Microsoft to detail legal case
The software giant is expected to outline a defense in its high-stakes antitrust battle with the DOJ and 20 states.
The filing will be made in U.S. District Court in Washington. Both sides are working long hours in gathering and analyzing evidence that will support them in trial, set to begin September 8. Litigators say the pace in the case is likely to be feverish, given the fast-track schedule and consequences.
"There is a hotbed of activity going on right now," said Hillard Sterling, an antitrust attorney at Gordon & Glickson, who recently took on the Federal Trade Commission in a high-profile merger case of two office supply stores. "Microsoft needs to unleash a comprehensive, strong attack on the government's case."
The software giant already has revealed how it intends to counter allegations that it has illegally tied its Internet Explorer browser to its Windows operating system to stifle the competitive threat posed by Netscape Communications.
Microsoft tipped its hand in a brief filed last week asking a federal judge in Salt Lake City, Utah, to compel rival Novell to turn over evidence in the case. It accused the networking software firm of "deliberately trying to stymie Microsoft's efforts to secure evidence."
The filing added Microsoft had sent a subpoena to Novell and six other makers of operating systems--including Sun Microsystems, IBM, Apple Computer, Caldera, Network Computer, and Santa Cruz Operation, requesting "seven narrowly focused requests."
But Rich Gray, an antitrust attorney at Bergeson, Eliopoulos, Grady, & Gray, disagreed with Smith's view, saying the earlier decision did not deal with specific allegations at the heart of the newer case, which is based broadly on federal antitrust statutes.