We think of ourselves as evolved creatures. It's just that sometimes we forget how slow that evolution is.
Along comes Stephen Hawking to remind us that artificial intelligence might just evolve a little quicker than we're prone to. The result could be the end of our evolution and, indeed, the end of us.
In a BBC interview published Tuesday, Hawking paints a picture of humanity not dissimilar to a splattered Jackson Pollock.
Hawking said he fears that a complete artificial intelligence would simply do away with us.
AI "would take off on its own, and redesign itself at an ever increasing rate," he mused. The result would quite simply be that this new, exalted intelligence would see no need for our cumbersome, turgid ways. Or, as he put it: "Humans, who are limited by slow biological evolution, couldn't compete, and would be superseded."
This isn't the first time in recent months that Hawking has predicted our doom. In May, hethat the moral goodness of AI depends on who controls it. In June, that robots might simply turn out to be smarter than us.
In the latest warning, however, Hawking was asked about the new artificial intelligence that helps him speak., it learns how he thinks and begins to offer words that he might wish to use. Somehow, though, Hawking still couldn't offer a more positive view of AI's future (or ours).
It's not so easy to find much optimism in some of Hawking's more recent thoughts. Yes,But before our human-built robots will, simply because they'll take a look at us and rather dislike us.
At heart it seems that for all the progress made with respect to the God Particle, for instance, Hawking worries that we're likely to be terminated. Indeed, in Septemberthat the God Particle itself might become unstable and cause a "catastrophic vacuum decay."
It's tempting to be like Googlies, who seems to believe that any amount of engineering development must be a good thing.
But with Hawking giving such consistently dire warnings, it may be wise to contemplate how we might control the uncontrollable when some bright minds believe, for example, that cars should drive us, rather than the other way around.
On a more personal note, Hawking told the BBC that despite technological advances, he wants to carry on speaking in the somewhat robotic manner of his previous technology.
"It has become my trademark, and I wouldn't change it for a more natural voice with a British accent," he said.
However playful Hawking can be, though, one is left with his essentially pessimistic view of the future. He isn't alone either. Elon Musk, a founder of Tesla Motors and SpaceX, has likewise. And how many sci-fi movies have painted a beautiful, future world? And how many have offered something a little more frightening?