Want CNET to notify you of price drops and the latest stories?
X
iOS 17 Won't Support These iPhonesCNET CouponsWatchOS 10 Fitness PerksBest Solar CompaniesRemote Working in ParadiseBest Satellite Internet ProvidersMortgage RatesMeal Subscription vs. Takeout
Intel admits rushing dual-core Pentiums
Intel admits rushing dual-core Pentiums
Rich Brown Former Senior Editorial Director - Home and Wellness
Rich was the editorial lead for CNET's Home and Wellness sections, based in Louisville, Kentucky. Before moving to Louisville in 2013, Rich ran CNET's desktop computer review section for 10 years in New York City. He has worked as a tech journalist since 1994, covering everything from 3D printing to Z-Wave smart locks.
Expertise Smart home, Windows PCs, cooking (sometimes), woodworking tools (getting there...)
true
A popped up on News.com this morning, reporting on an item that originally appeared on IDG's news service. At the recent Hot Chips conference in Palo Alto, California, Intel engineer Jonathan Douglas admitted that Intel's first batch of dual-core chips was rushed to the marketplace in order to compete with AMD.
"We needed a competitive response. We were behind," was part of Douglas's explanation. As to what Intel needed to respond, Douglas presumably meant AMD's impending release of its own dual-core CPU's. Intel technically ended up beating AMD to market by two weeks when its Pentium Extreme Edition 840 desktop CPU hit OEMs ahead of AMD's dual-core Opteron server chips. The difference in quality for desktop chips became apparent when we tested AMD's dual-core Athlon X2 4800+ desktop processor upon its release in May. Because Intel scrambled to beat AMD to market, its single core-designed packaging simply couldn't power the Pentium D chips efficiently enough to compete with AMD's X2 series. The result: AMD's dual-core chip beat Intel's across the board on our benchmarks.
It remains to be seen whether Intel's forthcoming Presler dual-core chip (due in Q1 2006) and accompanying chipset will overtake AMD. We can say now, though, that if you'd like to purchase a dual-core CPU-based PC in the next six months, by Intel's own admission, you're better off choosing AMD.
"We needed a competitive response. We were behind," was part of Douglas's explanation. As to what Intel needed to respond, Douglas presumably meant AMD's impending release of its own dual-core CPU's. Intel technically ended up beating AMD to market by two weeks when its Pentium Extreme Edition 840 desktop CPU hit OEMs ahead of AMD's dual-core Opteron server chips. The difference in quality for desktop chips became apparent when we tested AMD's dual-core Athlon X2 4800+ desktop processor upon its release in May. Because Intel scrambled to beat AMD to market, its single core-designed packaging simply couldn't power the Pentium D chips efficiently enough to compete with AMD's X2 series. The result: AMD's dual-core chip beat Intel's across the board on our benchmarks.
It remains to be seen whether Intel's forthcoming Presler dual-core chip (due in Q1 2006) and accompanying chipset will overtake AMD. We can say now, though, that if you'd like to purchase a dual-core CPU-based PC in the next six months, by Intel's own admission, you're better off choosing AMD.