HP Compaq Presario CQ62 review: HP Compaq Presario CQ62

Editors' note: This review is part of our 2010 retail laptop and desktop back-to-school roundup, covering specific fixed configurations of popular systems that can be found in retail stores.

5.8

HP Compaq Presario CQ62

The Good

Affordable; updated and attractive design and good build quality; offers enough performance for basic home use; roomy display; comfortable keyboard; 802.11n Wi-Fi.

The Bad

Very stiff mouse button is uncomfortable to use; single-core processor lags behind slightly pricier dual-core laptops; no Webcam; no media card reader; touch pad doesn't support multitouch gestures.

The Bottom Line

Sluggish performance is usually the deal breaker for an entry-level laptop, and though the single-core Compaq Presario CQ62-215DX is far from a speed merchant, its biggest flaw isn't a lack of power but rather the finger power it requires to depress the stiff mouse button.

With any entry-level laptop, the first order of business is to figure out which features were sacrificed in order to hit a bargain-basement price. With the $349 Compaq Presario CQ62-215DX--one of the least expensive non-Netbook laptops available--you must make do with a single-core AMD Sempron processor, only 2GB of memory, neither a Webcam nor a media card reader, and so-so battery life. So, what does your $349 get you? For starters, an updated, attractive design, which is particularly impressive given the price. Most low-end laptops look the part, but the Compaq Presario CQ62 could pass for a laptop that costs double or triple its price. A comfortable keyboard sits below the roomy 15.6-inch display, though the single dual-use mouse button is stiff and difficult to use.

The Compaq Presario CQ62-215DX is unquestionably a looker for an entry-level laptop. The Toshiba Satellite C655-S5049 costs $50 less, however, and though it may have a less inspired design, it's more comfortable in use with its multitouch touch pad and superior (and separate) mouse buttons.

The Presario CQ62's performance is acceptable for basic, everyday use--the same tasks you'd use a Netbook for--but dual-core laptops cost only a bit more and offer much greater performance and likely a longer lifespan.

HP rolled out a long-overdue design update to its laptops earlier this year, and we're pleased to see the makeover extend down to the entry-level Presario CQ62. The glossy surfaces, chrome accents, and tapered edges of the previous design have been replaced with a simpler, more unified look. The chassis is made from a textured plastic that looks and feels like a Sony Vaio chassis (rarely a bad thing). The CQ62's matte-black casing features a textured diamond pattern.

The keyboard features wide, flat keys that result in a comfortable typing experience. HP leaves off a dedicated number pad, which only a small set of people--gamers, accountants, and data-entry jockeys--may miss, but it adds a column of shortcut keys along the left side of the keyboard. The keys offer one-button access to Windows Live Mail, CyberLink PowerDVD 9, your default browser, a print window, and a calculator. It will take some getting used to, however, before you're not hitting the print key instead of Shift, the calculator key instead of the Alt key, or caps lock instead of the "a" key.

We were never fans of the glossy touch pads of past HP and Compaq laptops, which struck us as an example of putting form before function. They may have looked good on a store shelf, but in use they created drag against your mousing finger. HP's new laptop design does away with the glossy touch pads; the Compaq Presario CQ62 features a touch pad with a matte finish. In fact, the textured design of the keyboard deck runs uninterrupted across the touch pad. Though we like the feel of the touch pad, we were disappointed to find it doesn't support multitouch gestures such as two-finger scrolling. We're seeing multitouch touch pads on more and more laptops, including Toshiba's entry-level Satellite C655-S5049.

A small LED sits in the upper-left corner of the touch pad. Double tap the corner, and the LED glows orange, alerting you that the touch pad is disabled. Double tap again, and the LED turns off and the touch pad is back in action. Neat.

Below the touch pad is a single mouse button bar; we prefer two separate mouse buttons. The button is very stiff, and didn't loosen up in the days we banged on the laptop during the course of this review. You really need to be deliberate with your mouse clicks--so deliberate, in fact, that we found ourselves using the click function of the touch pad to avoid struggling with the mouse button. As part of the laptop that a user interacts with the most, it's hard to fathom why more care wasn't used with designing the mouse button.

The laptop features Altec Lansing stereo speakers, and we were mildly impressed with their output. They are loud and clear enough at max volume to hear movie dialogue, but like nearly every laptop speaker set, they lack the depth to deliver satisfying music playback.

Not surprisingly, the Presario CQ62 lacks higher-end, but increasingly common, connections such as HDMI and eSATA ports and an ExpressCard slot. Many budget laptops leave these out. We were surprised, however, to find a media card reader absent; the even-cheaper Toshiba Satellite C655-S5049 features this convenient slot. But like the entry-level Satellite, the Presario leaves off a Webcam. The Presario does supply an always appreciated Wi-Fi on/off button (mapped to the F12 key). Lastly, some entry-level laptops cut a corner by leaving offer Draft N Wi-Fi, but that is not the case here.

The Compaq Presario CQ62-215DX is based on the single-core AMD Sempron processor. It's clocked at 2.2GHz, which is the same speed as the single-core Intel Celeron 900 chip on the Toshiba Satellite C665-S5049. In testing, both systems trailed the budget laptops with dual-core CPUs, the cheapest of which cost $150 to $200 more. The slowest dual-core system, the Dell Inspiron iM510R-1212PBL, was 16 percent faster on the multitasking benchmark than the Compaq CQ62. The Presario CQ62's only win occurred on our multitasking benchmark, where it bested the Satellite C665 by 34 percent. On our Photoshop and iTunes tests, the Compaq CQ62 finished dead last, trailing the Satellite C665 by 26 percent on both tests.

In anecdotal testing, we found that the Presario CQ62-215DX provided acceptable performance when writing this review in Word while Web surfing. It's only when you begin running more-intensive, multithreaded apps like Photoshop that can take advantage of multiple CPU cores do you notice some sluggishness. That said, people have different expectations from a full-size laptop than from a Netbook-- so Netbook-like performance in a 15-inch body may feel even slower than it is.

Juice box
Compaq CQ62-215DX	Avg watts/hour
Off (60%)	0.36
Sleep (10%)	0.56
Idle (25%)	13.37
Load (05%)	37.62
Raw kWh Number	48.14
Annual power consumption cost	$5.46

The Compaq Presario CQ60-615DX uses a standard six-cell battery and lasted a disappointing 2 hours 31 minutes on CNET Labs' demanding video playback battery drain test. The Toshiba Satellite C665-S5049 lasted nearly an hour longer, running for 3 hours 25 minutes on the same test.

HP backs the Presario CQ62-215DX with an industry-standard, one-year warranty. Toll-free telephone support is available 24-7 during your warranty period, and the HP support Web site includes real-time chat with a technical support representative. If you want to troubleshoot problems yourself, you can search through the site's thorough FAQ database. Though retail shops are happy to sell you an in-store extended warranty, they are often expensive and hard to use, so we don't recommend them.

Find out more about how we test laptops.

System configurations:

Compaq Presario CQ62-215DX
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.19GHz AMD Sempron V120; 2048MB DDR3 SDRAM 1066MHz; 256MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250; 250GB Western Digital 5,400rpm

Asus K50IJ-BNC5
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.3GHz Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500; 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM 667MHz; 64MB (Dedicated)/1696MB (Total) Mobile Intel GMA 4500MHD; 500GB Western Digital 5,400rpm

Asus K50IJ-BBZ5
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.3GHz Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500; 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM 1066MHz; 64MB (Dedicated)/1696MB (Total) Mobile Intel GMA 4500MHD; 320GB Western Digital 5,400rpm

Dell iM501R-1212PBL
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.1GHz AMD Athlon II P320 Dual-Core; 3072MB DDR2 SDRAM 1333MHz; 384MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250; 320GB Toshiba 5,400rpm

HP G62-225DX
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.3GHz Intel Pentium Dual-Core T4500; 3072MB DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz; 64MB (Dedicated)/1696MB (Total) Mobile Intel GMA 4500MHD; 320GB Samsung 5,400rpm

HP Pavilion dv5-2035dx
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.29GHz AMD Turion II P520 Dual-Core; 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM 1066MHz; 320MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250; 320GB Seagate 5,400rpm

Toshiba Satellite C655-S5049
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.2GHz Intel Celeron 900; 2048MB DDR3 SDRAM 1066MHz; 128MB (Dedicated)/829MB (Total) Mobile Intel GMA 4500MHD; 250GB Toshiba 5,400rpm

Toshiba Satellite A665-S6050
Windows 7 Home Premium (64-bit); 2.27GHz Intel Core i3 M350; 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM 1066MHz; 64MB (Dedicated)/1696MB (Total) Intel GMA HD; 500GB Seagate 7,200rpm