No spam on the spambone
Even the most ardent of antispammers are wishing luck to the long-anticipated and much maligned backbone network for spammers.
What gives?
Since the Net's two most notorious spammers announced their intention to build a spam backbone, junk email has become so unpopular and difficult to send legitimately that, in truth, it won't be a spam backbone after all.
More coverage on CNET Radio |
Instead, GTMI will be based on an increasingly popular business concept: People will be paid to get advertisements through email. It's not unlike free Web-based email in which Netizens agree to get ads in their email boxes in exchange for free accounts.
But GTMI will work directly with Internet service providers, giving them free T-1 connections in exchange for the ability to send advertising email to their customers. ISPs, in turn, would give discounts to customers who agree to get the email, although prices are up to the ISPs.
Even John Mozena, cofounder of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE), likes the idea. "If GTMI is sending commercial messages to people who want to receive them, more power to them," he said.
The attitude is a far cry from the fight between spammers and antispammers that arose after GTMI made its first official launch announcement in November. Back then, GTMI's backers, Sanford Wallace and Walt Rines, were the two highest-profile spammers in the business.
And those roles made them--especially Wallace--two of the most hated men on the Net.
You could even say that he's crossed over to the other side.
Plus, he added, being the bad boy of the Net can only last so long when the tide has changed. Not only is spam unpopular, but with so many effective filters that guard against it, companies successfully pursuing legal measures against junk emailers, and the politicians beginning to legislate against it, the writing is on the wall.