can't be certain whether it's a result of the hack jobs or the dated material, most of the mini-episodes I watched felt incomplete and not really worth watching. The editing was clean and seamless, but the stories lacked any real development (something that's already a problem with the sitcom genre). The jokes were still there and the punchlines were also kept intact, but the timing was wrong and the humor was all but lost on me.
It's hard to do short-form content well. In fact much of the user-created content on the web shares the same pitfalls that Minisodes suffers from. The reality is that you can't tell the same story in four minutes that you can in 40 and Minisodes points out the downside to this new trend in video.
If a story is designed from day one to fit a short-form format it will be far less clunky than these cut-ups, but the format will still provide very limited room for character and story development. Despite producing short form content myself, I'm worried that this evolution towards shorter and shorter material is actually a trip in the wrong direction. I suppose it's a bit puzzling that my experiences perusing an abbreviated version of Who's The Boss was what snapped me into that realization.