CNET también está disponible en español.

Ir a español

Don't show this again


So, if open source says it, it's not FUD?

Open source spreads FUD, too, doesn't it?

I will admit it: I think Microsoft and other proprietary companies are often guilty of spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) about open source. Microsoft did it recently with its "number-crunching" on Firefox security and on Linux security. To me it's clear: proprietary software companies feel threatened by open source and react with FUD.

But is the inverse also true? Do open-source companies/projects/developers do the same thing about Microsoft and other proprietary companies? Of course they/we do. Some of it may well be based on good information and given for good reasons, but I'm not sure the open-source world has cornered the market on good intentions. Somehow it's considered OK to FUD one way but not the other.

A double standard? Thoughts?