X

Tech industry trends we're over: 'Smart' electronics

The definition of the terms "smart" and "intelligent" when applied to electronics is expanding so rapidly that the terms have become almost entirely meaningless.

Andrew Nusca Special to CNET News
Andrew Nusca is the editor of SmartPlanet and an associate editor at ZDNet. He has written for New York, Men's Vogue, Popular Mechanics, and Money. He is based in New York.
Andrew Nusca
2 min read
At CES, Liu Jun, senior vice president of Lenovo's Mobile Internet and Digital Home Business Group, shows off what the company calls a smart TV. Corinne Schulze

LAS VEGAS--We all want a peek at the future of electronics, and we all like to think that it's just around the corner. Often, it is. But let's not get past ourselves.

If there's one trend we've had enough of here at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show, it's the "smart" product. Manufacturers can't help but throw the term around to describe virtually any electronic device that can transfer data to another. They also can't resist using the term to describe an improved user experience or new operating system.

I'm here to tell you that's hogwash.

Listen, I'm no ideologue about using the terms "smart" and "intelligent." The geekiest among us might protest that the terms should be reserved only for true artificial intelligence, and they're right. But the reality is that the average consumer needs to be able to relate to products, and without an everyday term like "smart" or "intelligent," those products just won't resonate with them as effectively.

So I'm in the camp where "smart" and "intelligent" can be applied to devices and systems that use real-time telecommunications data to gain insights to change behavior. The "smart" power grid? Good. An "intelligent" telematics system that learns a driver's preferences over time? Fine.

An easier-to-use operating system interface? Not a chance.

Here's a smattering of headlines from CES this week about "smart" products:

  • Smart TVs Abound at CES, but Ecosystems Are Destined for War (Wired)
  • Smart appliances can cause privacy concerns (Washington Post)
  • The CES smart phones: Big, fast and better cameras (San Francisco Chronicle)
  • Withings introduces the smart baby scale; ready to keep the world posted on your baby's growth (MedGadget)
  • A smart outlet with some oomph (CNET)
  • Samsung boost smart camera line-up with WB850F, DV300F and ST200F models (TechDigest)

As you can see, the definition is fuzzy. Some of these products use sensors to understand their environment; some merely transmit data; others are obviously being hyped with marketing gobbledygook.

I'm not trying to split hairs on semantics; my real concern is that the definition of these terms is expanding so rapidly that the terms have become almost entirely meaningless. For example, if "smart" merely means Internet-connected, well, most of the products on the CES show floor fit the bill. But if it means gathering data from the outside--and better yet, acting on that insight--well, that's a far more exclusive circle.

There may not be a big takeaway theme for CES 2012, but each successive show takes another step toward devices that go far beyond basic computational tasks. As everything from shoes to supercars adds a dash of Internet connectivity, we're going to need terms to distinguish between them. Because as with any trade show, there are a lot of intelligent products on display--but a lot of dumb ones, too.

This story originally appeared on ZDNet's SmartPlanet.