A brief history of Zune economics
Will consumers be persuaded by Microsoft's recent Zune pass savings calculations, or has history already played this iPod-bashing tactic out.
Microsoft's latest anti-Apple campaign has set its sights on the iTunes music store. Using a 30-second video and an interactive calculator, Microsoft makes a case that their $15/month subscription music service is an awesome value compared to the $30,000 it would take to fill a 120GB Apple iPod Classic using iTunes.
Microsoft's argument is riddled with fallacies. For starters, it's naive to think that people are filling MP3 players with purchased music. I'm no pirate, but at least half (probably more) of my MP3 music library comes from friends, freebies, CDs, eMusic trials, and God-only-knows--which doesn't account for the movies, photos, and podcasts that make up a healthy chunk of my MP3 players.
Also, how many people completely fill their MP3 player (especially the 120GB iPod Classic used in the example). Or what about the fact that Microsoft's $15 monthly fee adds up to $180 a year? The reality is, the numbers don't matter. History has already played out this fight enough times to show the futility of Microsoft's economic pitch.
To refresh everyone's memory, here's a brief history of products and services that sought to unseat iTunes by appealing to consumers' wallets.
Napster
In a famously bad 2005 Super Bowl ad, Napster pitched their monthly subscription music service using fuzzy math similar to Microsoft's. Granted, 2005 was a different economic environment than the one we find ourselves in today, but the campaign was such a spectacular flop, you'd figure Zune would steer clear of using such a similar approach.
Sirius & XM
Sansa Connect
The SanDisk Sansa Connect was the tech journalism toast of 2007, walking away with a four-star CNET rating and a Best of CES award. Unfortunately, in spite of promotion from Yahoo, and a major retail push by SanDisk, no one bought the thing. By the end of 2008, Yahoo pulled the plug on their subscription music service and rolled their customers over to Rhapsody.
URGE
eMusic
I still have a soft spot in my heart for eMusic. These guys have been offering inexpensive, DRM-free music downloads years before iTunes was even on the scene. I see eMusic billboards in the subway, on bus benches, and in magazines, and their promotional fliers promising "50 free downloads" seem to litter my desk every time I open a new MP3 player. The problem with eMusic isn't price or promotion. Limited selection and monthly subscription model have probably turned off some users, but in the end, eMusic's biggest problem is the one faced by all the other products and services mentioned above: they're not Apple.
I don't mean that last statement as some kind of Apple fanboy praise. In fact, the Zune and Zune Pass service still power most of my day-to-day listening. But as someone who spends a good deal of time talking with people about MP3 players and music downloads, I've come to realize that the runaway popularity of the iPod and iTunes defies logic. Even Apple has to be a little surprised that they have a product that recently enjoyed a peak market share of 92%. How do you fight a phenomena like that? Where do you begin?
I don't know how to topple Apple's domination over the MP3 player market and music downloads. What I do know is that devices and services offering unlimited music at $15 a month haven't survived on value arguments alone, especially with DRM-free options such as eMusic (or, let's face it--piracy) are out there offering a better deal.
As a Zune user, it's my hope that Microsoft spends less time slinging mud at Apple and more time bringing the quality of the Zune Marketplace experience on par with iTunes.
Home Entertainment Guides
TVs
Streaming & TV Accessories
Speakers
Projectors
Other Home Entertainment