Yesterday's announcement in Redmond that Windows 98, Microsoft's (MSFT) next iteration of the Windows operating system, won't be out until the first quarter of 1998 elicited reactions ranging all the way from nonchalance to very mild indifference.
This comes against a backdrop
The long view
|Gates, Ballmer tout corporate strategy|
|Vendors unfazed by OS delay|
|MS: Windows 98 no blockbuster update|
|Memphis is Windows 98|
|Microsoft jabs Java|
|Looking to the year 2000|
Microsoft officials denied that it gave the dates to the newsletter's publishers and called the information "inaccurate."
It appears, however, that some in the PC industry have already taken the later 1998 introduction into account.
"Even if it's on the shelf for the Christmas season, there won't be enough machines with it to change the competitive situation."
Microsoft vice president Paul Maritz indirectly confirmed the delay when he referred to the OS as "Windows 98" in a press conference in Redmond, Washington, yesterday. Jim Allchin, senior vice president of Microsoft's personal systems and business group, separately said that Windows 98 will ship in the first quarter of next year.
The new version of Windows, which integrates Internet Explorer 4.0 and other Web-centric features into the operating system, has already become a 1998 item for many in the PC industry, including the corporate market.
The news of the delay created little excitement in the corporate market. Most corporate customers are still trying to absorb Windows 95 or have decided to move toward NT Workstation 5.0 as their operating system of choice. As a result, Windows 98 has yet to draw interest.
"Most of my customers have 2,000 seat installations or so. They will probably wait at least a year after the software is out before trying it," said Kanan Hamzeh, general manager of Tri-Pole MicroAge, in Fountain Valley, California.
Hamzeh added that many customers are just completing the transition to Windows 95. As an aside, he speculated that the potential upgrade to Windows 98 will be easier than the shift to Windows 95 because the overall differences in the operating systems are less extreme.
"It's not an issue for us," said Rand Morimoto, general manager of Inacom, in Oakland, California. "Most of our customers are moving to NT Workstation 5.0. It's more stable in the sense that Windows 95 is becoming Windows 98 while NT will be NT."
"The delay in Memphis is far less critical for us than a delay in NT 5.0," said Larry Sennett, a corporate spokesperson for HP's business unit.
A new beta of NT Workstation 5.0 will ship in September, said Microsoft. The final product is due in the first half of 1998, said sources.