There's a ruckus in the tech world over encrypting mobile devices. No, it's not about Apple's battle to protect user data. This time, it's Amazon's decision not to.
The news landed like a record scratch Thursday, when security industry heavyweights gathered at the RSA conference in San Francisco heard Amazon plans to stop protecting the data customers store on its tablets and other devices with a technology called encryption.
The change might have merely brought about head scratching and odd looks any other day, but the past couple of weeks, encryption has been front and center as Apple slugs it out with the US government on the front pages of the world's newspapers.
The battle is whether Apple should help the FBI hack into an encrypted phone. Apple says if it's forced to help the FBI, the resulting methods will weaken the more than 1 billion iPhones and iPads used around the world.
Simply put, Amazon's choice flies in the face of security fundamentals, experts at the RSA conference said.
James Carder, an executive at cybersecurity LogRhythm, said Amazon just lost a customer, particularly for its newly updated voice controlled device called the Amazon Echo. "I'm not buying it," he said, adding the company's move makes hackers' work far easier.
An Amazon spokeswoman said the company removed some business-oriented features from its devices "that we found customers weren't using." Regardless, "all Fire tablets' communication with Amazon's cloud meet our high standards for privacy and security including appropriate use of encryption." She didn't respond to follow-up questions asking whether any encryption at all is supported by the updated software.
Speaking at the same luncheon as Carder, retired Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace said a serious national debate over the role and importance of encryption needs to occur. "And," he added, "the Bill of Rights needs to be front and center."
Pace said he learned through his work in the military that not even the US can defend against the most sophisticated hacking tools out there. So, he's not in a hurry to make data more vulnerable.
"My bias is that encryption is the best way to ensure privacy," he said.