The Good The Panasonic TC-PST60 series has a reasonable price, incredibly good picture quality with exceedingly deep black levels, great shadow detail, accurate colors, solid bright-room performance, and superb off-angle and uniformity characteristics; it also features sleek styling with metal accents, offers plenty of Smart TV content, and includes two pairs of 3D glasses.
The Bad Worse 3D quality than many competing TVs; not as suited to extremely bright rooms as some LCD models; consumes more power than LCD TVs; introduces significant input lag.
The Bottom Line The midlevel price and outstanding quality of the Panasonic TC-PST60 series make it our strongest TV recommendation ever.
Affordable TV with amazing picture quality
I've written TV reviews for more than 10 years, but I'm pretty sure this one is the most important. I'll cut to the chase: if you value picture quality, don't have money to burn, and don't game seriously enough to worry about, you should buy the Panasonic TC-PST60.
Yes, it's a very little reason not to get a plasma TV. Once you decide to go plasma -- don't worry, you'll be fine -- the next question is which one. That's what makes the ST60 so important. It's Panasonic's least expensive 2013 TV set to boast this extremely high level of picture quality, and Panasonic is the only TV manufacturer even trying to make premium-performing TVs affordable these days. Given the company's financial trouble, .. That's the main reason why its picture is so good. And despite what you may have heard, there's
Yes, I expect a few TVs to deliver an even better picture than the ST60 this year, but they'll all cost a lot more. And yes, a couple of cheaper 2013 TVs, in particular Panasonic's own S60 series, might perform well enough to earn an "excellent" picture quality score from us. But I'll be extremely surprised if any 2013 TV surpasses the ST60's combination of jaw-dropping performance and practical affordability.
TVs are only getting brighter, but how much light is enough?
Recent prototype TVs with high dynamic range can get 15 times brighter than yours. Will you need sunglasses to watch them?
Aren't TV OLED and phone OLED the same thing?
Gorgeous OLED screens come in sizes fit for your hand and your living room wall. Here's how they compare.
CES TVs preview: What to expect from the big screens of 2018
From OLED to QLED to Micro LED, CES is the place where screen time is absolutely friggin' huge. Here's a peek.
Back in time, when TVs were really expensive
Beyond the Black Friday deals and disposably cheap TVs, are televisions getting more or less expensive? Let's find out.
Time for an upgrade? HDR10+, the latest HDR format
There’s a new high dynamic range format coming. It’s called HDR10+. Here’s what you need to know.
HDR format explainer: HDR10 vs. Dolby Vision vs. HLG
There are three HDR formats and your TV might not be able to play content from all of them. Here’s how they stack up.
Samsung QLED vs. LG OLED TV: What's the difference?
Samsung's QLED TVs aim squarely at LG's OLED models for the picture quality crown. But in spite of the similar-sounding names, they're as different as chalk and cheese.
Sony prices XBR-A1E OLED TV higher than LG, starting at $5,000
After LG, Sony is the second major TV maker to sell OLED TVs in the US this year, starting in April. They'll be a lot more expensive though.
I still watch my plasma TV, even though my OLED is better
With both TVs in the house I can see the difference, but it's not noticeable enough that I need to junk my plasma before it dies.
Curved TV isn't dead yet. Thanks, Samsung.
Last year sales of curved TVs actually rose, but without LG in the mix will their popularity flatline?
Sony OLED TV coming next year for $2,000 and up, according to report
Rumor has it that Sony will sell a TV based on OLED display technology, competing against LG for the best image quality available.
Should I get a new 4K TV?
Not sure if you should upgrade to a new Ultra HD "4K" TV? Here's a handy guide to figure it out.