San Diego-based chipmaker Qualcomm, which owns about 20 percent of the patents on the(wideband-code division multiple access) standard, hasn't yet indicated whether it will endorse a fee plan floated by rival Nokia and a group of other companies.
Handset makers Nokia, Ericsson and Siemens, along with Japanese mobile communications company NTT DoCoMo, own at least 60 percent of W-CDMA patents. The companies all agreed not to charge makers of cell phones and cell phone network equipment more than 5 percent royalties to use any of the various patented W-CDMA techniques.
W-CDMA doubles the calling capacity of any cell phone network and creates a wireless Web with download speeds of up to 364kbps. It's expected to dominate the world's cellular stage because any carrier, regardless of what kind of network it operates, can upgrade to the standard without building a new network. That's a benefit no other standard, such as GPRS (General Packet Radio Service), can offer.
NTT has the world's only working W-CDMA network, but most other carriers are expected to finish upgrading by 2005. U.S. carriers planning to move to the standard, which is also known as UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunications System), include AT&T Wireless.
Bill Plummer, Nokia's vice president of strategic and external affairs, said equipment makers Fujitsu, Matsushita Communication Industrial, Mitsubishi Electric, NEC and Sony have "expressed their willingness to cooperate" with the 5 percent fee cap.
"We are supporting what we think are modest rates on a global basis," Plummer said.
A Qualcomm representative did not immediately return a phone call seeking comment on whether the company plans to endorse the cap. Qualcomm owns about 20 percent of the W-CDMA patents, according to Shiv Bakhshi, a wireless analyst with IDC.
Qualcomm has a tough decision to make. On the one hand, the 5 percent cap could help keep down costs for phone and network makers, ensuring attractively low prices on W-CDMA handset and infrastructure equipment.
On the other hand, Qualcomm makes nearly all its revenues from licensing intellectual property to equipment makers; it might not want to set a limit on how much it can charge for its products, Bakhshi said.
By comparison, other W-CDMA patent holders, including those agreeing to the cap, also get revenue by manufacturing and selling phones and phone networking gear. That makes them less hesitant to set a cap, Bakhshi said.
"If patents is all you have, why would you cap it?" Bakhshi said.