Other features new to the nano include VoiceOver, which very effectively reads out menus and song titles to aid navigation for the visually impaired, as well as voice recording and playback, a pedometer that integrates with Nike +, and some attractive and well-designed games.
What you don't get is any multi-band EQ settings (you're still stuck with Apple's basic enhancement options), a microSD card slot for memory expansion, or support for offline playback ofcontent -- something that many UK MP3 players now offer. But there's one flaw that's more significant than all of these combined.
In the gravest oversight, the video camera
doesn't take still photographs -- it only records video. That's probably down to
issues with physically not being able to fit a decent-enough still image sensor into the body, but the result is an epic disappointment
Basic video quality
Once you discover your favourite way of avoiding obstructing the lens on the back, you can get some filming done. But you have no control over recording settings or quality. Everything is recorded at a 640x480-pixel resolution in H.264, at roughly 2.5Mbps. The data rate is variable, but these settings result in 1 minute of footage consuming about 20MB of memory, or around 1.2GB per hour. That's actually pretty good.
The problem, dearest consumer, is that the lens is so small and the microphone so tiny that camcorders, although it is on a par with that of a very good camera phone. Admittedly, the nano is perfect for capturing quick clips of friends falling into waste compacters or cats doing something hilarious with a baby, and its video is in the perfect format for sharing on YouTube or Facebook. But, if you're planning on filming your holidays around the Caribbean, we'd strongly advise against using the nano as your primary video-capture device. For one thing, colours can look washed-out during outdoor filming.is absolutely no replacement for that of even the most basic of
As for sound quality, if you only use the cheap little earbuds that Apple provides in the box, there's not really any audible difference between this and other players. Those headphones are, as you should know, abysmal. But, if you plug in even a half-decent pair -- perhaps the or the high-end -- the nano delivers good sound quality. Sony's Walkman line offers more powerful, bass-packed audio, but, for the vast majority of people, the nano's sound quality will be perfectly good enough.
In terms of watching video, the nano doesn't compare to the iPod touch (or, of course, a TV). But, for its size and the cost of the device it sits inside, the nano's screen delivers excellent video quality. A tight pixel density produces crisp images, and a handy internal speaker will come in useful for watching a TV show or video podcast in bed. Be warned though: the speaker breathes new vigour into the word 'atrocious' when it comes to music -- it's just too small.
Without question, the fifth-generation model is Apple's best iPod nano yet, and the 16GB version is exceptionally good value. That's not to say this nano is perfect though, and, unless you badly want a video camera, there's no reason to upgrade from the previous model. Overall, it's even more feature-packed than its predecessors, yet leaves intact the spot-on functionality that we've always adored.
Edited by Charles Kloet