Year in review: Oracle's merger madness
In the hunt for PeopleSoft, Oracle keeps up the chase.
Oracle v. PeopleSoft: Merger madness
You wouldn't find more plot twists if you looked in a John Grisham novel.
Oracle's hostile bid to acquire PeopleSoft has kept investors, customers, analysts and scribes speculating and second-guessing, ever since the saga began in June.
Is Oracle serious about buying PeopleSoft? Or is its $7.25 billion bid merely a clever scheme to damage a growing rival? Will antitrust regulators give Oracle the green light? Or put a kibosh on the deal? Will Oracle raise its bid again? And how much is it willing to pay?
The ongoing battle has also raised deeper questions about the business software market and whether it's undergoing a fundamental shift toward fewer, more powerful competitors.
So far, answers have been slow in coming. At this point, Oracle appears genuinely intent on acquiring PeopleSoft. The antitrust question should be resolved in January, when the U.S. Department of Justice and the European Commission are expected to issue their decisions on the deal.
After that, the plot gets a little murky. Oracle says it's ready to wage a proxy fight and plans to nominate replacements for four PeopleSoft board seats in January, in advance of a spring election. But even if shareholders elect Oracle's slate, Oracle won't have majority control over the eight-seat board. Oracle also has to contend with a poison pill, a lawsuit charging it with unfair trade practices, and a coalition of 30 states poised to challenge the deal, if the Justice Department doesn't.
And like any good drama, this one has a host of colorful characters and subplots. There's the Morgan Stanley star analyst turned Oracle acquisitions mastermind, Chuck Phillips. Oracle Chief Executive Larry Ellison, everybody's favorite antagonist, has done his part to keep up the bad-guy image. Ellison said in initial interviews that he intended to shut down PeopleSoft and later joked about saving a bullet for PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway. The bad blood between the rival chiefs actually goes back 10 years, when Conway, a former Oracle executive, was reportedly ousted from the company in a power struggle.
The town of Pleasanton, Calif., home to PeopleSoft headquarters, even took a stand against Oracle, which is based across the bay in Redwood Shores. In July, local businesses hung anti-Oracle signs in their windows, and the mayor of Pleasanton hit the streets in a Just Say No to Oracle campaign, led by PeopleSoft employees.
If nothing else, the Oracle-PeopleSoft brawl has provided some with a welcome distraction from the gloominess of the post-tulipomania information technology industry, still struggling to emerge from a three-year funk. The war in Iraq stalled business spending and didn't help matters.
Meanwhile, a widely circulated Harvard Business Review article bruised many an ego, proclaiming that IT just didn't matter anymore. But if there's one thing to count on, it's that Oracle always finds a way to keep things interesting.
--Alorie Gilbert
PeopleSoft calls Oracle bid 'atrocious'
Oracle announces a surprise $5.1 billion takeover bid for the enterprise software maker, just days after PeopleSoft said it was acquiring rival J.D. Edwards for $1.7 billion.June 6, 2003
PeopleSoft formally rejects Oracle bid
The software maker's board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders reject Oracle's takeover offer and reaffirms its commitment to the J.D. Edwards deal.June 12, 2003
Oracle ups its PeopleSoft offer
The software maker raises its takeover bid for PeopleSoft to $19.50 per share and files a lawsuit against PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards.June 18, 2003
PeopleSoft rejects new Oracle bid
The software maker's board of directors once again spurns Oracle's attempt to buy the company, saying that even though the price is higher, it's still not enough.June 20, 2003
Justice Dept. wants more from Oracle
The software maker gets a second request for information from federal regulators looking for antitrust red flags in Oracle's hostile bid for rival PeopleSoft.June 30, 2003
States prep Oracle-PeopleSoft review
Attorneys general from approximately 30 states intensify their review of Oracle's $6.3 billion unsolicited bid for PeopleSoft.July 10, 2003
People power to derail Oracle plans?
The company's biggest obstacle to acquiring PeopleSoft may be thousands of customers who fear their multimillion-dollar software investments are in jeopardy.July 10, 2003
PeopleSoft bid a sign of weakness for Oracle
Oracle's attempt at a hostile takeover of its rival is yet more evidence of the database giant's struggles to find solid footing in the applications marketplace.July 11, 2003
PeopleSoft details layoff, product plans
The company fills in analysts on its plans to digest J.D. Edwards, confirming its intention to lay off up to 1,000 workers while keeping the J.D. Edwards product line intact.Sept. 4, 2003
EU seeks longer review of Oracle deal
European antitrust regulators announce that they're extending their review of Oracle's hostile bid for PeopleSoft into an in-depth second phase.Nov. 17, 2003
PeopleSoft extends customer refund program
In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the maker of enterprise business applications says it will extend its controversial program until the end of the year.Nov. 19, 2003
Oracle says it still wants PeopleSoft
The company remains committed to its merger bid despite a number of obstacles. One action it plans to take is to nominate an alternative slate of directors for PeopleSoft's board.Nov. 24, 2003
Oracle steps closer to PeopleSoft ruling
The company meets a Justice Department request for information on its multibillion-dollar bid for PeopleSoft, clearing the way for a ruling on whether the deal is anticompetitive.Dec. 19, 2003
Oracle v. PeopleSoft: Merger madness
You wouldn't find more plot twists if you looked in a John Grisham novel.
Oracle's hostile bid to acquire PeopleSoft has kept investors, customers, analysts and scribes speculating and second-guessing, ever since the saga began in June.
Is Oracle serious about buying PeopleSoft? Or is its $7.25 billion bid merely a clever scheme to damage a growing rival? Will antitrust regulators give Oracle the green light? Or put a kibosh on the deal? Will Oracle raise its bid again? And how much is it willing to pay?
The ongoing battle has also raised deeper questions about the business software market and whether it's undergoing a fundamental shift toward fewer, more powerful competitors.
So far, answers have been slow in coming. At this point, Oracle appears genuinely intent on acquiring PeopleSoft. The antitrust question should be resolved in January, when the U.S. Department of Justice and the European Commission are expected to issue their decisions on the deal.
After that, the plot gets a little murky. Oracle says it's ready to wage a proxy fight and plans to nominate replacements for four PeopleSoft board seats in January, in advance of a spring election. But even if shareholders elect Oracle's slate, Oracle won't have majority control over the eight-seat board. Oracle also has to contend with a poison pill, a lawsuit charging it with unfair trade practices, and a coalition of 30 states poised to challenge the deal, if the Justice Department doesn't.
And like any good drama, this one has a host of colorful characters and subplots. There's the Morgan Stanley star analyst turned Oracle acquisitions mastermind, Chuck Phillips. Oracle Chief Executive Larry Ellison, everybody's favorite antagonist, has done his part to keep up the bad-guy image. Ellison said in initial interviews that he intended to shut down PeopleSoft and later joked about saving a bullet for PeopleSoft CEO Craig Conway. The bad blood between the rival chiefs actually goes back 10 years, when Conway, a former Oracle executive, was reportedly ousted from the company in a power struggle.
The town of Pleasanton, Calif., home to PeopleSoft headquarters, even took a stand against Oracle, which is based across the bay in Redwood Shores. In July, local businesses hung anti-Oracle signs in their windows, and the mayor of Pleasanton hit the streets in a Just Say No to Oracle campaign, led by PeopleSoft employees.
If nothing else, the Oracle-PeopleSoft brawl has provided some with a welcome distraction from the gloominess of the post-tulipomania information technology industry, still struggling to emerge from a three-year funk. The war in Iraq stalled business spending and didn't help matters.
Meanwhile, a widely circulated Harvard Business Review article bruised many an ego, proclaiming that IT just didn't matter anymore. But if there's one thing to count on, it's that Oracle always finds a way to keep things interesting.
--Alorie Gilbert
PeopleSoft calls Oracle bid 'atrocious'
Oracle announces a surprise $5.1 billion takeover bid for the enterprise software maker, just days after PeopleSoft said it was acquiring rival J.D. Edwards for $1.7 billion.June 6, 2003
PeopleSoft formally rejects Oracle bid
The software maker's board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders reject Oracle's takeover offer and reaffirms its commitment to the J.D. Edwards deal.June 12, 2003
Oracle ups its PeopleSoft offer
The software maker raises its takeover bid for PeopleSoft to $19.50 per share and files a lawsuit against PeopleSoft and J.D. Edwards.June 18, 2003
PeopleSoft rejects new Oracle bid
The software maker's board of directors once again spurns Oracle's attempt to buy the company, saying that even though the price is higher, it's still not enough.June 20, 2003
Justice Dept. wants more from Oracle
The software maker gets a second request for information from federal regulators looking for antitrust red flags in Oracle's hostile bid for rival PeopleSoft.June 30, 2003
States prep Oracle-PeopleSoft review
Attorneys general from approximately 30 states intensify their review of Oracle's $6.3 billion unsolicited bid for PeopleSoft.July 10, 2003
People power to derail Oracle plans?
The company's biggest obstacle to acquiring PeopleSoft may be thousands of customers who fear their multimillion-dollar software investments are in jeopardy.July 10, 2003
PeopleSoft bid a sign of weakness for Oracle
Oracle's attempt at a hostile takeover of its rival is yet more evidence of the database giant's struggles to find solid footing in the applications marketplace.July 11, 2003
PeopleSoft details layoff, product plans
The company fills in analysts on its plans to digest J.D. Edwards, confirming its intention to lay off up to 1,000 workers while keeping the J.D. Edwards product line intact.Sept. 4, 2003
EU seeks longer review of Oracle deal
European antitrust regulators announce that they're extending their review of Oracle's hostile bid for PeopleSoft into an in-depth second phase.Nov. 17, 2003
PeopleSoft extends customer refund program
In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the maker of enterprise business applications says it will extend its controversial program until the end of the year.Nov. 19, 2003
Oracle says it still wants PeopleSoft
The company remains committed to its merger bid despite a number of obstacles. One action it plans to take is to nominate an alternative slate of directors for PeopleSoft's board.Nov. 24, 2003
Oracle steps closer to PeopleSoft ruling
The company meets a Justice Department request for information on its multibillion-dollar bid for PeopleSoft, clearing the way for a ruling on whether the deal is anticompetitive.Dec. 19, 2003