X

Would you eat a 3D-printed burger?

We can already use a process called bioprinting to create organic tissue — now, a start-up is applying the process to making artificial meat.

Michelle Starr Science editor
Michelle Starr is CNET's science editor, and she hopes to get you as enthralled with the wonders of the universe as she is. When she's not daydreaming about flying through space, she's daydreaming about bats.
Michelle Starr
2 min read

(Cheeseburger image by the National Cancer Institute, public domain)

We can already use a process called bioprinting to create organic tissue — now, a start-up is applying the process to making artificial meat.

If we can have 3D-printed organs for medical purposes, why not a 3D-printed burger?

A company called Modern Meadow in the US is trialling just that. According to its website, there are numerous problems with meat production: the greenhouse gases created by livestock, the land and resources required, the wastage in meat production and the increasing population. By 2050, Modern Meadow asserts, 70 per cent more meat will be required to feed the world.

To address these issues, the company is using a process called bioprinting to experiment with lab-created meat.

Using live stem cells taken from animals, Modern Meadow creates a substance it calls "bioink" (it's a portmanteau of "bio" and "ink", but we initially read an "oink" in there). These living cells are then printed into agarose moulds.

After a few days, the bioink has fused enough to hold a shape; this living piece of tissue can then be placed into a bioreactor, where muscle growth is stimulated using a low-frequency current.

Eventually, the tissue will be killed off so it can be used as meat.

At the moment, it's a pretty expensive process — but one that Modern Meadow hopes will revolutionise food production in the years ahead. According to its website, the benefits of bio-engineering meat include:

  • 99 per cent less land required

  • 96 per cent less water consumed

  • 96 per cent fewer greenhouse gases emitted

  • 45 per cent less energy needed

  • No risk of livestock diseases

  • No animals harmed.

Sounds much more animal and environmentally friendly than the spherical cow.

Via www.bbc.co.uk