X
CNET logo Why You Can Trust CNET

Our expert, award-winning staff selects the products we cover and rigorously researches and tests our top picks. If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Reviews ethics statement

RunCore Pro V Max review: RunCore Pro V Max

RunCore Pro V Max

Dong Ngo SF Labs Manager, Editor / Reviews
CNET editor Dong Ngo has been involved with technology since 2000, starting with testing gadgets and writing code for CNET Labs' benchmarks. He now manages CNET San Francisco Labs, reviews 3D printers, networking/storage devices, and also writes about other topics from online security to new gadgets and how technology impacts the life of people around the world.
Dong Ngo
5 min read

I ran into RunCore the first time during CES 2012 and the Pro V Max SSD, introduced at the show, is one of the company's first standard solid-state drives for the U.S. market.

6.9

RunCore Pro V Max

The Good

The <b>RunCore Pro V Max SSD</b> provides fast boot times and great application performance. The drive supports SATA 3 (6Gbps) and comes in a sturdy aluminum casing.

The Bad

The RunCore Pro V Max's current price is above average for its copy speed, which could use some improvement.

The Bottom Line

While the RunCore Pro V Max SSD will greatly improve a computer's overall performance, its for now unreasonably high price tag will steer you to the alternatives.

If the first step is always the hardest, the biggest challenge of a drive is its pricing. At around $2 per gigabyte, the Pro V Max is one of the most expensive SSDs on the market, while offering similar performance to many others I have reviewed.

To slightly make up for this, the drive comes in very sleek aluminum casing and offers top boot times and very fast application performance. It supports SATA 3 and will work in all applications where a regular 2.5-inch standard SATA drive is used.

To be fair, the new drive isn't the most expensive on the market and RunCore said that consumers will find its street price to be noticeably lower than the current suggested retail pricing, which is about $450 for the 240GB version, for example. Until then, you might also want to check out other SATA 3-based SSDs that offer similar performance, if not better, for lower cost, such as the Samsung 830 series, or any of the others on this list.

Design and features

Drive type Internal drive
Connector options SATA 3 (6Gbps), SATA 2, SATA
Available capacities 60GB,120GB, 240GB, 480GB
Product dimensions 9-mm thick, 2.5-inch standard
Capacity of test unit 240GB
OSes supported Windows, Mac, Linux

Apart from the sturdy aluminum casing, the RunCore Pro V Max is very much a regular SATA 3 SSD, powered by the almost year-old SandForce SF-2281 controller and using asynchronous flash memory for its data storage. The drive comes in the 2.5-inch, 9mm-thick SATA standard and will work with SATA (1.5 Gpbs), SATA 2 (3Gbps), and SATA 3 (6Gbps). To get its top performance, you should use it with a computer that supports SATA 3, however.

According to RunCore, the drive supports RAID and TRIM and has an MTBF rating of 2 million hours, longer than many other SSDs. The drive's static and dynamic wear-leveling algorithms help increase its life span. Wear leveling is a technology that makes sure all flash cells share the same amount of program/erase cycles to fight against the finite writing attribute of flash memory by spreading out the wear evenly.

Like all SSDs, the Pro V Max can handle shocks and uses much less energy than a traditional hard drive. It worked with all operating systems I tried it with, including Windows, Mac OS, and Linux.

Cost per gigabyte
On average, all capacities of the Pro V Max cost around $2 per gigabyte--except for the $159, 60GB version, which is about $2.65 per gig--making it one of the more expensive SSDs on the market. The OCZ Octane, for example, costs around $1.5 per gigabyte and even the top-of-the-line Samsung 830 series costs just around $1.7 per gigabyte. To be fair, that's comparing the suggested retail price of the Pro V Max with the street prices of other drives. RunCore insists that the Pro V Max's street price will soon be lowered, which should bring it in line with other drives. It's my guess that since RunCore is also an OEM provider of SSDs, it doesn't want to compete with its partners, for now.

Cost per GB (based on current street prices)
RunCore Pro V Max (240GB)
$2.00 
RunCore Pro V Max (120GB)
$2.08 
RunCore Pro V Max (480GB)
$2.08 
RunCore Pro V Max (60GB)
$2.65 

Performance
The Pro V Max did well in my testing, taking just 11 seconds to boot up its host computer, the shortest boot time I've seen, though by just 1 second. Note that most SSDs help the host computer take a very short time to start up. The Pro V Max provides a typical SSD shutdown time of around 6 seconds.

While it's hard to put this in numbers, the drive also boosts application performance a great deal. This means apps that would normally take a while to load from a hard drive, such as big games, now take a much shorter time to load. StarCraft 2, which is by the way my most favorite part of the testing, took about 20 seconds less to load from the Pro V Max than when the test machine was using a hard drive. Other applications, such as Word, Excel, and Firefox, popped up instantly. The computer would also resume from sleep mode almost instantly. Overall, the RunCore Pro V Max offered a much better computing experience than a hard drive.

Where the drive didn't impress very much was its copy test, which is by the way not the strength of SSDs. Generally speaking, SSDs are designed for random access and not sequential access. When used as a secondary drive, the Pro V Max managed an average of around 187MBps, which put it right in the middle of the charts. When used as the main hard drive hosting the operating system--the most popular use of an SSD--the Pro V Max, now having to write and read at the same time, dropped to around 93MBps, which is again average for SATA 3-based SSDs.

Boot and shutdown time (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Shutdown  
Boot time  
WD VelociRaptor 300GB
12.2 
56.2 
OCZ Agility 3
6.7 
14.7 
OCZ Vertex 3
5.8 
14.1 
Crucial M4
6.8 
13.7 
SanDisk Ultra
7.2 
13.5 
Patriot Pyro
6 
12.5 
OCZ Octane
6.3 
12 
RunCore Pro V Max
6 
11 

Data transfer speed (in MBps)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
As secondary drive  
As OS drive  
Samsung 830 Series
261.63 
172.88 
Plextor PX-256M2S
261 
162.03 
OCZ Vertex 3
260.71 
150.01 
Crucial M4
235.51 
117.99 
OCZ Agility 3
207.75 
101.67 
Patriot Pyro
190.01 
76.44 
RunCore Pro V Max
186.78 
92.55 
OCZ Octane
183.41 
135.43 
WD VelociRaptor 600GB
126.33 
58.05 
Seagate Barracuda XT
115.71 
51.1 
WD VelociRaptor 300GB
112.59 
47.12 
SanDisk Ultra
96.4 
65.6 

Service and support
RunCore backs the Pro V Max with a three-year warranty, which is not as good as the five years offered by some other companies, but not so bad, either. On RunCore's Web site there's currently no information on the Pro V Max since this is a new drive, but the company says information will be available soon.

Conclusion
The RunCore Pro V Max is a very good replacement drive for your computer, be it a desktop or a laptop. Its high pricing, however, makes it much less appealing than it could be.

6.9

RunCore Pro V Max

Score Breakdown

Design 8Features 6Performance 7Support 7