Bottom line: For more info:
Microsoft has backed away from many of the more grandiose uses once envisioned for Passport, its online identification system.
While the software will still be inserted into Microsoft's Internet infrastructure, broader plans to manage identity information are being deferred to Longhorn, the next version of the Windows operating system.
Track the players
For more info:
The reality has turned out to be considerably less expansive. Passport use is limited to Microsoft-owned sites and a handful of close partners, thanks to a combination of customer apathy, high-profile Microsoft glitches and credible competition from the.
Analysts now say Passport is likely to become little more than part of Microsoft's Internet infrastructure over the next year, with broader plans to manage identity information now deferred to, the next version of the Windows operating system.
"There doesn't seem to be a huge role for Passport--certainly not the role that was sketched out for it two or three years ago," said Matt Rosoff, an analyst for research firm Directions on Microsoft. "I expect at some point, Microsoft is going to say Passport is for Microsoft sites and close partners and leave it at that."
"The market largely rejected a proprietary, tied-to-Microsoft approach," Gartner analyst John Pescatore said. "We've actually seen the Liberty Alliance keep moving forward and get some traction in a variety of places, where Passport has pretty much remained a Microsoft, under-the-covers thing."
Microsoft representatives declined repeated requests to comment for this story. "There's nothing new to talk about," one representative said, while insisting that Microsoft remains committed to Passport.
Aside from dealing with, Microsoft executives have not spoken about Passport for months.
The software maker acquired the technology for Passport when itin April 1998. It relaunched the service a year later .
Passport authentication was built into Microsoft Web services such as its Hotmail e-mail service and The Zone gaming site, and the company unveiled plans to resell Passport services to other sites as part of a.
A few years later, only a few major sites support Passport sign-in as an option. The only sign of Passport at auction site eBay, touted as an initial backer of the service, is hidden deep within a customer support index.
The tepid reception for Passport stemmed from a number of causes, analysts said, beginning with a lack of customer interest. The big promise of Passport was that it would simplify shopping by allowing folks to use the same sign-on for multiple shopping sites. But when was the last time you chose an online merchant based on their authentication procedure?
"Microsoft was kind of pushing Passport for a problem that didn't exist," Pescatore said. "There just aren't a lot of natural economies where there are going to be benefits to the consumer to have single sign-on. If I'm on eBay, am I really going to go straight to United (Air Lines) to buy plane tickets? Consumers didn't see the benefit, and businesses aren't going to sink any money into it until they see how it's going to increase revenue."
Any efforts by Microsoft to convince customers that single sign-on was a big deal were undermined by a string of embarrassing glitches. Problems with Passport servers have resulted in. A put personal data and credit card information for thousands of customers at risk of being hijacked. And Microsoft endured a that put significant restrictions on what data Microsoft can collect.
The upshot was that even businesses that were interested in simplifying their sign-on processes didn't get too excited about the idea of putting everything on a Microsoft server.
"It's not isolated to just issues with Passport security but (is related to) Microsoft's record in the large," said Gerry Gebel, an analyst for research firm The Burton Group. "Businesses like to maintain their autonomy, and they became especially concerned about leaving everything to Microsoft."
"It proved to be far more complicated than Microsoft imagined," Rosoff noted. "Passport became this poisoned service under a lot of scrutiny from regulators." All the restrictions, combined with lack of interest from third-party vendors, suggest that, within the next year or so, "they're going to scale it way back," he said. "I can't imagine a Web site today being willing to pay $10,000 a year and go through the whole process necessary to implement Passport."
Challenge from Liberty
Doubts about Microsoft's ability to run a centralized authentication system made it all the more appealing when a viable alternative emerged. The Liberty Alliance, and backed by a number of major players, , was formed to create standards for a "federated" identity service, in which data could be securely shared among e-commerce sites without the need for a central broker.
The group recently releasedand now has 31 companies shipping or working on products that support the standards, said Simon Nicholson, the chair of the business and marketing expert group at the Liberty Alliance.
"Certainly the market has spoken very clearly to say the technology we deploy must be based on open standards...and there will be no central repository of identity data; it will be a federated model," he said.
The primary selling points of the Liberty Alliance model, Nicholson said, have been that it works with a shopping site's existing technology and that it doesn't insert an outside company into the transaction process.
"Businesses have these relationships that have taken a while to mature, and they don't want to see another brand trying to insert themselves between them and their customers," he said.
Analyst Pescatore said Microsoft had erred by making its initial Passport plans too intrusive and far-reaching. "Their original architecture was pretty much that Microsoft was always in the loop; they weren't just selling you a piece of software," he said. "Then they talked about this more federated architecture, where you could put up your own Passport server, but by then it was too late."
Credit card companies and other infrastructure players were satisfied to wait for Liberty Alliance plans to coalesce. "The fact that Liberty Alliance was moving a little slow wasn't a problem, because banking and finance had no plans to use a federated identity service anytime soon," Pescatore said. "Liberty was going to base their architecture on a standard that was already in the marketplace, and that sounded good to them."
Problems with Passport coincided with waning interest at Microsoft in becoming a services company. The past few years have seen the company ditch most of the grander plans lumped under the .Net banner, which originally stood for turning software into a Web-delivered service. Instead, Microsoft isto address the services market.
"I really think they're just not interested anymore in running hosted services, except in situations where they think it's going to help them sell software," Rosoff said. "They've already suffered the PR fallout from, and (Passport) is really the last shoe to drop."
However, Passport will continue to run on Microsoft sites, Rosoff said, and parts of the service will likely show up in future technologies.
"I think Microsoft will be evolving the technology, and maybe we'll see it in future releases," Gebel said. "If you look at Longhorn and (its Web services technology)in particular...they are certainly baking more of the Web services framework into the platform. You'll see different forms of federation there."
Pescatore said Passport especially makes sense for Microsoft's Smartphone platform for mobile phones, where the convenience of a single sign-on would be valuable. Just don't expect a repeat of the hoopla that accompanied Passport's arrival.
"Passport is not dead or dormant," he said. "It is just at a stage of, 'Let's get it out there first and then start preaching the value of it.'"