'It's Abhorrent': Activists Condemn Rise in Fossil Fuel Reps at COP27 Climate Talks

Global Witness reports a 25% increase in fossil fuel representatives at this year's UN climate summit.

Katie Collins Senior European Correspondent
Katie a UK-based news reporter and features writer. Officially, she is CNET's European correspondent, covering tech policy and Big Tech in the EU and UK. Unofficially, she serves as CNET's Taylor Swift correspondent. You can also find her writing about tech for good, ethics and human rights, the climate crisis, robots, travel and digital culture. She was once described a "living synth" by London's Evening Standard for having a microchip injected into her hand.
Katie Collins
3 min read
At COP27 a protester holds a sign reading "End All Forms of Support for Fossil Fuels

Many feel the fossil fuel industry has no place in climate talks. This protest sign was outside the COP27 venue on Nov. 9.

Mohammed Abed/AFP via Getty Images

As world leaders gather in Egypt this week to engage with scientists, nongovernmental organizations, activists and other experts to decide how best to wean society off its fossil fuel dependency, there is one set of guests at the party who are not entirely welcome.

Of the 44,000-plus people registered to attend this year's COP27 climate summit, at least 636 are representatives of fossil fuel companies, according to research released Thursday by Global Witness, an international NGO. That figure, which was calculated by advocacy groups Corporate Accountability and Corporate Europe Observatory together with Global Witness, represents an increase of over 25% compared to the 503 fossil fuel reps at COP26 last year in Glasgow, Scotland.

To put that into context, the fossil fuel contingent is bigger than any national delegation at this year's conference other than the UAE, which has 1,070 delegates (70 of whom are fossil fuel lobbyists). In total, 29 countries have chosen to include fossil fuel reps as part of their delegations, with Russia bringing 33. The numbers were calculated using information provided by delegates and included on the list of registrations published by the UNFCCC.

Scientists have attributed greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels to be the cause of the climate crisis, leading to extreme weather events that are causing death and destruction across the world. Due to its documented history of climate change denial, greenwashing, destruction of natural habitats and human rights violations, there is significant resistance from many corners to the fossil fuel industry having a seat at climate talks. 

"Tobacco lobbyists wouldn't be welcome at health conferences, arms dealers can't promote their trade at peace conventions," said a spokesperson for Global Witness and its partners in a statement. "Those perpetuating the world's fossil fuel addiction should not be allowed through the doors of a climate conference."

Activists, NGOs and many others are wary of the motives of fossil fuel companies, which are known to invest heavily in lobbying as a way to influence lawmakers, and strongly believe they should be excluded from discussions. Instead, they want the voices of communities that are most impacted by the climate crisis around the world to be central to planning the just transition to renewable energy. 

But this year at COP27, there are more fossil fuel reps than delegates from the 10 countries most affected by climate change combined.

The presence of fossil fuel representatives is especially galling to Ukrainian climate activist Svitlana Romanko. She made the difficult journey to attend COP27 to lobby lawmakers to defund fossil fuel companies who she says are complicit in supporting and profiting from Russia's war in Ukraine.

"It is abhorrent that these dirty dealers are allowed to meddle in climate talks," she said. "Some of them are complicit in Russia's war crimes and should be under international tribunal together with bloody petro-dictator Putin rather than lobbying at the highest levels or earning credibility, being a part of national delegations."

The figures of fossil fuels reps also serve to exacerbate resentment among many African activists and climate experts that COP27 has been labeled "the African COP," when African perspectives and voices aren't being centered.

"I feel that Africans actually should be given priority," said Goodness Dickson, a climate activist from the Eco Clean Active Initiative in Nigeria. The African COP was supposed to be inclusive, said Dickson, but many from the continent have struggled to attend due to difficulty obtaining accreditation and visas, as well as the high prices of flights and accommodation in Sharm-el-Sheikh, the city hosting the summit.

"There's been a lot of lip service paid to this being the so-called African COP, but how are you going to address the dire climate impacts on the continent, when the fossil fuel delegation is larger than that of any African country?" said Phillip Jakpor from Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa in a statement.

The influence of fossil fuel companies on climate policy is not just a concern for activists and NGOs. On Tuesday, the UN released a report full of recommendations to crack down on greenwashing in corporate net zero campaigns, including banning companies from funding fossil fuel lobbyists.

"This is about cutting emissions, not corners," said Catherine McKenna, chair of the UN expert group that assembled the report. "Right now, the planet cannot afford delays, excuses or more greenwashing."