The Corsair Neutron solid-state drive (SSD) is the budget version of the
It's not a perfect entry-level SSD, however, since, well, it's not as budget-friendly as other SSDs I've seen, especially its 120GB-capacity version, which costs about $130.
That said, pricing is the only thing that concerns me about the drive. Hopefully soon, like with other SSDs, the street price will get lower to make this truly the best budget SSD on the market. If you're not on a budget, I'd also recommend the Neutron GTX or any on this top-five list.
Design and features
|Drive type||7mm thick, 2.5-inch standard internal drive |
|Connector options||SATA 3 (6Gbps), SATA 2, SATA|
|Available capacities||120GB, 240GB|
|Product dimensions||7mm thick, 2.5-inch standard|
|Capacity of test unit||240GB|
|Integrated DRam Cache memory ||256MB of DDR2-800|
|Flash memory type ||Micron synchronous NAND|
|OSes supported||Windows, Mac, Linux|
Similar to the Corsair Neutron GTX, the Corsair Neutron comes in the 2.5-inch 7mm standard and sports the new LAMD LM87800 controller. The drive uses Micron's Synchronous NAND (as opposed to the high-performance Toggle Mode NAND from Toshiba), which is slated to offer slower performance at lower cost.
Like all 7mm-thick, 2.5-inch SSDs, the new Corsair Neutron can fit in the vast majority of systems, including the ultrathin laptops that won't work with regular 9.5mm-thick drives. The Corsair Neutron also comes with a 3.5-inch drive bay converter (and all necessary screws). This means it can also be easily used in a desktop system, just like any other 3.5-inch standard hard drive.
It's quite easy to upgrade your system's existing hard drive to the Corsair Neutron, as long as you get your own cloning software. In my testing the drive worked with all SATA standards, but if you want to get the most out of it, make sure you use it with a system that supports SATA 3 (6Gbps). The drive also works with all platforms I tried: Mac, Linux, and Windows.
Similar to the the Neutron GTX, the Neutron comes with an all-metal casing, which helps the drive feel solid and sturdy but doesn't offer anything in terms of looks. This is not a big deal for an internal drive, though. The drive also comes in a very small package that's just slightly larger than the included drive bay converter. I actually prefer this type of packaging; it produces very little trash.
Out of the box, the Neutron is not preformatted, so it will need to be formatted to work with a system. This is not a big task; it takes just about two or three minutes. For those who want to upgrade their system, this actually helps make the process faster since the cloning software doesn't need to delete the existing partition.
Cost per gigabyte
The new Corsair Neutron is noticeably more affordable than its big brother, the Corsair Neutron GTX, but not affordable enough compared with other SSDs. The drive's 240GB-capacity version currently costs about $214, effectively just about 89 cents per gigabyte, which is still slightly more expensive than the Samsung 830 Series, which is also much faster. The drive's 120GB version costs even more at $1.08 per gigabyte.
As I said earlier, though, the Corsair Neutron is relatively new on the market; SSD prices tend to get lower a few months after the release date.
The Corsair Neutron didn't perform as well as the Neutron GTX, but it wasn't that bad, either. The test machine, when using the new drive as its main storage, took about 12 seconds to boot and slightly more than 6 seconds to shut down. While these were very short times, they were actually among the longest for SSDs I've tested.
Nonetheless, applications took very little time to launch, especially when compared with a hard drive in the same setup. In fact, in real-world usage, you probably won't see any difference in application performance between the Neutron and the Neutron GTX.
In data copy tests (data copying isn't the primary use for SSDs, but it shows their performance most clearly), the Neutron did well. As with the previously reviewed SSDs, I tested the drive both when it was used as a secondary drive (and performed only the writing) and when it was used as the main drive of a computer (and performed both writing and reading at the same time). The latter is more representative of what customers will experience with the drive.
When the drive was used as a secondary drive, the Neutron hit 238MBps (compared with the Neutron GTX's 274MBps), among the top six on the charts. When used as the main drive of the test machine, it registered 138MBps; that's about average among the internal drives I've reviewed.
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|As Secondary drive||As OS drive|
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Fast and relatively affordable, the Corsair Neutron is another excellent SSD on the market, especially if its price gets a little friendlier in the near future.