/> ED I T O R S C H O I C E IN N O V A T IO N A W A R D
X

Nikon Coolpix A photo samples (pictures)

The camera delivers great photo quality, concomitant with its price tag.

LoriGruninNewHeadshot.jpg
Lori Grunin
35626828_SIC1_620.jpg
1 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Noise and JPEG processing

JPEGs look very clean up through ISO 800, and there's a noticeable sharpness difference between ISO 800 and ISO 1600. ISO 3200 is usable, but I wouldn't recommend going higher than that unless you're willing to make some compromises.
35626828_SIC5_620-100.jpg
2 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 100

Images have an impressive, natural sharpness and hold up surprisingly well compared with those of the Fujifilm X-Trans sensor.
(1/100 sec, f11, ISO 100, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC4_620-bokeh.jpg
3 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Bokeh

The slighly polygonal out-of-focus highlights when stopped down a bit are the results of the lens' seven-bladed aperture; it's nice at f2.8. If you're picky about your bokeh, though, eight blades or more is better.
(1/250 sec, f4.5, ISO 100, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC11_620-higlights.jpg
4 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Highlight recovery

I had mixed results with highlight latitude on the Coolpix A. I couldn't recover any detail from the blown-out areas on the image on the left, but fared pretty well with the tablecloths on the right image. It performed well with shadow detail recovery.
35626828_SIC6_620-400.jpg
5 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 400 JPEG

The camera delivers very nice, clean detail at ISO 400.
(1/60 sec, f3.5, ISO 400, spot metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC7_620-800.jpg
6 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 800

Photos look artifact-free as high as ISO 800.
(1/30 sec, f5, ISO 800, spot metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC8_620-1600.jpg
7 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 1600 JPEG

I start to see some noise suppression artifacts in JPEGs at ISO 1600, but it's not bad in brighter areas. I did get better results with raw at this setting.
(1/60 sec, f5, ISO 1600, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC8_620-3200rj.jpg
8 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 3200 raw vs. JPEG

Shooting raw for ISO 3200 delivers much better results than JPEG, and the camera fares pretty well at this setting. This is as high as I'd go, though.
(1/60 sec, f3.2, ISO 3200, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC9_620-6400rj.jpg
9 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

ISO 6400 raw vs. JPEG

You can get usable results at ISO 6400 if you shoot raw, but not without considerable graininess.
(1/60 sec, f5, ISO 6400, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC2_620-color.jpg
10 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Color

The camera renders colors pretty accurately.
35626828_SIC3_620-colorPS.jpg
11 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Standard vs. Neutral Picture Control

The default Standard Picture Control seems to push contrast more than saturation, so there's no significant hue shift but some loss of shadow detail. The Neutral setting doesn't look too flat, though, which is nice.
(1/640 sec, f3.5, ISO 100, matrix metering, AWB)
35626828_SIC10_620-red.jpg
12 of 12 Lori Grunin/CNET

Bright, saturated colors

The camera handles out-of-gamut colors and intensities reasonably well.
(1/200 sec, f5.6, ISO 100, matrix metering, AWB)

More Galleries

The best games on Nintendo Switch

More Galleries

The best games on Nintendo Switch

41 Photos
The best Christmas movies and where to watch them

More Galleries

The best Christmas movies and where to watch them

18 Photos
Movies coming in 2021 and 2022 from Netflix, Marvel, HBO and more

More Galleries

Movies coming in 2021 and 2022 from Netflix, Marvel, HBO and more

67 Photos
2021 best new TV shows to watch, stream, obsess about

More Galleries

2021 best new TV shows to watch, stream, obsess about

65 Photos
The new Genesis G90 looks incredible

More Galleries

The new Genesis G90 looks incredible

6 Photos
The 51 best VR games

More Galleries

The 51 best VR games

53 Photos
Best dating apps of 2021

More Galleries

Best dating apps of 2021

13 Photos