Samsung ST93 review: Samsung ST93

The Samsung ST93 is a small and good-looking camera that is ideal for snapping away but its quality is not as good as its rivals.

Nik Rawlinson

Nik Rawlinson

Nik Rawlinson has been writing about tech since Windows 95 was looking distinctly futuristic. He is a former Editor of MacUser magazine and one-time scribe for Personal Computer World. Nik is a freelance writer and is not an employee of CNET.

See full bio
5 min read

The Samsung ST93 looks lovely. It doesn't quite rival the Canon Ixus 230HS, but it comes close, with a small body and neatly rounded corners. The Ixus 230HS set a very high bar, earning itself a five-star rating for its sharp images, great colours and excellent level of detail. The ST93 didn't match it on that front, but at less than half the price it deserves a closer look.


Samsung ST93

The Good

Small; Inexpensive.

The Bad

Poor low-light performance; Limited options.

The Bottom Line

It was always going to be tough fitting 16 megapixels in a body this size for less than £100, and sadly the Samsung ST93's results fall short of what we would like to see in a modern digital camera. If you're looking for a cheap and cheerful snapper, this will do the job, but if quality is your primary concern then look to spend a little more.

Samsung's Shrunken Shooter

One way in which Samsung has kept things on a Lilliputian scale is through its choice of memory format. It's opted for microSD, which is just 1mm thick and 15 x11mm face on. That's less than half the size of regular SD in every direction, and around a quarter of the weight of the average SD card. Fortunately there's very little difference in price with this format, and the cards are often sold with an adaptor to make themcompatible with regular card readers.

Samsung ST93 display
The Samsung ST93 has small but useable buttons.

The buttons are small but perfectly useable, and the menu is stripped down to the essentials, which makes it easy to find your way around without frequent reference to the manual.


So, that's all good -- and so is the super-quiet zoom, which lets you frame your shot without turning heads. It's also very quick to fix its focus, so you shouldn't miss a spontaneous shot.

Samsung ST93 zoom
The Samsung ST93 has a super-quiet zoom.

Smart Auto mode does an excellent job of picking the most appropriate settings for whatever you're currently framing, displaying the current aperture setting in the corner of the screen and automatically selecting macro when required.

Battery life it particularly impressive; after three days of shooting the gauge still showed two thirds of its power remaining. In other respects, though, the ST93 left us disappointed.

To get the best results you really need well-lit surroundings. It had a tendency to demand the flash in what we would consider fairly bright situations where the flash would have little effect anyway because the framing encompassed so large an area. When we manually suppressed it, the ST93 responded by dialling up its sensitivity, as we would expect, but with a corresponding impact on the quality of the picture.

The image below was shot in a marketplace with a glass ceiling that lets light in. It was shot in the middle of the afternoon on a sunny day. In fully automatic mode the ST93 increased its sensitivity to ISO 400, which impacted on the level of detail captured in the more intricate parts of the image. This is most noticeable in the grid to which the ducks are tied, where fine detail is lost in the upper quarter of the frame. For comparison, we have included a detail section of the same image as taken by the Canon PowerShot SX150 IS, outlined in red. The Canon hiked its sensitivity still further -- to ISO 640 -- yet as can be seen it retained sharper detail in this area, most likely because of the lower pixel count on its sensor (14mp).

Detail test
Sadly this image displayed a higher level of noise than we had hoped, despite the fair lighting conditions (click image to enlarge).

In this shot of a flower stall, sensitivity was pinned at a more conservative ISO 240 and the shutter speed was increased from 1/15 to 1/30 second, but as can be seen from the results this is still too slow for handheld shooting. 

Detail test
The shutter speed was too slow for us to hold this still enough to eliminate motion blur (click image to enlarge).

This may limit the ST93's appeal in some situations. When presented with a scene that is both broad and deep, you can't rely on the flash to provide adequate illumination, whatever camera you're using. Neither can you use a tripod in a busy street or market. You therefore need a shooter that can capture sufficient light with a relatively short exposure to minimise shake, without increasing sensitivity to a level that introduces too much noise into the picture. On this front, the ST93 fares poorly.

In situations where the level of light made it possible to both minimise the sensitivity setting and increase the shutter speed to a level suitable for hand-held operation, the results were much improved. This picture of St Paul's Cathedral reflected in a chrome ball demonstrates good, sharp edges to the ball and an excellent dynamic range with good, even colour levels across the full spectrum.

Detail test
In more favourable lighting conditions, the ST93 put in a good performance, with accurate colours and sharp edges (click image to enlarge).

In this picture of an apple stall, the fruit is very well rendered, and there's great differentiation in the subtle red and green shifts as you move from crate to crate. Sensitivity has been kept down to ISO 80, but the shutter speed remains a fairly slow 1/60 second, which will still be too slow for some users to keep steady when shooting by hand. 

Detail test
There's good colour detail here, with smooth transitions between areas of similar tone (click image to enlarge).

Our interior still life test threw up some mixed results. Under studio lighting the ST93 performed very well, dropping its sensitivity to ISO 80 and the shutter speed to 1/60, which helped keep noise to a minimum (we were using a tripod on this occasion). When we switched to ambient lighting it naturally had to increase the sensitivity to ISO 640 and slowed the shutter speed yet further to 1/20 second, at which point there was a noticeably increased level of noise in the image. It found a happy medium when we forced the flash, producing a sharp, well exposed result, full of crisp detail and realistic colours. 

Detail test
Mixed results from our still life test, but we were impressed by the ST93's studio- and flash-lit results (click image to enlarge).

Creative credentials

There's an impressive range of firmware helpers for the less confident shooter, with some smart scene modes that go beyond the regular sunset, snow and landscape options (which are also present).

Object highlight, for example, takes two shots and combines them to give your subject a blurred background; beauty shot smooths your subject's skin; and magic frame drops them into a graphic overlay. Some of these are great, putting your subject onto the cover of a magazine or inside a TV screen. 

Detail test

Detail test

There's a sweep-to-shoot panorama feature, too, which detects the direction in which you're moving and stitches together the scene in real time.

Movie mode

Here, the ST93 performed fairly well. It responded extremely well to changing light levels and even when we shot directly towards the sun it managed to properly capture the rest of the frame, keeping colours true without dialling down the exposure.

The zoom is quiet in general use, as we stated above, but if you're a belts-and-braces shooter who would rather take no chances then you'll want to switch on the Sound Alive feature, which dips the soundtrack recording volume as you move the lens in and out. On the one hand this is a good thing -- nobody wants to hear the whirring of motors on the film of a best friend's wedding -- but on the other it isn't ideal (we want to hear the vows, after all). It's effective, doing exactly what it promised and keeping our movie free from the sound of any mechanics.


The ST93 has much going for it. Battery, size and firmware features all earn it some serious ticks. Where it really matters, though -- the quality of its pictures -- it's more difficult to recommend. Those 16 megapixels sure sound appealing, but in reality it's too many for the sensor to handle. This is a shame, as Samsung has an excellent pedigree when it comes to producing top-notch cameras. Check out the company's WB700, which earned itself four stars and high praise in our review. It may be another two-thirds more expensive than this example, but if you can afford it, then it would be money very well spent.